楼主: 匿名
跳转到指定楼层
上一主题 下一主题
收起左侧

[职场感言] 转一个blind上的大佬对狗和亚麻的看法

   
地里匿名用户
🔗
匿名用户-D2IX6  | 添加认证 | 2022-10-1 13:15:06
一边是员工整天在xhs晒鸡肉怎么好吃 Bay View office怎么炫酷 连打牌/狼人杀/剧本杀都要跑到公司订个会议室

另一边业务一盘散沙 裁的裁砍的砍 ceo整天就知道给印度人吹成功学
. 1point3acres.com
少数能干活的被同事嘲笑卷王 想推个新项目分分秒被组里元老turn down怕你抢升职

真的很怀念当初那个lean fast and fun 的🐶
回复

使用道具 举报

地里匿名用户
🔗
匿名用户-QHZ4L  | 添加认证 | 2022-10-1 13:59:03 来自APP
谷歌和亚麻商业底层上不是一个行业。谷歌还处在人无我有,人有我优的阶段。竞争少,定价权大,所以需要少数足够优秀的大神推动整个公司和行业的发展。一个人产生的效益抵得上数十甚至上百个平庸工程师。而亚麻很多部门是实打实的传统行业,竞争激烈,科技用来支撑运营,背后难度不大却极花时间的事儿非常多。所以很厉害的人在这产生的效益有限。亚麻top down,work backward的商业逻辑是行业特性产生的结果(人优我廉)。控制成本扩大个人,产出而不是扶植大神。
你看谷歌gcp忙不忙?

评分

参与人数 1大米 +1 收起 理由
Alan888 + 1 赞一个

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
brtt13 2022-10-1 14:15:20 来自APP | 只看该作者
全局:
亚麻的生存模式就是价廉物美,G的生存方式是一个突破吃好几年,所以文化不同很正常
回复

使用道具 举报

地里匿名用户
🔗
匿名用户-9TQZB  | 添加认证 | 2022-10-1 14:28:32
匿名用户 发表于 2022-9-30 18:04. 1point 3 acres
嗯,对投资者来说可能亚麻的模式见效更快,特别是对已经成规模的公司
不过狗的模式也许更有助于创新,只 ...

狗家的模式在很多地方都变味了:.google  и
- bottom up: 所以很多比较精明的人都是在自己瞎搞新项目, 然后给自己的 promotion 创造材料. 但是最终绝大多数产品都是失败的. 大多数人 promote 后也毫不关心产品以后怎么样.
- being nice to others: 产品没前途也没有人站出来说不行. 所以各种失败的产品也不停推出.. 1point3acres
- 吸引来各种 coaster. 就不用细说了, 基本地里 想去狗的人, 以及天天吐槽🐶的人, 都是抓着这个点.
回复

使用道具 举报

地里匿名用户
🔗
匿名用户-YSGQN  | 添加认证 | 2022-10-1 14:32:16
其他大公司像是蘋果、IBM、Cisco的類型是偏向Amazon還是Google呢?
回复

使用道具 举报

地里匿名用户
🔗
匿名用户-FFIHG  | 添加认证 | 2022-10-1 14:49:32 来自APP
匿名用户 发表于 2022-09-30 22:59:03
谷歌和亚麻商业底层上不是一个行业。谷歌还处在人无我有,人有我优的阶段。竞争少,定价权大,所以需要少数足够优秀的大神推动整个公司和行业的发展。一个人产生的效益抵得上数十甚至上百个平庸工程师。而亚麻很多部
说的不错
说到底. .и
谷歌的基因还是追求创新,所以提供相对宽松的工作环境,鼓励多样性
而亚麻需要追求效率来增加产出,所以标准化工具化很重要
类似于美国与中国的特点
回复

使用道具 举报

地里匿名用户
🔗
匿名用户-9HBWD  | 添加认证 | 2022-10-1 15:39:20 来自APP
匿名用户 发表于 2022-09-30 20:11:25
对打工人来说. Waral dи,
很明显
希望狗家这种以员工为本的公司越多越好
前提是公司有足够的利润来养活员工
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
老妖zm 2022-10-1 17:18:18 | 只看该作者
全局:
亚麻就是国内的阿里。
阿里文化输出之后,整个行业都会pua化。
原以为这只是华人特例,但是行业一旦下行,卷+pua文化输出才是普世价值。

. ----简而言之,90%的工程师都认为自己是above average的, 行业泡沫一旦消失, 40%的人肯定要被迫去卷。
回复

使用道具 举报

地里匿名用户
🔗
匿名用户-XSUGN  | 添加认证 | 2022-10-2 01:19:01
本帖最后由 匿名 于 2022-10-1 13:27 编辑

原帖不能再修改了,添加些新的更新,感觉这些回答非常真实有意义.1point3acres
Q: Curious about your perspective in G for same question?
    But frankly what you said about exec reviews being a cross examination is terrible! You need a collaborative mindset to solve problems. Looks like Amazon    leaders don't have that?
A: Google is different yes. There is more a sense that everyone is trying to help each other. It is just a different style. Like if you were on a sports team and had a really tough coach. ..
At Google there is much more about how you treat each other, especially your team. So not just what you get done, but how. And relationship and earning trust. There is as much as I have seen much less politics too, so you do need to be technical and make good decisions. As much as its about relationships, you can't play politics.

By play politics, I mean say things that make you or your team look good. Like how politicians are really careful about what they say, and then people are like that sounded good but then they realize it didn't give them much useful information. Versus a lot of us engineers will just say what's on our mind and even though it's right, it puts our foot in our mouth.
Example if I didn't play politics then I could give an answer to this question like "You could just lookup the term" or "if you don't know what means then you shouldn't be a manager". Or something like that..
In truth, when you become a good manager, you can say the right things without hiding information. But most people either hide information or don't say the right thing. It's hard.


Q: I can only say one thing about Amazon: It’s not a collaborative environment. Your teammates are your enemies at Amazon. I don’t like to treat anyone like that or be treated either.
A: The teams I worked on, not everyone was an enemy. Its not like when you go work at Amazon then suddenly you become a bad person. But the PIP culture and the stress do make you more likely to turn bad. And because Amazon culture doesn't reward being kind, its not a core value like at Google. But I did like the people I work with and they were not all out to backstab.
The learnings I had at Amazon are about how to get things done efficiently and not give up. The difference is at Google people will give up easier or be unwilling to cut corners. At Amazon it is like life and death so you don't have the option to give up. You either get it done or you might as well look for another job. And this happens frequently so you get good or get out.. From 1point 3acres bbs
The things I learned at Google is it is ok to sacrifice short term for long term. You can have backbone and say you're not going to do this because it will make things worse down the road. And at Google you really really really need to know the technical details. You can't fake or politic your way out of things. Because even your proposal solves the problem, someone will inspect it and say wait but this is not the right scalable long term solution. Whereas at Amazon it is just solve the problem and move to the next one.
These are opposite cultures. But it is good to have both experiences. Because then I can weigh between them and make balanced decisions.

Q: What’s the engineer quality between A and G?
A: Quality of both is high. Depends what you want them to do though. If I have to make a big scalable service and make sure that it runs well and that issues will be solved immediately when they come up, I will definitely get Amazon SDE's. Any Amazon SDE who has survived a few years is dependable. The problem though with Amazon SDE is you get so used to fighting fires and taking shortcuts that it's hard to think big.
Whereas Google values "cognitive" a lot. If I want someone who will solve really tough problems or I don't know what the problem is to be solved, then I will hire someone from Google. If I want someone who can think long term and create a good design upfront then Google it is.

    These are extremes, not everyone at Google and Amazon are like the above. Ideally I would have a mix of both. The Amazon SDE's will think the Googlers go too slow. The Google SWE's will think the Amazonians can't think long term.
.
Q: Is there a path for you to get to L8 at Google? Curious what your manager says about this when you ask.
A: Yes definitely yes. And we have had promos here to L8. It is really just about sustained track record. I am doing well and every year we talk about the gaps. It is a long journey though, getting to director is not easy and there is a lot of opportunity to do damage if I get promoted and don't do a good job. But yes yes yes, I know a lot of L7's at Google and they all are confident they have path to L8. And a few of them have gotten there these past 1-2 years. . 1point 3 acres

Q: I'm an SDE at Amazon and recently passed the onsite interviews at Google. I'm currently in "Team Matching".
     What should I do to increase the likelihood of finding a team and getting an offer?
A: I have so many awful team matching calls where candidates come unprepared. These candidates don't understand the basics that it's still an interview and what they say makes an impression. They ask lots of questions about on call and WLB and perks. They think the TM is about them.
Don't do that. Research the project. Ask questions about the project and tech. Managers love to talk about their challenges and roadmap. When theamagwr answers, don't just say OK. At least say That sounds interesting and aligns with my interests because ...
Good luck!

Q: What slowed your career progression the most?
A: That is a tough question. I did well at both companies. At L7, promotions are also about opportunities. You need to have a big enough org. You need to be given a big enough charter. Sometimes you have to fight for those or look around internally to find an opportunity. Personally, I just don't think too much about career progression, I think it can lead to bad behaviors. Like I leave an org that I like because I want to get promoted faster. I get paid enough and I like what I am doing and I like the people in my org and the people I work with. Those are enough. I left Amazon because I didn't have those things so maybe I am too sensitive about those though.. 1point3acres
. 1point 3acres
Q: How to best prepare for em interviews at Google? As someone who converted from SDE to SDM 2 years ago.
A: No magic. The LP questions at Amazon are a good start. But Google culture is different so adapt your answers. Tech side is similar to Amazon, practice your system design. Since you were a SDE recently, at least you don't have to practice much coding. I would be most skeptical of you for lack of EM experience since you are 2 years from SDE, so you need to have good answers about depth of experience for the last 2 years.
回复

使用道具 举报

全局:
理想和现实不一样,以前的🐶代表理想,亚麻代表现实,在现实面前,理想可能不堪一击。接受现实比较好
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册账号
职场达人
  • ↑ 本版用于讨论职场各种干货话题,闲聊请去🔗聊聊或者🔗匿名版
  • ❌ 本版严禁水贴,引战,发布广告,拉群,贴个人联系方式,扣分无警告
  • ☑ 求职、面经等去 🔗北美求职和 🔗回国求职大区,刷题和学习请去 🔗终身学习大区
  • ☑ 请去专版发布 🔗内推, 🔗招聘信息,和讨论 🔗创业内容
  • ☑ PIP / DevList/ Need Support 等话题也已开设 🔗专版

本版积分规则

>
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表