新gre的issue有四道题目不是很明白，大家帮忙看一看吧，相互启发。

1，Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, .
题目be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position要求是什么的意思？



2，Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.

Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
这个题目是不是要写出两方面，而不能只写一方的观点，就是说要辩证讨论？

3，Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
这个题目我没有思路啊，不知道大家有没有什么想法相互启发一下。


4，Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.

Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
这道题也要求写两个方面的观点吗？就是辩证讨论，各有利弊的说吗？

第一题是让你举出一两个最能驳倒你观点的论据，让文章显得更全面，有说服力。

回复 2# Theo


    谢谢！因为我是考完托福之后准备gre的，所以还不是很清楚gre的作文和托福的作文思路上的不同，看了一些ets的范文，觉得很晕，自己的思想深度和语言水平根本达不到那个层次。谢谢你的回答！

看看题目，去思考