查看: 2469| 回复: 2
跳转到指定楼层
上一主题 下一主题
收起左侧

[Coursera] Think Again: How to Reason and Argue (Week 10,11,12)

全局:
公开课
学校名称: Duke
Unit号: 4
开课时间: 2014-01-13
课程全名: Think Again: How to Reason and Argue
平台: Coursera

注册一亩三分地论坛,查看更多干货!

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号?注册账号

x
课程汇总 && 介绍:http://www.1point3acres.com/bbs/thread-81227-1-1.html

PART IV: HOW TO MESS UP ARGUMENTS

Week 10 (March 17 - 23): Fallacies of Unclarity
CONTENT: This week’s lectures will define fallacies as common but tempting mistakes in argument. Then we will explore two very common kinds of fallacies that depend on unclarity in language — specifically, slippery slope arguments that depend on vagueness and equivocations that exploit ambiguity. The lectures will close by distinguishing several kinds of definitions that can help to avoid or respond to fallacies of unclarity. READING: Understanding Arguments, Ninth Edition,Chapters 13 and 14

Week 11 (March 24 - 30): Fallacies of Relevance and of Vacuity

CONTENT: This week’s lectures will look at fallacies in which the premises are irrelevant to the conclusion, or in which the premises cannot be reasonably accepted before we have reasonably accepted the conclusion. The first group includes arguments ad hominem and fallacious appeals to authority, to emotion, and to ignorance. The second includes begging the question, but we will also discuss various ways in which people seal their positions to make them immune to any possible counterexample. This apparent virtue turns out to be a vice. READING: Understanding Arguments, Ninth Edition, Chapters 15 and 16

Week 12 (March 31 – April 6): Refutation

CONTENT: Not all objections to arguments succeed in refuting those arguments, so this week’s lectures begin by distinguishing objections from refutations. One way to refute an argument is to show that its premises are false, so we will discuss counterexamples and reductio ad absurdum arguments. Another way to refute an argument is to show that its premises do not support its conclusion, which can be accomplished by a method called refutation by parallel reasoning (or “That’s just like arguing …”). The method is a general way to spot fallacies. This closing week brings us back to a theme of the first week, because refutation is another purpose of argument in addition to persuasion, justification, and explanation. READING: Understanding Arguments, Ninth Edition, Chapter 17

QUIZ #4: At the end of Week 12, students will take their fourth quiz.

上一篇:[Coursera] Think Again: How to Reason and Argue (Week 7,8,9)
下一篇:Berkeley CS 61B Data Structures(in Java) Homework3 加分+讨论帖
🔗
 楼主| zzwcsong 2014-5-12 23:18:45 | 只看该作者
全局:
最后一个做得有点糟糕...有空再做一下= =

Think_again_q4.jpg (181.73 KB, 下载次数: 5)

Think_again_q4.jpg
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
zhan1286 2014-6-1 11:55:02 | 只看该作者
全局:
Quiz 4 done.



回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册账号
隐私提醒:
  • ☑ 禁止发布广告,拉群,贴个人联系方式:找人请去🔗同学同事飞友,拉群请去🔗拉群结伴,广告请去🔗跳蚤市场,和 🔗租房广告|找室友
  • ☑ 论坛内容在发帖 30 分钟内可以编辑,过后则不能删帖。为防止被骚扰甚至人肉,不要公开留微信等联系方式,如有需求请以论坛私信方式发送。
  • ☑ 干货版块可免费使用 🔗超级匿名:面经(美国面经、中国面经、数科面经、PM面经),抖包袱(美国、中国)和录取汇报、定位选校版
  • ☑ 查阅全站 🔗各种匿名方法

本版积分规则

>
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表