[预测]S386必然通过

F1A2 发表于 2019-9-20 01:13
很简单，如果真有很强的反对力量，就不会到了这个地步才发声，那些拥抱熊猫派会帮我们忙，不会到达这个地 ...

抛却法案通不通过，我觉得LZ说的很对。整个反对都没组织起来，甚至昨天才知道今天打算UC，虽然奇袭没成功但是这个状态很不对劲。

哈哈哈没通过。 虽然感觉最终大概率还是能过的，毕竟House那边支持率那么高。不知道为什么老在搞unanimous consent，搞投票不是更容易过吗

儒雅的玉羲 发表于 2019-9-20 00:05
The advocates say the bill is going to benefit both Indian AND CHINESE! No one is trying to pass the ...

I misunderstood.

dragonlanding 发表于 2019-9-20 03:24
Hi stupid kid,

Do u remember when u made a statement, u need to prove it? Can you prove it and ...

Is it OK to try to humiliate others in conversation?

dragonlanding 发表于 2019-9-20 03:24
Hi stupid kid,

Do u remember when u made a statement, u need to prove it? Can you prove it and ...

By the way, I am typing in English only because there is no Chinese in this computer.

I capitalized CHINESE only to should how RIDICULOUS the statement is! You are attacking the people on your side! Or are you from Bangalore?!

儒雅的玉羲 发表于 2019-9-20 03:35
By the way, I am typing in English only because there is no Chinese in this computer.

I capita ...

Apologize for it.

儒雅的玉羲 发表于 2019-9-20 03:35
By the way, I am typing in English only because there is no Chinese in this computer.

I capita ...

Oh, I misunderstood ur comment. I'm sorry for that, I think it's better to not put Indian with Chinese toghether. I only want to humiliate those Indian.

Indian is not worth mentioning together with Chinese.

I'm against trash Indian.

Treat my response to those 386 advocator.

My fault

dragonlanding 发表于 2019-9-20 03:39
Who attack you? Why not give the proof of ur statement?

Don't cry on ur lose, try to give a pro ...

I call several senates to say NO today, and now I am explaining my argument.

The advocates say the bill is going to benefit both Indian AND CHINESE!
# I capitalized the letters to show how ridiculous they are because they say it benefits us (Chinese), but it doesn't.

No one is trying to pass the bill in order to hurt Chinese!
# That lou zhu was trying to argue the relationship between China and US will impact the bill, but I think they are trying to make it confused. It is a domestic bill not an international one.
# Here (No one) means the senates or people in political power. I think this is the mis-understanding.
# Again, lou zhu sounds like that the American pass the bill to hurt Chinese, but "hurting chinese" is not the reason, no matter the bill pass or not. The reason behind is Indian trying to DOMINATE greencard.

What you said are TOTALLY UNRELATED!
# That's my point. It is domestic issue not internaional issue.

儒雅的玉羲 发表于 2019-9-20 03:52
I call several senates to say NO today, and now I am explaining my argument.

The advocates say  ...

I apologize, I only want to  humiliate Indian.

dragonlanding 发表于 2019-9-20 03:54
I apologize, I only want to  humiliate Indian.

No problem. Sometimes mis-understanding happens. Take care~