The lecture refutes the points illustrated in the reading material.
In accordance with the listening, the professor/lecturer claims/draws the conclusion that …
On the contrary, the reading contends an opposite standing that …
The first point the professor uses to cast doubt on the reading is that …, which differs from the statement in the reading material that …
Another evidence the speaker adopts to contradict the passage is that … However, the reading states that …
The additional discussion focuses on … The lecturer maintains that …, which poses challenge to the assumption of the reading that …
In conclusion, the point made in the lecture contrasts with what is presented in the reading.
The lecture reinforces the points illustrated in the reading material.
In accordance with the listening, the professor claims that ..., meanwhile, the reading contends a similar standing that …
The first point the professor uses to solidify the reading is that …, which is almost same as the statement in the reading material that …
Another evidence the speaker adopts to bolster the passage is that …, likewise, the reading states that …
The additional discussion focuses on …. The speaker maintains that …, and the reading holds that …
In conclusion, the point made in the lecture gives a boost to what is presented in the reading.
Under many circumstances, the issue of X is much concerned to a point
where a wide discussion has been aroused. One conventional notion is
that ... After a closer scrutiny into all the factors that matter, on large scale,
I would frown on this claim and reckon that it fails to be representative.
Initially, I have to concede that X is somewhat beneficial/ indispensable.
For one thing, X, on some occasions, it serves as ... which contributes to ... For the other,
it is relatively effective ...
Nevertheless, the rationality of the claim is largely undermined by
the oversimplification it suffers from. As is often the case, X is acknowledged as a controversial
existence whose definition involves a combination of efforts on both internal and external
layers and differs among people varying in personalities as well as values.
Even the objective layers bear the possibilities of driving the results
to other paths. In this sense, it is kind of absurdity to define ... by
highlighting ... With reference for the survey by International ...,60%
of the respondents between 16 and 89 in E.U. claimed that ... is the
last choice and 70% of whom believed that ...The case concerning ...
serves as an evidence which can largely consolidate my claim that... X is
tantamount to opening Pandora Box.
What is more, the validation of the view presented in this topic is
not universally self-evident. On the condition that the concepts closely
related, this proposal has been proved to be effective in... and any
other possibilities or efforts have been proved to be vain attempts and
X has won over the widest range of acknowledgement, the significance is
Supposed to be attached to
X. Whereas when these prerequisites remove, it would be another story.
At last, the consequences of highlighting ... rather than that of ...
is expected to bring about turn out to be destructive. One point that is
worth of mentioning is that the negative influence will be infectious
which can inevitably endanger the individual and the whole. In addition,
the potential confusions and misleading incur far outweigh the expected
benefits and opportunities it can offer. To be exact, it is tantamount to
the act of trading the possibility of sustainable development for the
reality of the present interests. Even worse, the assumption is acknowledged
as an illogical and irrational view which indicates a set of misplaced
values that run the risk of driving the well-being society to a dead end.
In brief, I would cast doubt on this claim. Furthermore, it is essential
for us to have circumspection before any critical decision-making.