不准访问
- 积分
- 518
- 大米
- 颗
- 鳄梨
- 个
- 水井
- 尺
- 蓝莓
- 颗
- 萝卜
- 根
- 小米
- 粒
- 学分
- 个
- 注册时间
- 2012-10-31
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
|
本帖最后由 zheng18552 于 2012-12-4 12:21 编辑
I am not a duke student but I can offer some info.
M.Eng is not something only duke offers. M.Eng is widely offered at various graduate schools such as MIT or UCB or Stanford. It is true M.Eng is new. I heard that UCB's M.Eng is only 2-3 years old. But that does not mean M.Eng is significantly inferior to M.S.
. Χ
Some people say M.S. equals to M.Eng. The only difference M.Eng. is more closely connected to industry, which means the career service would be much better. You have larger chances to get a job.
Some say M.S. is slightly better than M.Eng. The rest say M.Eng is better than M.S. if the concern is job hunting.
My view is that companies do not care so much about the difference. They view M.eng equally as M.S. at the first stage of hiring a person, resume screening. If one would be hired is determined by the performance during the following tests/interviews.
There are still some tops schools which refues to open the new born degree of M.eng, such as georgia tech. Instead, these schools just say the m.s. can also be a non-thesis track depends on one's choice. This policy makes a M.S. more like a M.eng, but without better career service and unique M.Eng courses I mentioned above.
..
the bottom line is M.S. if more academic and easier for one to go for a Ph.D. M.Eng is more closely connrected to industry. It has better career service for job hunting. The courses required for the two degrees are also slightly different. M.Eng has some sort of team work, project course while M.S. does not. If you want a Ph.d eventually, go for M.s., otherwise the difference is slim. ..
|
|