有没有人遇到过所有律师都不愿接案子

nick.gr.2019 发表于 2026-8-28 13:53
.google  и可以自己告然后用分配的免费律师吧，看过better call Saul的都懂

拜托帮看一下：现在我很迷茫，不知道该怎么写最后的brief来最大限度地维护自己的名誉了
On July 13, 2026, Alice filed a document captioned “Objections to the Record and
Requests to Supplement” in the matter of his/her pending appeal before the YYY Board of Regents.
The XXX filed a response on July 28, arguing that Alice’s requests
should be denied as each item is argumentative, irrelevant or immaterial to the final outcome, or
both. For the reasons stated below, Alice’s objections and requests to supplement are denied.
Regent Policy Manual
When considering an appeal filed in accordance with Regent Policy Manual (RPM) Chapter 1.7,
the Board does not customarily sit in the receipt of evidence. Rather, the Board’s review is based
on the record, written briefs, and oral argument (if granted). The record submitted on appeal to
the Board is that which was developed through each level of institutional review, and includes
those items listed in RPM section 1.7.3.C.
. 1point3acres.com Board policy permits parties to file objections or requests to supplement the record. RPM section
1.7.3.F. The purpose of this provision is to assure that the record submitted to the Board
accurately reflects the institutional proceedings below and contains all information required in
RPM section 1.7.3.C. The record typically will not be supplemented with evidence that was
available but not considered at any stage of institutional review. Additionally, evidence that was
properly considered by an institutional decision-maker will not be excluded from the Record on
appeal merely because one party disputes the probative value or credibility of the evidence.
Ruling on Objections to the Record
Alice filed a list of items labeled as objections to the record. Alice does not argue the documents
should not be part of the official record because they were improperly included at the institutional
stage. Rather, she “objects” to the information within the documents. Alice’s objections to the
record are purely argumentative and improperly raised at this stage of the appeal and are
therefore denied.
Ruling on Request to Supplement
Docusign Envelope ID: 0483732D-FE63-84BC-8030-3D5BC832F8E9Alice further requests that the appeal record be supplemented with additional argument, clarifying
context, statements of fact and purported records that speak to her character or intent during the
period of time that is the subject of the disciplinary action. A party requesting to present additional
evidence on appeal to the Board must generally establish “that the evidence is material, that good
cause existed for the failure to present the evidence at the hearing, and that the party has not
waived the right to present the evidence.” IAC 681-20.27(4)1. Evidence is considered material if
it is “reasonably capable of influencing an agency’s decision.” Humboldt Community Schools v.
Fleming, 603 N.W.2d 759, 765 (YYY 1999) (citation omitted). A party may fail to establish good
cause where evidence is available to the party prior to hearing but is not presented during the
hearing. See e.g. … … Leasing, Inc. v. YYY Dept. of Revenue, 274 N.W.2d 357, 362
(YYY 1979); Hollensbe v. YYY Dept. of Job Service, 418 N.W.2d 77, 80 (YYY App. 1987).
Several of Alice’s requests to supplement are argumentative and denied as untimely given this
stage of the appeal. For any remaining requests to supplement the record, Alice has failed to
demonstrate that the evidence is newly discovered or that good cause exists for her failure to
present it during any stage of institutional review. Alice has further failed to demonstrate that any
of the requests to supplement are material to the final institutional decision and disciplinary action.
Briefing Schedule
Written Briefs. The deadline for filing written briefs in the matter is hereby extended. Alice’s written
brief shall be filed on or before Thursday, September 3, with a copy of the same provided to the
XXX. The XXX shall have twenty (20) days following receipt of Alice’s brief to file a
written response.

amang 发表于 2026-8-28 21:12
你要把心态调稳了再来处理这事，律师是一帮最没有什么道德和世界观的只认钱的货，你钱给到位，他们什么都能 ...

拜托帮看一下：现在我很迷茫，不知道该怎么写最后的brief来最大限度地维护自己的名誉了
On July 13, 2026, Alice filed a document captioned “Objections to the Record and
Requests to Supplement” in the matter of his/her pending appeal before the YYY Board of Regents.
The XXX filed a response on July 28, arguing that Alice’s requests
should be denied as each item is argumentative, irrelevant or immaterial to the final outcome, or
both. For the reasons stated below, Alice’s objections and requests to supplement are denied.
Regent Policy Manual
When considering an appeal filed in accordance with Regent Policy Manual (RPM) Chapter 1.7,
the Board does not customarily sit in the receipt of evidence. Rather, the Board’s review is based
on the record, written briefs, and oral argument (if granted). The record submitted on appeal to
the Board is that which was developed through each level of institutional review, and includes
those items listed in RPM section 1.7.3.C.
Board policy permits parties to file objections or requests to supplement the record. RPM section
1.7.3.F. The purpose of this provision is to assure that the record submitted to the Board
accurately reflects the institutional proceedings below and contains all information required in
RPM section 1.7.3.C. The record typically will not be supplemented with evidence that was
available but not considered at any stage of institutional review. Additionally, evidence that was
properly considered by an institutional decision-maker will not be excluded from the Record on
appeal merely because one party disputes the probative value or credibility of the evidence.
Ruling on Objections to the Record
Alice filed a list of items labeled as objections to the record. Alice does not argue the documents
should not be part of the official record because they were improperly included at the institutional
stage. Rather, she “objects” to the information within the documents. Alice’s objections to the
record are purely argumentative and improperly raised at this stage of the appeal and are
therefore denied.
Ruling on Request to Supplement
Docusign Envelope ID: 0483732D-FE63-84BC-8030-3D5BC832F8E9Alice further requests that the appeal record be supplemented with additional argument, clarifying
context, statements of fact and purported records that speak to her character or intent during the
period of time that is the subject of the disciplinary action. A party requesting to present additional
evidence on appeal to the Board must generally establish “that the evidence is material, that good
cause existed for the failure to present the evidence at the hearing, and that the party has not
waived the right to present the evidence.” IAC 681-20.27(4)1. Evidence is considered material if
it is “reasonably capable of influencing an agency’s decision.” Humboldt Community Schools v.
Fleming, 603 N.W.2d 759, 765 (YYY 1999) (citation omitted). A party may fail to establish good
cause where evidence is available to the party prior to hearing but is not presented during the
hearing. See e.g. … … Leasing, Inc. v. YYY Dept. of Revenue, 274 N.W.2d 357, 362
(YYY 1979); Hollensbe v. YYY Dept. of Job Service, 418 N.W.2d 77, 80 (YYY App. 1987).
-baidu 1point3acresSeveral of Alice’s requests to supplement are argumentative and denied as untimely given this
stage of the appeal. For any remaining requests to supplement the record, Alice has failed to
demonstrate that the evidence is newly discovered or that good cause exists for her failure to
present it during any stage of institutional review. Alice has further failed to demonstrate that any
of the requests to supplement are material to the final institutional decision and disciplinary action.
Briefing Schedule
Written Briefs. The deadline for filing written briefs in the matter is hereby extended. Alice’s written
brief shall be filed on or before Thursday, September 3, with a copy of the same provided to the
XXX. The XXX shall have twenty (20) days following receipt of Alice’s brief to file a
written response.

就是没钱赚，或者说根本不可能打赢。

qlxf 发表于 2026-8-28 21:56
就是没钱赚，或者说根本不可能打赢。

但是YYY那边的安保人员确实漏出很多马脚啊。AI分析的是XXX要保护YYY，所以坚定地站YYY那边。YYY怕巨额赔偿，所以也坚定地站安保人员那边

谷歌用户 发表于 2026-8-28 15:01
但是YYY那边的安保人员确实漏出很多马脚啊。AI分析的是XXX要保护YYY，所以坚定地站YYY那边。YYY怕巨额赔 ...

你一顿分析也没有用，专业律师比你懂的多，他们肯定看到了对方律师可以轻易搞定你说的这些东西。

hinewlife 发表于 2026-8-27 00:44
civil litigation 律师如果不愿意接一般是因为你的case性价比不高 如果potential赔偿金额很高 抢着接都来不 ...

那为啥我明明知道律师会拒绝，律师也拒绝过我，我的朋友们都还是劝我去找律师呢？

多金的大白鹅 发表于 2026-8-27 03:23
. check 1point3acres for more.案子性价比不高的话是可能会碰到的。我病友找人打medical malpractice官司也很不容易，问了一圈就找到一家 ...

怎么措辞才能找到的？我问了快上百家了，也是没人接，而且态度非常坚决。按小时付费也拒绝了我

qlxf 发表于 2026-8-28 22:04
你一顿分析也没有用，专业律师比你懂的多，他们肯定看到了对方律师可以轻易搞定你说的这些东西。

可是事实就是对方撒了很大的谎啊。而且做出了非常伤天害理的事情。难道黑的还能说成白的？

谷歌用户 发表于 2026-8-28 15:08
可是事实就是对方撒了很大的谎啊。而且做出了非常伤天害理的事情。难道黑的还能说成白的？

对方就算噶了人，厉害的律师都可以打成无罪释放。

谷歌用户 发表于 2026-8-28 14:51
拜托帮看一下：现在我很迷茫，不知道该怎么写最后的brief来最大限度地维护自己的名誉了
On July 13, 202 ...

看了一下，这种法律上的东西，还是不敢乱说，具体意见还是只能律师给。