为什么巴黎高师的排名不高?

如题, 这个问题我一直没搞懂. 神一样的巴黎高师为啥在各个版本的世界排名中似乎都排不进TOP20?

这是否说明世界大学排名没有靠谱的?

反正USnews的世界综合排名我一般都是呵呵一笑而过。。

因为高师体积太小了，人少，人均就算很高，乘以人数就劣势了

simonology 发表于 2013-1-30 13:13
因为高师体积太小了，人少，人均就算很高，乘以人数就劣势了

感觉即使论毕业学生的学术成就总和. 高师相对世界上任何一所大学应该都不占劣势啊.
至少数学方面, 菲尔兹奖人数完爆哈佛普林啊. 但是各排名版本中数学类排名都没把高师排很高.

163 发表于 2013-1-30 20:48
感觉即使论毕业学生的学术成就总和. 高师相对世界上任何一所大学应该都不占劣势啊.
至少数学方面, 菲尔 ...

这可能就要细查一下各个排名的具体标准了，要是直接上菲奖数，高师的确顿时高富帅了

法国的高校都是牛叉但不突出，不像英国和美国搞综合大学

有个朋友就在巴黎高师。。。本科就国家公派出去的，本科提前毕业，现在硕士也快提前毕业了。。。

The closest analogue for evaluating the quality of academic education are the annual rankings of colleges and universities by U.S. News and World Report but these rankings have not only been widely and severely criticized,growing numbers of colleges are refusing to supply the data used in such rankings, which itself undermines the validity of the rankings, regardless of the merits of the criticisms. There are similar attempts at ranking academic institutions by journalists in Britain, Germany and other countries, and by Shanghai Jiao Tong University in China, but the same university can have radically different rankings in these various systems, calling into question the validity of all these rankings.
rely on broad-brush indicators of campus resources, such as the number of books in campus libraries and student:faculty ratios— in short, the same kinds of input criteria, rather than measures of educational output, for which U.S. News and World Report has been criticized. But, far from providing reliable indicators of educational quality or efficiency, the use of such indicators can become a barrier against newer and lower-cost ways of educating students that can be reflected in lower tuitions. For example, reading materials available on-line or on DVDs can replace books and bound volumes of academic journals and otherperiodicals that would be more cosdy to buy and require more expensive storage space on library shelves.
最近在看economical facts and fallacies里 academic facts and fallacies这一章里提到的。
顺便提下One of the biggest fallacies about academic institutions is that attendance at big-name colleges and universities is virtually essential for reaching the top in later life.

tsl665 发表于 2013-1-30 00:04
反正USnews的世界综合排名我一般都是呵呵一笑而过。。

个人偏见：基本上所有世界排名都只配呵呵。。。。

zach 发表于 2013-2-8 14:34
个人偏见：基本上所有世界排名都只配呵呵。。。。

首先排名不是一切这是肯定的。。本身也不存在完全准确的排名。。排名的存在只是让一个不了解情况的外行人第一眼看上去就能知道大概状况。。

就个人了解的信息来看，相对而言，大多数人还是觉得US News的美国本科综合排名是有一定参考价值的。。相比之下，那个扯淡的全球排名才真的只配呵呵