中级农民
- 积分
- 102
- 大米
- 颗
- 鳄梨
- 个
- 水井
- 尺
- 蓝莓
- 颗
- 萝卜
- 根
- 小米
- 粒
- 学分
- 个
- 注册时间
- 2019-2-21
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
|
我找了很久,然后想起来托福作文都是在小站的软件里做的,那个我已经卸载了,所以实在是找不到了。但是第二次托福(高分的那次)作文我是在GRE之后写的,所以或许我GRE的练习作文能有一点点帮助。
【要补充的一点是GRE比较注重辩证思维,所以会专门分一小段来做反方辩证,比如Granted that开头的句子,承认对方观点在某些情况下可能是正确的,但是托福似乎不吃这一套,反而更希望你的观点明确一些,不要太圆滑,所以这方面的内容会少一点,考试的时候应该要注意一点(这也是我听其他攻略说的,仅供参考,但我觉得有道理,毕竟托福主要考察语言,思想和逻辑差不多就行了,逻辑写的太复杂反而会容易翻车)】
我按时间先后放两篇GRE的练习作文,这两篇是我还能找到对应题目的,一篇是第一次练习,一篇是考gre前不久练习的,中间也就隔了五六篇的样子吧。
这只是我自己的练习,不是范文,(我自己猜)大概约等于GRE的3-3.5分作文或者托福25-27分水平吧!仅供参考,里面也会有低级词汇错误和逻辑不通的地方。. ----
然后再强调一下TOEFL的作文不需要像GRE一样太辩证,太辩证不好。希望不会误导你hhhh
考试加油
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%. .и
Issue1
-baidu 1point3acresQuestion:Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting you
position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position
以下正文
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
When Mondale, a great botanist who discovered the dominant gene from beans, first started growing beans in his gardon, almost no one understood what he was doing and took that as useless. And when Coleambia set off from Europe to thewest and against the usual sail direction to the India, few people were confident that he would succeed in reaching India. Actually he did failed in landing in India but consequently find the new continent of America. When these grate figures decided to embark their confusing activities, not many people took that as feasible. And similar things also exist in present days that some institutions are likely to persuade their students from getting into the area where the students are unlikely, at least in the common thought, to success. Though this is reasonable, as it do have a base of probability and expirical conclusion, I think the education institutions still need to do their best to help those students dispose their willing in the seemingly impossible area but not simply disuading them.
The schools do have a responsibily to have their students receiving the best education they could provide and the most suitable guidance in thier life development, but a school should also be aware of the feature of science development. From the view of the entire human history, the development of science, include natural science, society science,sicence of art,etc, shows a shape of surpentine, which indicate that the achievement of human society now are build on the fundamental of both success and failure. Those success are the golden briks in the important points, only depending on which the science could evolute to a higher level. But the edifice of science not only build up with golden briks but also seemingly unimportant normal briks, which may even have crack on their sufface, but it is exactly these consist up the walls and other parts making the edifice appears like an edifice. Those students who insist on searching the likely fallible area are just making those briks with obviouse flaw, but those help others in giving advice of failure, so that the golden briks will be more carefully designed and perfect. Not a wise man would ignore those peope sticking devoting their time doing those eventually failed works.
What else, the teachers in the school are not soothsayers themselves, thier eyesights are also restricted to their own abilities, though which may be relatively higher than the students'. That means the judgement by the education institutions are not correct all the time. Hence they should not disuade the students just because they hold the oppisite idea. What the education institude should do, is to help the students to learn better methods of analyzing a research topic in a logistic way, which is exactly the function a school designed to have, and thus make them have a better understanding of their judgement and choice.
Thus, though the education institude always think they are the ones to help students make the 'right' choices, its actually not correct all the time. For those thoughtful students who have a clear goal in a difficult area, the institude should do their best to support them but not disuading them if only these goals are derived after logistic and reasonal analysis. (543).google и
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Issue 2
Question:People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively..1point3acres
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement andexplain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you shouldconsider the reasons for which the statement may or may not be true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
以下正文
. check 1point3acres for more.%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Some people may argue that people should question the rules made by authority rather than accepting them passively, which is partially true because the authority may be wrong on some issues and the integral wisdom of the crowed may help to refine those rules. But the public should always bear in mind that the authority have something unique to be authority, and simply and frequently questioning the rules sometimes induce bigger problems.. 1point3acres
The authorities, always known as government, companies and science facilties, consist up of expert in certain areas. Experts are those who have devoted many years in the area and have a better understanding, far above the average level of ordinary people, of it. So the rules made by the authorities are mainly designed after scientific and logical analysis, which make it suitable to the designed situation and efficient when used. While at the same time, ordinary people, who may suspect the rule, are not necessarily qualified in this area, thus their challenges to the rule are likely to be meaningless and waste of time. For example, a driver may wonder why the car turning at the crossroad should give way to the straightly moving car, if there is one. The driver, without experience in road design or analyzing traffic accident, may think this rule useless and unconvenience, thus require the governement to delete it. But in fact, the rule is a well-designed one because the turning cars are harder to control, which, if trying to pass while a straightly moving car is coming simultaneously, is likely to cause an accident, and the position of the driver when the car is turning is the very reason that such accidents are always violent. Thus the rule made by authorities are more likely to be reasonable and work better. . Χ
What else, too much questioning may cause unnecessary turbulent on the society. With the internet widely used, it is easier for people to have their own voice on the internet, which may help the authorities do better in knowing the need of public and making better rules. But the public is not always wise, and can damage the justice of the society if too many people are wrongly questioning a rule. Discussing it more specificly, let us take an example in the law. The following example can actually happen in the real world, that a violent case, like a murder, takes place. Most of the people may think the murderer deserved death for his relentlessness, but according to the law, he may only recieve 30 years prisoning. The law is designed to obey, so it is right to obey the law and put the murderer in the prison for 30 years, but the crowd may nor satisfied with the result and question the law, which may cause the whole society excited about this and cause a turbulent, while it is actually the crowd on the wrong side. Hence the questioning of the authorities should be in a limited range to avoided meaningless damage to the society..--
But all these are not the reasons to ban all the discussion of rules. On the contrary, they mean the authorities need to guide the society to discuss the rules and learn to question the rules in a proper way, because the authority may go wrong occationally and if no one is to question the possible flaw of the rules, larger problems may appear and eventually lead to the deterioration of the whole society.
In a nutshell, the rule are not designed to be questioned al the time, but to tell people the right way to make the society develop in a health and stable way, which simultaneously require the proper questioning from people to ake the rules even better, the process of which should be under the guidance of the authorities like governemnts. |
|