楼主: 老油条
跳转到指定楼层
上一主题 下一主题
收起左侧

关于HR1044的一些事实和想法Q & A

   
全局:
“ICC是印度的国家支柱产业”

如果真是如此,那么印度真是个可悲的国家
回复

使用道具 举报

全局:
所以EB5的死活没人关心?
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
 楼主| 老油条 2019-7-12 14:41:25 来自APP | 只看该作者
全局:
young14341 发表于 2019/07/12 14:25:38
所以EB5的死活没人关心?

eb5的死活有很多人关心,但这个论坛以小留为主,家里穷没钱eb5。我认为也不该要求任何人偏离自身的利益太远,这不符合人性。eb5有充分的权利来支持这个法案,只不过你在这里找不到太多共鸣。
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
 楼主| 老油条 2019-7-12 14:42:03 来自APP | 只看该作者
全局:
请大家不要继续传播这个帖子了,没什么干货,大家看看就好了。不值得占用太多时间。
回复

使用道具 举报

全局:
我接触过一些红脖子,所以我觉得对红脖子的message应该是:法案通过,更多印度人会过来抢工作,而且抢的是高薪的IT工作,同时还会把家属也带来一起抢你们的工作,以后IT行业将全都是印度人;而且印度每22分钟就有一起强奸案,印度男人都管不好自己的下体,更多的印度人移民美国意味着你们的女儿、姐妹都会有被你强奸的可能!

这其实是件很讽刺的事:唯一的希望是反移民的红脖子。
回复

使用道具 举报

全局:
biomedicineman 发表于 2019/07/12 13:07:03
“ICC是印度的国家支柱产业”

如果真是如此,那么印度真是个可悲的国家

不然他们拼了老命死也要死在这
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
zhensofa 2019-7-13 00:24:20 | 只看该作者
全局:
大家写反对信可以参考一下这篇文章, 这个文章写的比较有理有据:
https://cis.org/North/View-Left- ... Tax-Bill-Gift-Haves

The bill favors four already lucky groups of Haves while disadvantaging everyone else:

1.the high-tech industries that use the H-1B program to increase their already high profits;
2. the big city (notably Manhattan) real estate developers in the EB-5 program;
3.rich Chinese in the same immigrant investor program; and
4.upper crust Indian nationals in the H-1B program.

The Total Losers, and What they Lose

1.American Workers. Any program change that strengthens the H-1B program, which has close to a million semi-indentured workers in it, means that fewer citizens and green card holders are hired in these reasonably well-paying jobs.

2.American Investors. The principal use of EB-5 funds is to provide what is known in the trade as "mezzanine financing", that is loans without liens, to big city real estate developers; routinely EB-5 investors get 1 or at most 2 percent for their money, while the market rate is as high as 10 percent. So U.S. investors are being shunned in favor of EB-5 ones.

I must say that this is not a population to spend many tears on; these are passive investors who probably do not know that they are being discriminated against as they have many other investment opportunities. Though I have been writing about EB-5 for years, it did not dawn on me until recently that this was a group hurt by the program; it certainly is not an organized group.

3.Would-be immigrants from the rest of the world. Generally, for every HR-1044-favored would-be migrant who would get a visa faster there is a non-favored would-be migrant who will have to wait much longer than previously. These are in both employment-based and in family-based migrant categories, so if you are an Argentinian, a Belizean, a Canadian or a Dane, or an Estonian or a Fijian, and you have a green card visa waiting for you, HR-1044 will set back your dreams for years.
回复

使用道具 举报

全局:
已签名。下周研究下怎么打电话。
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册账号
隐私提醒:
  • ☑ 禁止发布广告,拉群,贴个人联系方式:找人请去🔗同学同事飞友,拉群请去🔗拉群结伴,广告请去🔗跳蚤市场,和 🔗租房广告|找室友
  • ☑ 论坛内容在发帖 30 分钟内可以编辑,过后则不能删帖。为防止被骚扰甚至人肉,不要公开留微信等联系方式,如有需求请以论坛私信方式发送。
  • ☑ 干货版块可免费使用 🔗超级匿名:面经(美国面经、中国面经、数科面经、PM面经),抖包袱(美国、中国)和录取汇报、定位选校版
  • ☑ 查阅全站 🔗各种匿名方法

本版积分规则

>
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表