注册一亩三分地论坛,查看更多干货!
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号?注册账号 
x
本帖最后由 地里的生活菌 于 2022-1-4 12:00 编辑
避雷!
买的premium修改PS,4天delivery。改了一些语法错误。一共6处修改,只有两个是给意见。给的意见还是“it does not make sense at all” 和 "why data attracts you, what program you are applying"。尽管我说了很多学校要SOP和PS,why school和why program之类的很多问题我都在SOP里回答了,我也把SOP发给他了。但是他好像并没看,不然也不会一直说我没写why program。我反复和他说需要更细节的建议而不是只是说这个段落不行。现在在退款中。
以下是我俩的一部分聊天:
Me:
I understood that you will not write things for me and I was not expecting that. If you read my SOP, you will find out most of your question are answered in my SOP, such as which program I am applying for, why program, and what do I want to do specifically.In the message I sent you, I stated that most of the program asks for both SOP and PS, and the content should not overlap.
For the blind movie part, you commented it is unclear, but I do not know which part. I stated the reason that I added this paragraph is to meet one of the description of UCB's PS. If you think this paragraph is not useful at all, a better suggestion would be what kind of content should I be included.
rese1202:
D you have an updated draft to attach to this revision request?
Me:
I do not have updated draft. I keep saying that your suggestion could to be more detailed. and I do not think you read over all the message and document I sent you. Could you redo your revision. Instead of saying something does not make sense, a better suggestion would what kind of content would be better.
rese1202:
Engaging in the editing process is a key aspect of getting to a successful draft. I have posed very specific questions for you to answer to flesh out your draft. In doing so, you can maximize the benefit of the editing process. It makes no sense for me to edit the same draft again when I've already provided actionable feedback that you've not addressed.
|