请问CSPA新政后CP模式的锁龄时间？发现如果EB1排期太久就遇到一个大难题

国内申请的EB1A，现在处于NVC审理阶段，PD22年8月17，现遇到一个大难题，在地里潜水了几天，现看看如果真出现极端情况，地里有没有能好的解决方案。
先说说润原因：

本人在国内属于那种很看不惯某组织的那种人，一直后悔零几年没有随着加拿大技术移民热潮出去，但一直希望孩子能够出去，尤其是看到公司老板身为高校教授，坚决不让孩子在国内上大学以后，也依然让孩子在高中时候就选择了国际体系的私立学校，孩子也于2000年申请了几所欧美大学，因为疫情原因，GAP了一年最后21年选择了美国的一所理工学校。后来知道在美国毕业后要获得绿卡也并不容易，加上公司另外一个副总在几年就为孩子办了EB5（还没排到），于是有了靠自己帮他留下的想法，只是当时并不强烈，也不知道有什么途径。转机出现在去年，由于本人工作地和家不在一个城市，以及出差原因需要经常飞来飞去，于是疫情三年亲身经历了太多魔幻事件，4月被封控在深圳一个月的期间，偶然机会得知有可能通过EB1A办理全家移民，于是便找了个中介办理，还算幸运，由于中介的弱智和疏忽经历了两次RFE后，与圣诞节那天获批。
遇到的难题：
孩子在去年春节选课的时候，由于感染了新冠，被隔离了半个多月，错过了选课，孩子有特别马虎，还错过了学校发的催促邮件，于是学校给把学籍取消了，F1也就跟着失效了。虽然学校后面给恢复了学籍，并让重新选课，但申请F1激活被拒绝，加上申请EB1的时候中介说的非常肯定不会有问题，于是就让孩子向学校申请休学一学期后回国，准备直接用绿卡上学。孩子今年8月28就满21岁，处于超龄边界，因此在和中介签合同时强调了如果孩子不能随着去，我就不会申请，由于当时没有排期，中介看我的材料后说才采用PP模式应该是可以的，现在出现了排期，也不知道CSPA新政CP模式怎么锁龄，因此在此寻求帮助。
1. 据说原来CP模式，锁龄是按NVC缴费和和审理通过后算的，网上看到有些中介发的文章好像也是那样，如果保持不变，那我就不用担心。不知道地里有没有知道是否还是这样。
2. 如果锁龄按排期到面试后来算，年底还没排到，那就孩子就超龄了，这时是不是重新申请F1也不行了？因为F1是要求没有移民倾向的。
3. 孩子在19年申请过B1去过一趟美国，如果申请不到F1，可以用B1过去吗？过去后有可能在申请转F1吗？
4. 如果以上方案都不行，那孩子只能重新申请去欧洲学校了，也意味着我自己辛苦申请的EB1也只能浪费了。

可能有点啰嗦，请见谅，谢谢大家！

微信用户_95d099d 发表于 2023-3-10 19:26
真好 怎麼我就沒有這種為孩子操碎了心的父母

多数中国父母都是这样的吧。就这么一个孩子，小时候身体不好，受了很多苦，我自己也是，从小身体不好，家里还是最穷的那种，因此慢慢自己打拼出一点点名堂后，就不希望孩子同我一样一生都在这样的压力中度过，尤其是很多事情看着特别难受恶心还无论为力

你这个问题太小众了，估计地里大部分都不清楚情况，EB5的移民群懂的人应该多一些

真好+1 我如果有个这样的爹不知道能少走多少弯路

真好 怎麼我就沒有這種為孩子操碎了心的父母

荷花的刺 发表于 2023-03-10 05:34:34
多数中国父母都是这样的吧。就这么一个孩子，小时候身体不好，受了很多苦，我自己也是，从小身体不好，家里还是最穷的那种，因此慢慢自己打拼出一点点名堂后，就不希望孩子同我一样一生都在这样的压力中度过，尤其是

我就沒有⋯⋯一直以來都靠自己好累喔

羡慕有楼主这样自我奉献的爹啊+1，以下是2/14日刚改革的信息。

WASHINGTON—U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has issued guidance in the USCIS Policy Manual to update when an immigrant visa number “becomes available” for the purpose of calculating a noncitizen’s age in certain situations under the Child Status Protection Act (CSPA).

For a child to obtain lawful permanent resident status in the United States based on their parent’s approved petition for a family-sponsored or employment-based visa, the child generally must be under the age of 21. If the child turns 21 and “ages out” during the immigration process, the child generally is no longer eligible to immigrate with the parent based on the parent’s petition.

Congress enacted the CSPA to protect certain noncitizen children from losing eligibility to obtain lawful permanent resident status based on an approved visa petition by providing a method to calculate the child’s age that considers when an immigrant visa number “becomes available.” The Department of State’s Visa Bulletin is used to determine when a visa number becomes available. The Visa Bulletin has two charts – the Dates for Filing chart and the Final Action Date chart. Under the previous CSPA guidance, USCIS considered a visa available for purposes of the CSPA age calculation based only on the Final Action Date chart, even if a noncitizen could apply for adjustment of status using the earlier date in the “Dates for Filing” chart.

This USCIS policy change is effective immediately and applies to pending applications. Therefore, some noncitizens with a pending application may now have a CSPA age that is under 21 based on this change. For example, between October and December of 2020, certain noncitizens were permitted to file their adjustment of status applications under the Dates for Filing chart of the Visa Bulletin. However, the Final Action Date chart never advanced sufficiently for their applications to be approved. These noncitizens filed their adjustment of status applications with the requisite fee without knowing whether the CSPA would benefit them.

Under this new guidance, USCIS will now use the Dates for Filing chart to calculate these noncitizens’ ages for CSPA purposes, which provides these noncitizens with more certainty about their eligibility to adjust status. If these noncitizens are eligible to adjust status because of the change in policy and they have filed for adjustment of status, they will also be eligible to apply for employment and travel authorization based on their pending adjustment of status application, and they generally will not lose previously issued employment or travel authorization.

Noncitizens may file a motion to reopen their previously denied adjustment of status application with USCIS by using Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion. Noncitizens must generally file motions to reopen within 30 days of the decision. For a motion filed more than 30 days after the denial, USCIS may, in its discretion, excuse the untimely filing of the motion if the noncitizen demonstrates that the delay was reasonable and was beyond the noncitizen’s control.

This Policy Manual update will not prevent all children from aging out before an immigrant visa is available to them, nor will it prevent children from losing nonimmigrant status derived from their parents upon reaching the actual age of 21. USCIS continues to explore all options available under the law to aid this population. For example, the Department of Homeland Security regulatory agenda includes an anticipated notice of proposed rulemaking on improving the regulations governing adjustment of status to lawful permanent residence and related immigration benefits.

祝你成功早日脱离文明洼地。
看了下这两天到新闻那地方真没救了😢

黯星云 发表于 2023-03-10 10:08:41
祝你成功早日脱离文明洼地。
看了下这两天到新闻那地方真没救了

是的，在这，除非是属于某组织的既得利益群体，否则就不可能有安全感，而不是地里某些人说的那样有多少钱在一线城市就可以幸福，任何法律都可以分分钟修改，大家可以去看看宪法的几次修订就明白了

Sunny12 发表于 2023-03-10 10:02:09
羡慕有楼主这样自我奉献的爹啊+1，以下是2/14日刚改革的信息。

WASHINGTON—U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has issued

谢谢！这个我看过，境外走CP的好像没改，但改革之前中介说NVC审结完成就算锁龄，网上看了很多以前中介写的文章也说在缴费审结后成功锁龄什么的，因此不太明白