查看: 7386| 回复: 18
跳转到指定楼层
上一主题 下一主题
收起左侧

[选组选Offer] 昨天被拒,今天又要team match

全局:

2022(10-12月)-ME博士+3-5年 | 猎头| 码农类General全职@google

注册一亩三分地论坛,查看更多干货!

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号?注册账号

x
上个礼拜完成了谷歌onsite。感觉面的一般,有的轮很好,有的很差。所以不抱希望了。
果不其然昨天给结果说拒了,说mix feedback. 不能说具体每个人的评价或评分。

戏剧性的是,今天又打电话说有个manager想谈谈。收到邮件Team Fit Call with xxx.
. 1point3acres
地里有类似的情况吗?没有过HC的可以直接跟经理谈?谈好了还有希望吗?哎楼主的小心脏啊

上一篇:AMD VIDEO ENCODER - IP Verification
下一篇:请问一下codeSignal 的general test 和非general test之间有冷冻期吗
推荐
monaziyi 2022-11-10 10:30:51 | 只看该作者
全局:
微信用户_pc10s 发表于 2022-11-9 16:57
team match才几天。暂时没消息。大概率会挂,现在竞争真的很激烈

你应该面得是L5+吧,老年总体还是稀缺的,祝早日好消息
回复

使用道具 举报

推荐
 楼主| 微信用户_pc10s 2022-11-10 11:39:08 来自APP | 只看该作者
全局:
monaziyi 发表于 2022-11-09 18:30:51
你应该面得是L5+吧,老年总体还是稀缺的,祝早日好消息
我比你们算是“老年” 😂谢谢鼓励,愿我们都有好运连连
回复

使用道具 举报

推荐
 楼主| 微信用户_pc10s 2022-11-4 02:03:59 来自APP | 只看该作者
全局:
cfwang1987 发表于 2022-11-02 19:47:17
recruiter 看到 mix feedback, 加上当时又没有HM看上你, 就认定你会跪, 所以teammatch不想费力气做了,  但是现在有HM觉得你背景吻合要你, 那么他就会在材料上陈述理
看到一个帖子
..
Sample size - 52. These are from candidates who have made it to Hiring Committee (HC), either before or after Team Match (TM), and have received an HC decision.
. 1point3acres
% received an HC approval - 73%. This number is much higher than I expected, so I suspect that there could be some selection bias here - folks who got rejected may be taking a break from Blind or less likely to report a result. Also, it is possible that Google relaxed its HC bar, but I find this unlikely.

% went to TM before HC - 37%. We've been hearing a recent change that more candidates are sent for TM before HC, and we see this in the data. Based on what I've read on Blind, this is usually because the on-site feedback was mixed, a new process is kicked in (we do see candidates with primarily SH/H were also sent to TM first), or it is for a higher-level role (L6+).

Offer %, HC-first vs.TM-first - 73% vs. 74%. In terms of the likelihood of getting an offer, I don't see a big difference between those who went to HC first vs. TM first.

% offers were downleveled - 37%. When breaking down this number by HC-first vs. TM-first, we see a pretty big difference - 29% (HC-first) vs. 50% (TM-first). This could be due to the TM-first group tends to have mixed on-site feedback, hence a higher chance of being downleveled.

Another interesting finding is that for those who needed to redo one or more rounds, only 1 in 11 received a reject (from the TM-first group). So if you are asked to redo, you are very likely to get an offer. This makes me question how effective is the redo mechanism, as it almost always leads to a hire decision. Or maybe it is just because my sample size is too small.
. Waral dи,
****** New Findings ******

Previously, we see that the HC-first group has a slightly lower redo rate compared to the TM-first group. However, when we have a larger sample size, the 2 numbers converged to 21%. Redo requests can come from HC or the recruiter before HC review, and that is not differentiated in this poll.

Regarding the 73% approval rate from HC, at first, I thought it was higher than I expected. However, in the latest communication with my recruiter, she mentioned that most of the results from HC are approvals. With this anecdotal information, I think the 73% HC approval rate from our data is not too unreasonable. And remember, this excludes all the candidates who were rejected right after onsite with no HC review.

Lastly, seems like HC and TM are not necessarily sequential, as I have an impression from my recruiter that an HC review is scheduled for my packet, and at the same time it is already being circulated for the team match. This is contrary to our common understanding that TM won't start until a positive decision is made from HC, or vice versa.
回复

使用道具 举报

全局:
最好确认一下级别
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
 楼主| 微信用户_pc10s 2022-11-3 06:28:10 来自APP | 只看该作者
全局:
哈哈哈 感觉你一直在team match。所以很有经验!聊什么能帮助拿offer呐?. 1point3acres.com
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
cfwang1987 2022-11-3 07:07:48 | 只看该作者
全局:
老兄, 你是上礼拜几面的, 一共几轮感觉比较差?
回复

使用道具 举报

全局:
微信用户_pc10s 发表于 2022-11-02 15:28:10
哈哈哈 感觉你一直在team match。所以很有经验!聊什么能帮助拿offer呐?
他们家去年给钱太少,我不理他们了
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
 楼主| 微信用户_pc10s 2022-11-3 08:40:37 来自APP | 只看该作者
全局:
cfwang1987 发表于 2022-11-02 16:07:48
老兄, 你是上礼拜几面的, 一共几轮感觉比较差?
上礼拜三,四。一轮反应很好,就是我问有需要改进的吗,说没有,都很棒,坚持优点。一轮感觉很一般,就是问的很深,回答得很浅,是domain related。 其他的都算正常
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
 楼主| 微信用户_pc10s 2022-11-3 08:41:51 来自APP | 只看该作者
全局:
柯基101 发表于 2022-11-02 17:29:53
他们家去年给钱太少,我不理他们了
我传统行业干习惯了,挣得不多,付出的也少啊。谷歌起码比传统行业钱多些吧…
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
cfwang1987 2022-11-3 09:01:34 | 只看该作者
全局:
Domain knowledge没回答上来这不算什么吧. 原来是跳槽. 地里说新流程跳槽好像先teammatch, 然后再送Hiring Committee. 我是NG上周二面的, 我有一轮面的不行, 对面是个国人, 题很新, 但不难, 一下卡住了, 最优解不是我自己做出来的, 而是对方提示的. 估计完蛋了. 到今天都还没消息. 今年下半年毕业真难, 面很多onsite都挂了.
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
 楼主| 微信用户_pc10s 2022-11-3 09:17:16 来自APP | 只看该作者
全局:
cfwang1987 发表于 2022-11-02 18:01:34
Domain knowledge没回答上来这不算什么吧. 原来是跳槽. 地里说新流程跳槽好像先teammatch, 然后再送Hiring Committee. 我是NG上周二面的, 我有一轮面的不行,
我还以为一般就是面的很好的,直接送HC,然后team match。像我这种mix review 的,看有没有HM support。没消息也许是好消息,因为拒一般都很快
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
cfwang1987 2022-11-3 10:47:17 | 只看该作者
全局:
recruiter 看到 mix feedback, 加上当时又没有HM看上你, 就认定你会跪, 所以teammatch不想费力气做了,  但是现在有HM觉得你背景吻合要你, 那么他就会在材料上陈述理由为什么要你, 如果陈述合情合理能弥补mix feedback, HC就会让你过.
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册账号
隐私提醒:
  • ☑ 禁止发布广告,拉群,贴个人联系方式:找人请去🔗同学同事飞友,拉群请去🔗拉群结伴,广告请去🔗跳蚤市场,和 🔗租房广告|找室友
  • ☑ 论坛内容在发帖 30 分钟内可以编辑,过后则不能删帖。为防止被骚扰甚至人肉,不要公开留微信等联系方式,如有需求请以论坛私信方式发送。
  • ☑ 干货版块可免费使用 🔗超级匿名:面经(美国面经、中国面经、数科面经、PM面经),抖包袱(美国、中国)和录取汇报、定位选校版
  • ☑ 查阅全站 🔗各种匿名方法

本版积分规则

>
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表