查看: 2441| 回复: 5
跳转到指定楼层
上一主题 下一主题
收起左侧

看完这篇文章,我对性别对立有了新的认识

全局:

注册一亩三分地论坛,查看更多干货!

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号?注册账号

x

我一直在思考为什么性别对立这么严重,看到这篇文章让我豁然开朗。中心思想:算法制造了网络同温层。虽然有段子手编段子制造仇恨,但是是算法精准的把不同的段子推荐给不同的性别群体,无形之中制造了两个毫无交集、尖锐对立、互相仇恨的网络军团。所以算法才是真·气氛组,我想大家刷手机的时候多少会被推荐过类似的性别对立的段子。文章的结尾给出的意见是跳出网络同温层,求同存异。view other people as worthy of my consideration when they express differing opinions. 真想结婚的都是跳出了同温层的人,剩下一群haters继续在各自的同温层里内耗。不知道大家怎么看。


原文需要注册才能浏览,为了节省大家的时间,我把原文贴在下面供参考。
=====================================================================
https://medium.com/@raijordan_36...-other-e3a7ce234bdd
The Gender Wars

As I migrated over to Medium, I noticed that there was a focus on think pieces, and I consumed them with a curious eye.
After a few days of reading, a glimpse at my recommendations would have you believe that I was a woman (true) in her mid-twenties (true!) desperately searching for the affections of a husband amongst a sea of men who simply wanted to use me for sex…
Aah… not true. This has never been my experience.
A trip down the rabbit hole further revealed to me that the women who were writing articles about men who refused to marry them had a counterpart — a community of men who were writing articles about how women are manipulative and only seek to own a man’s wallet — interesting!
I found this dynamic between the flip sides of the same coin to be intriguing; they belonged to the same algorithm but were on opposing sides of the argument, and they hated each other.
They slid into each other's comment sections, armed to the teeth with gendered slurs, false proclamations, and logical fallacies that only served to make the opposing side angrier — like a revolving door of self-fulfilling prophecies.
“See!” Cried the angry mob of women, “Men will never give us wedding rings because all they care about is sex!”
“See!” Cried the bitter mob of men, “We can never trust a woman who wishes to marry because she will only use us for material gain!”
They were essentially shaking their fists at phantoms created by the algorithm
I could find no inkling of either party’s plight in my own personal experiences
But that’s the beauty (and the horror) of the internet — we’re frequently confronted with realities that look nothing like our own,
But what we often fail to recognize is that our inability to relate to another person does not make that person's experience null and void… but the algorithm certainly does make some people believe that their experience is the only one worth noting, and this is what I have witnessed in Medium’s algorithm.Are Algorithms Actually Dangerous?

This divide — hateful as it is — is relatively benign.
While there is vitriol between the women who wish to marry and the men who wish to protect their wealth, this problem seems to be reserved for those particular in-groups.
So, is the algorithm that fuels their confirmation bias really so dangerous? Perhaps on a personal level… but to society at large? Probably not. People who genuinely wish to marry will continue to do so, regardless of the opinions of a few angry men and women.When the Algorithm Delivers the Trolls

I have no doubt that the algorithm is a threat to me also; It is likely that I myself have — on occasion — been unceremoniously washed upon the shores of someone else's online home by the algorithm, only to berate them based on my own shallow interpretation of their reality before they have time to even say ‘hello’.
So, in direct opposition to the algorithm Gods and their polarising agendas, I’m going to continue to view other people as worthy of my consideration when they express differing opinions. Of course, this grace doesn’t extend to hate, but by all means, let’s engage in discourse.
Just be sure it arrives as a well-considered conversation, as opposed to a pile of steaming word vomit on my doorstep, and I’ll extend to you the same favour.

上一篇:总算理解了“买卖不成仁义在”
下一篇:国男码农在NYC的交友约会观察
推荐
David_Ying 2023-8-15 02:53:05 | 只看该作者
全局:
ubatuba 发表于 2023-8-14 10:22
不止性别对立,还有红蓝对立和中西对立,都是一样的
互联网开始的时候让人们看到了更多的信息和更广阔的世 ...

上层 1% 的人占据了社会绝大部分资源,通过掌握各种传播媒介告诉下面 99% 的人:“ 你瞧,你们之间不平等。”
下面 99% 的人听完分裂成一个个带着标签的群体开始互相仇视对骂,乐此不疲。
上层 1% 的人看到这个局面,觉得自己的阶级地位更安稳了。
回复

使用道具 举报

推荐
Jay_L 2023-9-1 09:03:34 | 只看该作者
全局:
本帖最后由 Jay_L 于 2023-8-31 18:04 编辑

很有意义的讨论。其实正常人脑子清醒的都能分辨出什么是正常的舆论什么是有意挑起对立的舆论。当然了,“不是蠢就是坏”的那一类人是不会分辨的。“坏”的人是有目的带节奏的,“蠢”的人是跟风拱火被情绪支配的《乌合之众》。
回复

使用道具 举报

全局:
就是底层互害啊,很多国男国女互相争谁多占了一点点利益,就没想过其实我们本质上都是三等公民,一致对外一起争取利益不好么。
回复

使用道具 举报

全局:
不止性别对立,还有红蓝对立和中西对立,都是一样的
互联网开始的时候让人们看到了更多的信息和更广阔的世界,然后却被丧尽天良的资本用以煽动阶级对立和底层互害。印证了围城的说法:从前愚民政策是不许人民受教育,现代愚民政策是只许人民受某一种教育。不受教育的人,因为不识字,上人的当,受教育的人,因为识了字,上印刷品的当。
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册账号
隐私提醒:
  • ☑ 禁止发布广告,拉群,贴个人联系方式:找人请去🔗同学同事飞友,拉群请去🔗拉群结伴,广告请去🔗跳蚤市场,和 🔗租房广告|找室友
  • ☑ 论坛内容在发帖 30 分钟内可以编辑,过后则不能删帖。为防止被骚扰甚至人肉,不要公开留微信等联系方式,如有需求请以论坛私信方式发送。
  • ☑ 干货版块可免费使用 🔗超级匿名:面经(美国面经、中国面经、数科面经、PM面经),抖包袱(美国、中国)和录取汇报、定位选校版
  • ☑ 查阅全站 🔗各种匿名方法

本版积分规则

>
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表