大家买车都签了Mandatory arbitration clauses

买车签合同有一个条款Agreement to Arbitrage，强制签这个条款是非法的吗？有没有dealer不需要签的，或者大家怎么免掉这个条款的呢？

网上一些英文资料解释这个条款的意思是，dealer可以suit customer，但是customer不可以suit dealer；然后dealer可以指定arbitrage的judge。

表格 553-CA-ARB-eps 7/16，链接在此：
https://pdf4pro.com/cdn/553-ca-a ... tral-com-448856.pdf

网上有说整个加州都是这么规定的，也有说这是某些dealer自己强加的规定。



分享一个资料：
https://www.wirtzlaw.com/forced- ... xample-the-law-553/


However, manufacturers have begun using the broadly worded arbitration provisions in LAW 553 and other purchase agreements and leases to try to force California Lemon Law claims into arbitration. Manufacturers have had some success in convincing over-docketed courts that the California Lemon Law claims of some consumers should go to arbitration.

It may be possible to avoid the apparent pre-dispute binding arbitration by agreeing with your dealer to strike the arbitration provision from the document or to use a document that does not contain an arbitration provision. While LAW 553 is a pre-printed form, it is still a contract potentially subject to negotiation.

有，好像是禁止把车倒卖到其他国家，否则起诉你之类的？太多条款，我没仔细看，话说大的dealer信誉应该还可以

同问加州买车 我dealer也是让我签这个，现在有点犹豫，dealer说是标准合同，但看网上说有的是dealer加上的，不是法律强制

伊州买车倒是签协议
双方互不诉讼对方
郊区的dealer普遍松，0 DOWN贷款income paystubs也不查
城里的dealer见过很严格的，全款买车，SSN全套查，说是911之后查是否是买车人参与恐怖活动

伊州买车倒是签协议
双方互不诉讼对方
郊区的dealer普遍松，0 DOWN贷款income paystubs也不查
城里的dealer见过很严格的，全款买车，SSN全套查，说是911之后查是否是买车人参与恐怖活动