没结婚也能买房啊!大波士顿地区买房小tips

一亩三分地论坛

 找回密码
 Sign Up 注册获取更多干货
码农求职神器Triplebyte:
不用海投,内推多家公司面试
[Google级团队]:实时大数据分析领域践行者
北京/深圳-大数据/搜索/机器学习职位
日志易机器大数据行业践行者Web/大数据/机器学习等职位-北京or深圳
把贵司招聘信息放这里
查看: 1390|回复: 2
收起左侧

[金工金数] ZZ: the Economist - "Quant" hedge fund

[复制链接] |试试Instant~ |关注本帖
晴耕雨读 发表于 2013-12-2 12:31:11 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

注册一亩三分地论坛,查看更多干货!

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?Sign Up 注册获取更多干货

x
本帖最后由 晴耕雨读 于 2013-12-1 23:32 编辑

Just saw this from the Economist. 鍥磋鎴戜滑@1point 3 acres
*****************************************************************

IF SOMETHING has not worked for five years, most people would conclude that it was broken. Tell that to the geeks managing “quant” hedge funds, who craft elaborate algorithms to profit from market movements. Once money-spinners, their prized formulae have misfired since 2009, losing money in four of the past five years. Unless their results improve markedly, the giant funds will finish this year as the worst-performing of the most common hedge-fund strategies.

“Trend-following” involves programming computers to analyse market movements and try to infer where they might go next. Practitioners speak with reverence of “crossover levels” and “momentum speeds” leading to “breakout points”. A rough translation is that a trend that lasts a few days or weeks can profitably be invested in until it reverses, at which point a new trend may already be forming. Whether the markets are going up or down does not matter. Nor does the underlying asset being analysed—typically a futures contract linked to a commodity or a security.
. Waral 鍗氬鏈夋洿澶氭枃绔,
After prospering through the market rout of 2008 (the prolonged slump gave even the dimmest trend-follower time to cotton on), the sector swelled from $91 billion to $215 billion, according to Hedge Fund Research, a data provider. Winton Capital, Man Group’s AHL fund, Cantab, BlueCrest and other “black box” traders, as their critics dub them, became darlings of the investing world. Unfortunately, the influx of investment coincided with the reversal in the strategy’s fortunes (see chart).

The main problem is not with the quants’ models, practitioners insist, but with the markets themselves. In the aftermath of the financial crisis, they have been dancing to the tune set by politicians and central bankers. Efforts to save the euro or stave off deflation regularly send markets into convulsions, in the process distorting the historical patterns that the algorithms are designed to exploit. The ensuing jolts and crashes have no precedent, leaving even the most finely crafted trade at risk from political meddling. Not even the world’s wiliest supercomputers can predict what the European Central Bank will dream of next, apparently..鐣欏璁哄潧-涓浜-涓夊垎鍦
. 1point 3acres 璁哄潧
Worse, such interference prompts stocks, bonds and commodities to move in unison. When in May the Federal Reserve hinted at a “tapering” of America’s ultra-loose monetary policy, for example, both government bonds and shares tumbled. What had started out as a good year for the trend-followers turned into a drubbing. One of the sector’s main selling-points, that its returns are uncorrelated to those of other asset classes, is at risk.

The quants are remarkably sanguine about their recent record. “Performance since 2009 in traditional strategies hasn’t been great, but it’s no disaster either,” says Sandy Rattray, AHL’s boss. Many of the stock-picking hedge funds that had been lionised for making money in the crash suffered large losses in subsequent years, he points out. Low interest rates, which depress returns on the safe assets quants hold as collateral to back their trades, have not helped.

The big unknown is whether trend-following will ever work again. The quants are adamant that the models are simply in hibernation. Profits will return, they say, as soon as prices revert to being dictated by investors rather than policymakers. “Imagine where bonds would be trading if it weren’t for the interference,” says Leda Braga of BlueCrest.

Some wonder whether the growth of quant-fund investing has irreparably harmed returns. Decent trend-following algorithms can be bought online. Some of the funds are adapting in response. Winton, the biggest, now invests some of its cash in equities; it is among the few to have risen in value this year, albeit modestly. AHL is focusing its energies on trading in more esoteric markets, like German power or iron-ore futures, which it hopes are less crowded. Yet it is hard to find markets that are immune to political meddling, or politicians who are inclined to let the forces of finance be. Trend-followers may yet prosper again, but the breakout point, as it were, may be some way off.

评分

1

查看全部评分

honeyruma 发表于 2013-12-2 13:18:55 | 显示全部楼层
同刚读到~顶一个
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 晴耕雨读 发表于 2013-12-3 10:27:36 | 显示全部楼层
第一次被加分,还有点小激动呢
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

本版积分规则

提醒:发帖可以选择内容隐藏,部分板块支持匿名发帖。请认真读完以下全部说明:

■隐藏内容方法: [hide=200]你想要隐藏的内容比如面经[/hide]
■意思是:用户积分低于200则看不到被隐藏的内容
■可以自行设置积分值,不建议太高(200以上太多人看不到),也不建议太低(那就没必要隐藏了)
■建议只隐藏关键内容,比如具体的面试题目、涉及隐私的信息,大部分内容没必要隐藏。
■微信/QQ/电子邮件等,为防止将来被骚扰甚至人肉,以论坛私信方式发给对方最安全。
■匿名发帖的板块和方法:http://www.1point3acres.com/bbs/thread-388663-1-1.html

关闭

一亩三分地推荐上一条 /5 下一条

手机版|小黑屋|一亩三分地论坛声明

custom counter

GMT+8, 2018-4-20 22:51

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc. Design By HUXTeam

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表