注册一亩三分地论坛,查看更多干货!
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号?注册账号 
x
前段时间套了一些教授,我基本都是读了他们的文章(很多是以前做研究就读过的,比较熟),信里面介绍了自己的项目,询问是否招人之类的,并且提供了自己的主页
大约60%都回复了:
一个很match的华裔ap,回复了很多,先讨论了一段学术问题,然后说
Will you apply for graduate school in US this fall or some time in the future? If you have that plan, feel free to send me your materials. As a tradition in our department, graduate students are all taken in as TAs, which means individual faculty cannot make offer decisions. However, if you will apply our department, definitely send me your materials. I will keep an eye on the review process.
-baidu 1point3acres
后面也继续通信了5,6回,感觉人很好。
另一个华裔ap
Thanks for your interest. Your background does fit very well with my research interest. I strongly encourage your to apply. And keep me posted on your application.. From 1point 3acres bbs
一个prof
Thank you for your interest. I will get back to you soon.
这个比较汗。。过了2,3天还没get back给我,我应该再继续发邮件骚扰么?
另一个prof
That's interesting work. Yes, I would like to see your complete data. Funding decisions are not typically made until the winter term (likely in late January or February), but please apply soon and let me know when you do, so I can look at your file.
还有一个就回复了2个字: Please do
-_-
我想问的就是,我的套磁策略对么?有些人说要看些paper提出自己的想法,见解,我觉得这个需要对那个领域十分了解才能提出比较有分量的问题,需要花费大量的时间,特别是自己不是特别熟悉的领域。所以我一般就是summarize一下教授的工作,然后介绍自己的工作,扯点关系这样,是不是还有别的更好的策略?
. 1point3acres.com
另外就是,对于前面几种情况(有的应该算是准“模板”回复吧),接下来我应该如何做呢?更深入了解他们的project探讨,还是就是申请的时候再和他们联系?这些回复一般说明些什么问题呢,有比较positive的么?
多谢! |