一亩三分地论坛

 找回密码
 获取更多干货,去instant注册!

扫码关注一亩三分地公众号
查看: 926|回复: 4
收起左侧

[统计--核心课程] 关于experimental design的困惑

[复制链接] |试试Instant~ |关注本帖
helenaqa 发表于 2016-5-24 06:50:56 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

注册一亩三分地论坛,查看更多干货!

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?获取更多干货,去instant注册!

x
各位统计大神们,请问我们为什么会有各种各样的experimental design呢? 我在学习的过程中一直在问,为什么不单单用regression直接上indicator variable解出来就好了么?

为什么会有这个design,那个design,这个block,那个factor,感觉linear model只是把内容复杂化了,还不如regression来的直接呢?.鐣欏璁哄潧-涓浜-涓夊垎鍦
. 鐗涗汉浜戦泦,涓浜╀笁鍒嗗湴
望指教!
demonhunter 发表于 2016-5-24 14:38:51 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 demonhunter 于 2016-5-24 14:50 编辑

Sometimes people are only interested in the factors they want to study however the response is influenced by all factors so they need different design strategies to remove the influence of  these nuisance factors. . from: 1point3acres.com/bbs

Sometimes a simple linear regression is not able to fully explain the inner mechanism of your data(for example, to study repeated measurement you need mixed model) .. Waral 鍗氬鏈夋洿澶氭枃绔,
. visit 1point3acres.com for more.
Performing an experiment and getting data is far more expensive and time consuming than you can expected, so you have to check the collection of designs carefully and adopt one wisely.. 1point 3acres 璁哄潧

____________________________ calalia mentioned Randomization. That means your cannot always have a simple CRD design(assigning treatments to the Experiment Units completely randomly), whose model equals to a linear regression with several indicator predictors. Sometimes you just cannot run you Experiment in this completely random way(like assigning treatment to the plants in some algriculture experiment) so you need a more complicated model(like the model for split-plot deisgn)

回复 支持 4 反对 0

使用道具 举报

calalia 发表于 2016-5-24 13:17:21 | 显示全部楼层
为了Random
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| helenaqa 发表于 2016-5-25 10:54:36 | 显示全部楼层
demonhunter 发表于 2016-5-24 14:38-google 1point3acres
Sometimes people are only interested in the factors they want to study however the response is influ ...

Thank you demonhunter and thank you calalia!
. Waral 鍗氬鏈夋洿澶氭枃绔,
Thank you for your thoughtful and detailed discussion. I understand that the design of experiment is both an art and science. And once we have the design and the data, we can analyze the results using an appropriate linear model (CRD, BIBD, split-splot, etc), or with a linear regression model.

I am still puzzled whether there is a difference in the analysis stage, it appears to me the various linear model designs and linear regression do the same with parameters that differ only by a simple linear transformation.

Is that correct? Or is there more to it than that?
. From 1point 3acres bbs
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

demonhunter 发表于 2016-5-25 11:25:50 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 demonhunter 于 2016-5-25 11:27 编辑 . 1point3acres.com/bbs
helenaqa 发表于 2016-5-25 10:54
Thank you demonhunter and thank you calalia!

Thank you for your thoughtful and detailed discuss ...

"it appears to me the various linear model designs and linear regression do the same with parameters that differ only by a simple linear transformation."

No, many design linear models estimate parameters in a different way. For example, in mixed model:

y = X\beta + Zu +\epsilon, if you want to estimate u, the Random effect you need to use either ML or REML approach, you have to use more complicated Optimization Algorithm than Ordinary Linear model does.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

本版积分规则

请点这里访问我们的新网站:一亩三分地Instant.

Instant搜索更强大,不扣积分,内容组织的更好更整洁!目前仍在beta版本,努力完善中!反馈请点这里

关闭

一亩三分地推荐上一条 /5 下一条

手机版|小黑屋|一亩三分地论坛声明 ( 沪ICP备11015994号 )

custom counter

GMT+8, 2016-12-9 08:31

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc. Design By HUXTeam

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表