📣 Back to School开学季 - VIP通行证5折优惠!蓝莓、Offer多多同步优惠
楼主: xwjsarah30
跳转到指定楼层
上一主题 下一主题
收起左侧

手把手教你如何写信反对烙印的HR1044

   
全局:
zxh1031 发表于 2019-7-2 05:14
我贴个视频:Mike Lee 在congress提出, Paul反对:原话是,Reserve the right to object.  I have offered ...

他自己想加私货

例如给护士们更多的签证
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
夏刈不能 2019-7-5 23:34:45 | 只看该作者
全局:
补充一个Google doc里没有的,For Sen. Martha McSally, Scheduler是Alana Wilson,email是alana_wilson@mcsally.senate.gov
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
stukame 2019-7-6 00:56:26 | 只看该作者
全局:
管理员更新:

susan1013的分享

我群发之后,被人直接说“take me off the list"。我个人觉得大家用同一个模版,不停地群发,不仅不能表达观点,这些议员看了之后可能会觉得被骚扰了。既然是要表达观点,最好按照别人的规则来。

以下是我群发后收到的回复。他的表达很克制了,但是估计也是被骚扰得不行了。他的建议是去当地议员网站下create一个case,这样比较得体而且有效。

This is not a productive way to share your opinion on this legislation.
Please share this with your colleagues as well.  Whoever advised you and MANY others to email over 350 congressional staffers on their personal business accounts, over and over again, is at best misinformed.
If you would like to share your opinion on an issue, you should use our website(s).  You can write Senator Kaine at www.kaine.senate.gov and you will receive a reply if you are from Virginia..
One other piece of advice.  You should have people reaching out to members from their home states.  For example, constituents for Virginia should write the delegation from Virginia.
Sincerely,


您好!
本帖隐藏的内容需要积分高于 99999 才可浏览
您当前积分为 0。
使用VIP即刻解锁阅读权限或查看其他获取积分的方式
游客,您好!
本帖隐藏的内容需要积分高于 99999 才可浏览
您当前积分为 0。
VIP即刻解锁阅读权限查看其他获取积分的方式
Unlock interview details and practice with AI
Curated Interview Questions from Top Companies

评分

参与人数 11大米 +50 收起 理由
meglory + 3 给你点个赞!
monster_gump + 3 给你点个赞!
lihaiba2333 + 2 很有用的信息!
admin + 30
章鱼章鱼 + 2 给你点个赞!

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

无效楼层,该帖已经被删除
🔗
pacioli618 2019-7-6 12:46:55 | 只看该作者
全局:
帮顶帮顶帮顶帮顶
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
 楼主| xwjsarah30 2019-7-7 11:02:43 | 只看该作者
全局:
senator 邮件模版:
SUBJECT LINE:  
DO NOT ALLOW S386 TO PASS, IT WILL WIPE OUT DIVERSITY IN EB GREEN CARDS

EMAIL: COPY AND PASTE
  
Dear Senator,

Legislative Bill S386, "Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act of 2019" nearly passed on June 27, in a sneaky Senate floor vote.  This is outrageous considering many Legislators were participating in the debates.  

YOU MUST NOT ALLOW S386 TO PASS A FLOOR VOTE!  I URGE YOU TO OBJECT TO THIS LEGISLATION WHEN IT IS BROUGHT TO THE FLOOR FOR ANOTHER VOTE!  

This legislation will allow only one country – India – to dominate the Employment Based Green Cards for nearly 12 years!  An entire generation of foreign workers from 190+ other countries will NOT have a chance to work in the United States!  

Since I am foreigner from [YOUR COUNTRY] and a resident of United States, I will be severely affected by this legislation should it pass into law. THIS IS NOT FAIR AND ONE COUNTRY SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO DOMINATE THE EB/GC SYSTEM!  Additionally, S386 would have a severe impact to the vital interests of the United States and would wipe out all ethnic, skill and industry diversity in the United States.  

I am part of the Multinational Coalition and we are a diverse group of professionals from across the world who are currently residing here in the US, all of whom are against this legislation.  

Attached to this email, is our 1-Page summary facts for your review.  This document factually outlines why S386, if enacted, would have long-term damaging consequences to the US Employment based high-skilled immigration system.  
S386 "Fairness for High Skilled Immigrants Act of 2019", facts are as follows:
-> Current Employment-Based Green Card (EB/GC) program is NOT discriminatory to Indian nationals:
- Indian Nationals currently receive nearly 75% of H1B visas
- 55-60% of Green Card PERM filings (the first step in the GC process)
- 17-20% of EB/GC – which is much higher than the 7% caps due to SPILLOVER from other countries’ underutilized EB/GC  

India represents a proportional 17% of the world's population and for many years has received 17-20% of EB/GC. Contrary to what is claimed, there is actually NO discrimination against India in the current EB/GC program – the 7% country caps are not discriminatory!

For a period of more than 10 years, S386 would allow only India to co-opt the program and would effectively wipe out diversity in skilled legal immigration.  Since the majority of PhDs and MDs are NOT from India as noted below, and these valued foreign professionals perform critical research here in the US, this legislation would have a catastrophic impact to US vital interests.

US-Based PhD and MD facts:  
-> Nearly 80% of US-based MD's are from foreign countries around the world and NOT from India!   [source:  OECD.stat]
-> More than 90% of PhD's from US-Based schools currently performing critical research in the US are from foreign countries around the world and NOT from INDIA!   [source:  Hanson, University of Chicago]

A "YES VOTE", or co-sponsoring S386, "Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act of 2019", would effectively wipe out ethnic diversity in the skilled legal immigration system and be detrimental to the vital interests of the USA!


Our Website is below:

www.nos386.com


Thank you very kindly

[YOUR NAME]

评分

参与人数 4大米 +15 收起 理由
perlin + 10 很有用的信息!
gsqug + 1 给你点个赞!
hidemyfaceX + 1 很有用的信息!
flag_on + 3 给你点个赞!

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
 楼主| xwjsarah30 2019-7-7 11:03:58 | 只看该作者
全局:
house representative 邮件模版:
SUBJECT LINE:  
VOTE NO on HR 1044 "Fairness for High-skilled Immigrants Act"

EMAIL: COPY AND PASTE
  
Dear [LEGISLATOR SCHEDULER First name Last name]

Legislative Bill HR 1044, "Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act of 2019" is one of the most consequential, yet potentially damaging legislation in Congress.   This legislation favors only one country and allows it to completely co-opt the entire Employment Based Green Card program.  

Since I am a resident of [ADD STATE], I will be severely affected by this legislation should it pass into law. HR1044 would have a severe impact to the vital interests of the United States and would wipe out all ethnic, skill and industry diversity in the United States.  

I am part of the Multinational Coalition and we are a diverse group of professionals from across the world who are currently residing here in the US, all of whom are against this legislation.  

Attached to this email, is our 1-Page summary facts for your review.  This document factually outlines why HR1044, if enacted, would have long-term damaging consequences to the US Employment based high-skilled immigration system.  
HR 1044 "Fairness for High Skilled Immigrants Act of 2019", facts are as follows:
-> Current Employment-Based Green Card (EB/GC) program is NOT discriminatory to Indian nationals:
- Indian Nationals currently receive nearly 75% of H1B visas
- 55-60% of Green Card PERM filings (the first step in the GC process)
- 17-20% of EB/GC – which is much higher than the 7% caps due to SPILLOVER from other countries’ underutilized EB/GC  

India represents a proportional 17% of the world's population and for many years has received 17-20% of EB/GC. Contrary to what is claimed, there is actually NO discrimination against India in the current EB/GC program – the 7% country caps are not discriminatory!

For a period of more than 10 years, HR 1044 would allow only India to co-opt the program and would effectively wipe out diversity in skilled legal immigration.  Since the majority of PhDs and MDs are NOT from India as noted below, and these valued foreign professionals perform critical research here in the US, this legislation would have a catastrophic impact to US vital interests.

US-Based PhD and MD facts:  
-> Nearly 80% of US-based MD's are from foreign countries around the world and NOT from India!   [source:  OECD.stat]
-> More than 90% of PhD's from US-Based schools currently performing critical research in the US are from foreign countries around the world and NOT from INDIA!   [source:  Hanson, University of Chicago]

A "YES VOTE", or co-sponsoring HR1044, "Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act of 2019", would effectively wipe out ethnic diversity in the skilled legal immigration system and be detrimental to the vital interests of the USA!


Our Website is below:

www.nohr1044.com


Thank you very kindly

[YOUR NAME]


评分

参与人数 3大米 +6 收起 理由
youngl + 2 给你点个赞!
hidemyfaceX + 1 很有用的信息!
flag_on + 3 给你点个赞!

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
 楼主| xwjsarah30 2019-7-7 11:04:32 | 只看该作者
全局:
附件内容:

www.NoHR1044.com and www.NoS386.com Multinational Coalition Against H.R. 1044/ S. 386 - Fact Sheet
THERE IS NO DISCRIMINATION IN EB GC CARD DISTRIBUTION DUE TO SPILLOVER!
According to the Yearbook of Immigration Statistics, Indian Nationals receive 17-20% of Employment Based Green Cards (EB GC) every year due to spillover from other countries that underutilize the program. This percentage is proportional to their worldwide population, and much higher than their 7% country cap!
REASON FOR THE GC BACKLOG?
The reason that a GC backlog exists for people from India, and not from other countries, is largely because US-based IT firms have historically dominated the H1B program by flooding the program with filings on behalf of Indian nationals. Indian nationals receive approximately 75% of H1B’s annually. The sheer volume of H1B visas allocated solely to one country eventually flows into the EB GC process, resulting in about 55-60% PERM Labor Certifications (Stage 1 of the GC Process) filings annually going to Indian nationals. These statistics are clear discrimination against other countries.
NATIONALS FROM THE REST OF THE WORLD ARE MOSTLY SHUT OUT!
Indian nationals constitute about 17% of the world’s population & about 17% of the international students; but at the same time, they receive about 75% of H1B visas AND 55-60% of PERM Labor Filings. Effectively, Indian nationals DOMINATE the H1B & PERM Labor Certification process, essentially crowding out foreign nationals from 190+ other countries! The 7% country caps is the only measure curtailing the absolute monopolization of the EB Green Cards by India.
WHAT DOES HR1044/S386 ACTUALLY DO?
HR1044/S386 seeks to reallocate nearly all the EB GC to people from India for at least 12 years. But HR1044/S386 will NOT eliminate ANY backlog! It will only redistribute it from Indian nationals to other foreign-born nationals from the rest of the world. Currently there are 466K Indian nationals in the backlog (per CRS Dec 2018 report in EB/2), so it will take about 12 years for these applicants to receive their GC. As a result, every new applicant from the rest of world will be thrown into an overnight 12-year wait. With more EB GC added each year, the backlog will grow ever larger year after year.
WHAT ABOUT DIVERSITY – ETHNIC, CAREER & INDUSTRY?
HR1044/S386 will effectively wipe out ethnic and skill/industry diversity from other countries for more than 12 years as only Indian nationals will receive EB GCs in a first-come, first-serve waiting line. Additionally, since many Indians in the US work in the IT sector and have only a Bachelor’s degree from Indian universities, HR1044/ S386 will effectively prioritize applicants with foreign undergraduate degrees over US PhDs & Master’s degrees. Furthermore, because the majority of MDs and RNs are NOT from India, this bill will lead to sudden and critical shortages in underserved areas.
AREN’T THE OTHER COUNTRIES PROTECTED?
No! The transition period reserves enough visas to cover the needs of other countries only for 4 months after enactment! The “Do-No-Harm” clause does nothing and applies to a very small number of people only with approved I-140 who are waiting for their GC from other countries. Every applicant from 190+ other countries that has a decision pending for I-140 or applies for an I-140 after working or studying several years in the USA, will find himself in an overnight 12-year backlog on EB2.
HR1044/S386 Serves ONLY to Reward IT Industry Long-Term, Systemic H1B Program Abuse!
HR1044/S386 WILL WIPE OUT ETHNIC_INDUSTRY_SKILL DIVERSITY IN EB GC SYSTEM AND ENCOURAGE CONTINUED DISPLACEMENT OF AMERICAN WORKERS!

评分

参与人数 1大米 +1 收起 理由
gsqug + 1 给你点个赞!

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
 楼主| xwjsarah30 2019-7-7 11:05:00 | 只看该作者
全局:
管理员更新:
from @susan1013

我群发之后,被人直接说“take me off the list"。我个人觉得大家用同一个模版,不停地群发,不仅不能表达观点,这些议员看了之后可能会觉得被骚扰了。既然是要表达观点,最好按照别人的规则来。

以下是我群发后收到的回复。他的表达很克制了,但是估计也是被骚扰得不行了。他的建议是去当地议员网站下create一个case,这样比较得体而且有效。

This is not a productive way to share your opinion on this legislation.
Please share this with your colleagues as well.  Whoever advised you and MANY others to email over 350 congressional staffers on their personal business accounts, over and over again, is at best misinformed.
If you would like to share your opinion on an issue, you should use our website(s).  You can write Senator Kaine at www.kaine.senate.gov and you will receive a reply if you are from Virginia.. 1point3acres
One other piece of advice.  You should have people reaching out to members from their home states.  For example, constituents for Virginia should write the delegation from Virginia.
Sincerely,
您好!
本帖隐藏的内容需要积分高于 999999 才可浏览
您当前积分为 0。
使用VIP即刻解锁阅读权限或查看其他获取积分的方式
游客,您好!
本帖隐藏的内容需要积分高于 999999 才可浏览
您当前积分为 0。
VIP即刻解锁阅读权限查看其他获取积分的方式
Unlock interview details and practice with AI
Curated Interview Questions from Top Companies


回复

使用道具 举报

无效楼层,该帖已经被删除
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册账号
隐私提醒:
  • ☑ 禁止发布广告,拉群,贴个人联系方式:找人请去🔗同学同事飞友,拉群请去🔗拉群结伴,广告请去🔗跳蚤市场,和 🔗租房广告|找室友
  • ☑ 论坛内容在发帖 30 分钟内可以编辑,过后则不能删帖。为防止被骚扰甚至人肉,不要公开留微信等联系方式,如有需求请以论坛私信方式发送。
  • ☑ 干货版块可免费使用 🔗超级匿名:面经(美国面经、中国面经、数科面经、PM面经),抖包袱(美国、中国)和录取汇报、定位选校版
  • ☑ 查阅全站 🔗各种匿名方法

本版积分规则

>
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表