Gatech太穷已经严重影响 学校质量了 以前和我争论的那几个不服来辩

vitamin 发表于 2014-4-23 06:05
这位同学，你好。我是佐治亚的在校生。你这样诋毁佐治亚的行为严重影响了佐治亚的声誉。你现在对你提出 严  ...

gaytech被黑出翔了

wweerr 发表于 2014-4-23 06:23
gaytech被黑出翔了

额。。。黑点明显不是Gaytech啊。。。



补充内容 (2014-4-23 06:32):
我以为你回的是Fly-higher那帖。。。Gaytech躺枪。。。子弹比站着中枪的CU还多，哇哈哈

I only talk about engineering majors
补充内容 (2014-4-22 01:09):
学校这么不理ms，各种不在乎，去了不会被坑么？比如，cmu有各种career office，处理各种事物，觉得按照gatech现在的情况。。gatech不太可能有啊。我们会不会成为被忽视的人
private schools and public schools are very very differnt. usually public school is for middle class, you survive by yourself, answer to no one and expect no one's help. Private schools are very very different, they take care of students very greatly, such as service and net working. You have to understand the nature of private schools and public schools. one extreme comparision would be Yale vs. UC berkeley. However, I never went to other public  universities, so I cannot say if gatech is at the bottom or average or at the top of public schools.

补充内容 (2014-4-22 01:10):
而学校这么穷（又嘲了，学长快来~），会不会影响老师质量，学校设施质量，research机会/质量，等等。真的不会有影响么？！ 觉得一个学校的学术实力和fund有很大关系才对

Yes, but funds are complex. Professors' research fundings have nothing to do with tuition/teach rather than the fact that GRA's tuition got covered by these fundings. UIUC is extremely poor and in my view, poorer than GT. However, no one would doubt UIUC's academic research reputation of ECE department. You know what I mean if you are in the industry.
To sum up, it's a very long and extremely complex question. To answer it in short. Yes and No. poorer schools' teaching quality is less than richer schools. But you have to consider a lot of other factors including:
1. most private schools suck at engineering or their engineering departments are too small and have quite litte impacts and influence. So the oppertunites there are much fewer.
2. I am getting tired at typing, there are many other factors.
补充内容 (2014-4-22 01:16):
而且，根据usnews的数据，Admissions rate有54.9%!!! （据说就是因为是公立）。作为对比: UCSD: 37.8%, USC: 19.9!!, UCLA: 22.0%, 哥大: 7.4%!!, JHU: 17.7%, Emory: 26.3%。。。虽说是本科的数据但也说明点什么吧
You have to also consider the other facts. I don't even want to list them because they are too many. It's hard to answer when the question is too simlified and misguided. For instance, it's a joke if anyone compares Emory's ECE to GT's ECE.
补充内容 (2014-4-22 01:25):
. 1point3acres再有，这种情况，作为国际学生，又是ms，奖学金不用想了吧？当然除了做项目，RATA等
Of course no for you, unless thesis master.



I think you have too much expection for GT and felt down when found out the truth. The truth is for engineering(excluding IE's financial direction and BME), schools' ranking matters in term of groups.
Rank I group inlcudes MIT and etc depends on specific majors, around 4 schools
Rank II group includes GT, UIUC and etc depends on specific majors up to 20 schools
Rank II group include, maybe up to 50 or even 80 schools.

I have no interest in discussing other ranks. It's a joke if anyone is saying UIUC is significantly better than GT. But it's also a joke to say UIUC is significantly worse than GT. After all, the difference of schools in the same rank is very slim.

补充内容 (2014-4-22 18:18):
To fully answers all your questions, I have to write up to 20 pages in font size of 10. I could not do it. I personally say GT is average or low at Rank II Group depends on majors.

亲你太机智了，要不是看到发帖人是你我以为还呵呵了呢~
看你帖子好开森

欢迎收看XXX太X已经严重XXXX系列

       a

吃啥才算成熟 发表于 2014-4-23 00:13
凭什么随便移我的帖子。

        a

                 a

吃啥才算成熟 发表于 2014-4-22 10:02
有一定道理！难道ms就是拿来挣钱的？！
去gatech之后想尽量多认识一点本科的（但是怕被嫌弃太老。。汗）

MS 收生收很多的话，可以认为是拿来挣钱的。。