大家来谈谈如何读paper吧~~

前3页，后三页，如果很novel的话，可能中间的也需要读

来学习一下，

非常巧，最近教授在指导我们如何读paper，因为phd qualify的一项考试是给一篇paper，然后critique, 在3个教授面前做一个paper critique presentation，如果两个教授给通过，就通过了博士资格考试~

下面是我练习读paper事后，老师要我们考虑的几个问题，然后几个同学在一起集中讨论：

As part of your preparation for tomorrow’s discussion, I’d like each of you to do the following:

·         In a few sentences (2-3) describe the relevance of the described research area to society.

·         In a few sentences (2-3) describe what is novel about the work described in the paper.

·         List 3 strengths and 3 weaknesses of the paper. Make sure that you pick the right flavor of strengths/weaknesses, as prof. Sholl discussed last week; typos and obvious errors in equations don’t count.

·         Pick one of the key conclusions of the paper and analyze whether the data in the paper support that conclusion sufficiently.

·         Pick the one graph that you deem absolutely essential and be prepared to explain to the rest of the group within 90 seconds the key features of the graph AND their physical relevance. What is happening and WHY is it happening?

·         Find one relevant reference in the literature that is NOT listed in the paper; explain briefly why that reference is helpful for understanding the paper.

其实这几个问题都挺不好回答的，常常我觉得读懂了paper，可是一到回答这些问题又花费了不少时间去斟酌考虑~大家看看吧

学习了,最近收到一大堆要读的paper

13# stephanielfy
相当有用啊。学习了。感谢！
我最近论文读得很浅啊。。。要加油了。

不知道是谁说的：很多论文是不值得读的。
一般论文有两种读法：1，读思想。2，学技术细节。
留着点时间享受花花世界。

不知道是谁说的：很多论文是不值得读的。
一般论文有两种读法：1，读思想。2，学技术细节。
留着点时间享受花花世界。
enigmabird 发表于 2010-11-5 11:02

天秤男...果然享受生活是主题

我现在也存在读论文读的很浅的问题啊

非常巧，最近教授在指导我们如何读paper，因为phd qualify的一项考试是给一篇paper，然后critique, 在3个教授面前做一个paper critique presentation，如果两个教授给通过，就通过了博士资格考试~

下面是我练习读paper事后，老师要我们考虑的几个问题，然后几个同学在一起集中讨论：

As part of your preparation for tomorrow’s discussion, I’d like each of you to do the following:

·         In a few sentences (2-3) describe the relevance of the described research area to society.

·         In a few sentences (2-3) describe what is novel about the work described in the paper.

·         List 3 strengths and 3 weaknesses of the paper. Make sure that you pick the right flavor of strengths/weaknesses, as prof. Sholl discussed last week; typos and obvious errors in equations don’t count.

·         Pick one of the key conclusions of the paper and analyze whether the data in the paper support that conclusion sufficiently.

·         Pick the one graph that you deem absolutely essential and be prepared to explain to the rest of the group within 90 seconds the key features of the graph AND their physical relevance. What is happening and WHY is it happening?

·         Find one relevant reference in the literature that is NOT listed in the paper; explain briefly why that reference is helpful for understanding the paper.

这个很有用！谢谢！~


- 發送自我的 iPhone 大板凳應用