大家可以分享一下自己的学校都是怎么应对的吗

sukiyy 发表于 2020-07-07 14:35:31
我的学校说只有带lab的课才可能in person 问了学院 说是cs虽然有lab 但不是不可替代 因此学院cs还是remote
于是我选了赶紧chemistry chem的lab应该不会在家做吧 但

你是哪个学校？全网课？？

怎么判断自己的学校是否是hybrid？看专业还是看学校开的课程？

某UC 我毕业了 我看到学弟学妹有发朋友圈，说学校发了一封声泪俱下的邮件，用词诚恳 ，说会尽全力保留学生，但是具体方案还没研究出来233

1斤二锅头 发表于 2020-07-07 15:03:53
怎么判断自己的学校是否是hybrid？看专业还是看学校开的课程？

根据ICE的说法，学校要先向SEVIS提交是不是全网课，至于怎么确保学校是hybrid，但某个department或者某个专业的课全是online的，似乎还没有具体的措施

Fluffymoka 发表于 2020-07-07 15:04:10
某UC 我毕业了 我看到学弟学妹有发朋友圈，说学校发了一封声泪俱下的邮件，用词诚恳 ，说会尽全力保留学生，但是具体方案还没研究出来233

我也听说了，似乎加州的UC系统这次有点惨

Dear fellow members of the Columbia community:

I've just announced Columbia’s approach to reopening in the fall. I also want to address a specific group of students, our international students, whose lives have been particularly disrupted by COVID-19—and who are now the subject of a deeply misguided new decision by the U.S. government.

Yesterday, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) provided notice of federal rules that will require international students with F visas to leave the United States if their course of study is entirely online. International students enrolled in hybrid programs providing a mix of in-person and online classes will retain their visas only if they take the minimum number of online classes needed for normal progress in their degree program. Together, these changes mark a devastating reversal of federal policy announced at the onset of the pandemic.

Last week, I pledged to oppose restrictive immigration policies impeding the entry of international faculty, physicians, and research scholars into the U.S. Today, I repeat that pledge. The destructive and indefensible purpose driving these policies is by now all too familiar, as is the resulting damage to the nation’s academic institutions. I will not belabor these points, beyond calling on all of us to remain focused on the ways in which punitive immigration policies severely disrupt and cause enormous harm to the lives of the international students who are part of our Columbia family. With this in mind, there are three important courses of action for us to pursue in the wake of yesterday’s announcement.

First, as the University and each of our deans continue to make decisions about the structure of course offerings for the coming academic year, we must endeavor to configure hybrid classes providing in-person and remote learning options that alleviate the negative effect of these new regulations on Columbia students; we want our international students to be able to complete their studies here, if at all possible. Second, for the large community of international students who cannot come to Columbia because of the pandemic, we will be adapting our network of Columbia Global Centers and creating Pop-Up Global Centers in new locations to provide in-person academic and peer engagement. And, third, as I stated last week, we must continue to vigorously oppose immigration policies that damage Columbia, higher education, the national interest, and the international students, researchers, and faculty who immeasurably enrich our institution and the intellectual and personal experiences of each of us.

We are continuing to consider the implications of yesterday’s announcement and will be providing additional guidance. The International Students & Scholars Office (ISSO) is a wonderful resource for all of our international students—should you have any additional questions or concerns, please reach out to Associate Provost David Austell (david.austell@columbia.edu), or Associate Director Samantha Lu (samantha.lu@columbia.edu).

Sincerely,

Lee C. Bollinger

Dear fellow members of the Columbia community:

I’ve just announced Columbia’s approach to reopening in the fall. I also want to address a specific group of students, our international students, whose lives have been particularly disrupted by COVID-19—and who are now the subject of a deeply misguided new decision by the U.S. government.

Yesterday, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) provided notice of federal rules that will require international students with F visas to leave the United States if their course of study is entirely online. International students enrolled in hybrid programs providing a mix of in-person and online classes will retain their visas only if they take the minimum number of online classes needed for normal progress in their degree program. Together, these changes mark a devastating reversal of federal policy announced at the onset of the pandemic.

Last week, I pledged to oppose restrictive immigration policies impeding the entry of international faculty, physicians, and research scholars into the U.S. Today, I repeat that pledge. The destructive and indefensible purpose driving these policies is by now all too familiar, as is the resulting damage to the nation’s academic institutions. I will not belabor these points, beyond calling on all of us to remain focused on the ways in which punitive immigration policies severely disrupt and cause enormous harm to the lives of the international students who are part of our Columbia family. With this in mind, there are three important courses of action for us to pursue in the wake of yesterday’s announcement.

First, as the University and each of our deans continue to make decisions about the structure of course offerings for the coming academic year, we must endeavor to configure hybrid classes providing in-person and remote learning options that alleviate the negative effect of these new regulations on Columbia students; we want our international students to be able to complete their studies here, if at all possible. Second, for the large community of international students who cannot come to Columbia because of the pandemic, we will be adapting our network of Columbia Global Centers and creating Pop-Up Global Centers in new locations to provide in-person academic and peer engagement. And, third, as I stated last week, we must continue to vigorously oppose immigration policies that damage Columbia, higher education, the national interest, and the international students, researchers, and faculty who immeasurably enrich our institution and the intellectual and personal experiences of each of us.

We are continuing to consider the implications of yesterday’s announcement and will be providing additional guidance.

lbytenwater 发表于 2020-07-07 15:06:32
根据ICE的说法，学校要先向SEVIS提交是不是全网课，至于怎么确保学校是hybrid，但某个department或者某个专业的课全是online的，似乎还没有具体的措施

我们iso说 过几天ice会做一个QA给他们 他们会问一些问题 现在对于hybrid其实notice上面说的并不明确。

sukiyy 发表于 2020-07-07 15:10:51
我们iso说 过几天ice会做一个QA给他们 他们会问一些问题 现在对于hybrid其实notice上面说的并不明确。

那就好....不过我觉得这个QA未必会是正面的，如果说的不清楚，可能会有操作空间，说得太清楚 操作空间就没了

lbytenwater 发表于 2020-07-07 15:06:32
根据ICE的说法，学校要先向SEVIS提交是不是全网课，至于怎么确保学校是hybrid，但某个department或者某个专业的课全是online的，似乎还没有具体的措施

好的呢 感谢你的回答 我再问问看