楼主: 匿名
跳转到指定楼层
上一主题 下一主题
收起左侧

[裁员] 狗确认不是随机裁员!

   
全局:
小白兔兔 发表于 2023-01-23 19:02:50
十几年的L4/L5既没有身份之忧,也很有可能已经财务自由
那正好-他们也比较不怕被裁,dat algo works
回复

使用道具 举报

全局:
小白兔兔 发表于 2023-1-24 11:02
十几年的L4/L5既没有身份之忧,也很有可能已经财务自由

弱弱地问一下这财务自由一般最低是多少?
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
foreteller 2023-1-24 22:05:47 | 只看该作者
全局:
本帖最后由 foreteller 于 2023-1-24 09:07 编辑

CNBC 的报道PICHAI在TOWN HALL meeting 说了点裁员的decision making process,绝对不是随机的:
-baidu 1point3acres
After moving the conversation to job cuts, Pichai offered some explanation for how he and the executive team made their decisions..

Pichai said he consulted with the founders and controlling shareholders, Sergey Brin and Larry Page, as well as the board of directors.

Pichai said 2021 marked “one of the strongest years we’ve ever had in the history of the company,” with 41% revenue growth. Google increased head count to match that expansion, and Pichai said the company was assuming growth would persist.

“In that context, we made a set of decisions that might have been right if the trends continued,” he said. “You have to remember if the trend had continued and we had not hired to keep pace, we would fall behind in many areas as a company.”


Executives said 750 senior leaders were involved in the process, adding it took a few weeks to determine who would be laid off.

“We have over 30,000 managers at Google and to consult with all of them would have made this an open process where it would have taken additional weeks or even months to come to a decision,” said Fiona Cicconi, Google’s chief people officer, at the meeting. “We wanted to get certainty sooner.”

Regarding the criteria for cuts, Cicconi said execs looked at areas where the work was necessary, but the company had too many people as well as places where the work itself wasn’t critical. Cicconi said the company considered “skill set, time in role where experience or relationships are relevant and matter, productivity indicators like sales quotas and performance history.”.1point3acres

Pichai indicated there would be executive compensation cuts but provided limited details. He said all senior vice presidents “will see a very significant reduction in their annual bonus” this year.
.
“The more senior you are, the more your compensation is tied to performance,” he said. “You can reduce your equity grants if performance is not great.”


Before the job cuts, Google had made the decision to pay out 80% of bonuses this month with the rest expected in March or April. In prior years, the full bonus was paid in January.
回复

使用道具 举报

地里匿名用户
🔗
匿名用户-ZNSSJ  | 添加认证 | 2023-1-24 23:15:19 来自APP
虽然但是 哪家裁员都不可能随机裁吧 多少都和project 盈利,performance,tenure有关
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
nevarofred 2023-1-24 23:17:24 | 只看该作者
全局:
夏日柠檬红茶 发表于 2023-1-23 21:54
"比如说好十几年了还只有L4, L5的那种" —— 不想上去是怕压力太大吗

怕技术荒废了。。。
回复

使用道具 举报

地里匿名用户
🔗
匿名用户-X2ISJ  | 添加认证 | 2023-1-24 23:35:42
有没有可能其他公司早就在深潭里了,而狗是科技公司最后的一块遮羞布?
回复

使用道具 举报

地里匿名用户
🔗
匿名用户-KFO2E  | 添加认证 | 2023-1-25 00:11:54 来自APP
随机裁员是为了避免法律纠纷

要不然 你用什么理由裁员都容易惹上官司
回复

使用道具 举报

地里匿名用户
🔗
匿名用户-VNFVR  | 添加认证 | 2023-1-25 01:08:39
LSC_ 发表于 2023-1-23 18:56. .и
我觉得有脑子的公司都不会裁员采用随机算法来决定吧?合乎逻辑的做法肯定是留下牛逼能干的,裁掉摸鱼和实力 ...

合乎逻辑但是不好听的真实是,
经理会留下特能干的20%,舔狗 50%, 还有嫡系10%, 剩下的滚蛋
回复

使用道具 举报

全局:
匿名用户 发表于 2023-01-24 09:08:39
合乎逻辑但是不好听的真实是,. 1point 3acres
经理会留下特能干的20%,舔狗 50%, 还有嫡系10%, 剩下的滚蛋
这次裁员是最顶端的人做的决策,估计是按算法出来的。这些svp根本不认识裁掉的人,遑论判断谁能干谁舔狗了

评分

参与人数 1大米 +1 收起 理由
微信用户_o8ofh + 1 赞一个

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
Emol 2023-1-25 01:28:19 来自APP | 只看该作者
全局:
匿名用户 发表于 2023-01-23 18:45:48. 1point 3 acres
现在看来很多
1. 在狗呆的年数很高,
2. 职业进展很少(在一个level呆了很多年)
可是我知道的人中有16.5年的staff被裁,这种算什么呢?
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册账号
职场达人
  • ↑ 本版用于讨论职场各种干货话题,闲聊请去🔗聊聊或者🔗匿名版
  • ❌ 本版严禁水贴,引战,发布广告,拉群,贴个人联系方式,扣分无警告
  • ☑ 求职、面经等去 🔗北美求职和 🔗回国求职大区,刷题和学习请去 🔗终身学习大区
  • ☑ 请去专版发布 🔗内推, 🔗招聘信息,和讨论 🔗创业内容
  • ☑ PIP / DevList/ Need Support 等话题也已开设 🔗专版

本版积分规则

>
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表