📣 独立日限时特惠: VIP通行证立减$68
查看: 996| 回复: 0
跳转到指定楼层
上一主题 下一主题
收起左侧

反对S386/HR1044的一个模版

🔗
x_s | 只看该作者 |倒序浏览
全局:

注册一亩三分地论坛,查看更多干货!

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号?注册账号

x
以下是我写的模版,已经发给议员了。大家如果觉得写得不算太差可以参考以下。大家发邮件的时候要注意不要照抄他人模版,要有一些自己的话,而且记得加上自己的地址,不然秘书/实习生会扔掉的。
我写了diversity也写了对美国企业不好对ICC好,所以哪个党的议员都可以发?

Dear Senator XX,

I am writing to urge you to vote NO for bill S386/HR1044 “Fairness for high skilled immigrant act of 2019”. Bill S386/HR1044 will benefit IT consultancies mostly based in India tremendously, while immensely hurt the interest of American businesses and workers, and non Indian skilled workers who intend to immigrate to America.

If Bill S386/HR1044 passed, it will give tremendous gains to the tech consultancies mostly from India while hurting American tech companies. Historically, consultancies have abused the H1B and EB2/3 program to bring cheap labor to the US. Some of them committed visa fraud. Consultancies bring down the IT cost while US tech giants that are willing to pay great amount of money qualified foreign employees have great trouble in bringing in those employees. Removing the per country quota suddenly without implementing comprehensive immigration reform that prevents abuse will increase the green card backlog to qualified skilled workers not from India to 10 years, dissuade them from joining American businesses. Thereby hurting American companies ability to attract and retain the best talent from around the world. According to Mary Meeker, the General Partner of esteemed venture capital firm KPCB, 60% of highest valued tech companies is founded by immigrants or their children from over the world. To create a great contribution to American economy, those talented individuals already need to get through the extremely cumbersome immigration process. If Bill S386/HR1044 passed, many of the talented workers intended to work in the US would quit since a path to permanent residency would be blocked for over 10 years.

On the other side, the companies that treat IT as a cost center and more easily displace American workers and hire consultants from India if the bill pass since consultancies can bring low-cost labor easier by continuing their fraudulent practices. Furthermore, there are other immigrant workers not in IT industry, such as RNs, MDs, and pharmaceutical researchers. The bill will increase the shortage of these type of workers. The bill will only benefit the tech consultancies while harming American tech companies and other industries.  

Bill S386/HR1044, while intended to be a bandit fixing the broken immigration process, creates more harm than good. Without a comprehensive immigration reform that is merit base and an increase of the total number of green card issued for the EB category, completely remove per country quota suddenly will ruin diversity, harm American businesses and only benefit IT consultancies. I urge you to vote no to S386/HR1044 or at least propose significant amendment to. For instance, increase the per country quota but not completely eliminated it, so that it will be fair to Indian workers already in the backlog while not completely eliminate the possibility of non-Indian nationals from getting EB based green card in the ten years after the first 3 year transition period. Besides, merit based rules to prevent abuse in the H1B program and EB green card and the total quota of both. Only with a comprehensive overhaul of the current system will fix the current issues while passing S386/HR1044 in its current state will create more disaster than good.

Yours Sincerely,
XX


上一篇:建议F1不要在任何会体现移民倾向的地方留下真实姓名
下一篇:希望大家都能在朋友圈宣传下这个版块
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册账号
隐私提醒:
  • ☑ 禁止发布广告,拉群,贴个人联系方式:找人请去🔗同学同事飞友,拉群请去🔗拉群结伴,广告请去🔗跳蚤市场,和 🔗租房广告|找室友
  • ☑ 论坛内容在发帖 30 分钟内可以编辑,过后则不能删帖。为防止被骚扰甚至人肉,不要公开留微信等联系方式,如有需求请以论坛私信方式发送。
  • ☑ 干货版块可免费使用 🔗超级匿名:面经(美国面经、中国面经、数科面经、PM面经),抖包袱(美国、中国)和录取汇报、定位选校版
  • ☑ 查阅全站 🔗各种匿名方法

本版积分规则

>
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表