H1B新规进展：美国劳工部在DC被起诉，国土安全部在加州被起诉！

jjmonkey23 发表于 2020-12-01 15:45:51
请见下图
Today's ruling blocks the two new regulations entirely, as if they were never put into place (a

This is awesome! Thanks for sharing!

大家Facebook Live见哦！撒花💐🍀🍾😘

补充内容 (2020-12-2 08:07):
贴一下结论给大家 （https://doc-0s-58-docs.googleuse...o3c4c7j2cmtnoqege7v）

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 pandemic has wreaked havoc on the nation’s health, and millions of Americans have been impacted financially by restrictions imposed on businesses, large and small, during the pandemic; the consequences of those restrictions has been a fiscal calamity for many individuals. However, “[t]he history of the United States is in part made of the stories, talents, and lasting contributions of those who crossed oceans and deserts to come here. The National Government has significant power to regulate immigration. With power comes responsibility, and the sound exercise of national power over immigration depends on the Nation’s meeting its responsibility to base its laws on a political will informed by searching, thoughtful, rational civic discourse.” Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387, 416 (2012).
For the reasons set forth above, Defendants failed to show there was good cause to dispense with the rational and thoughtful discourse that is provided by the APA’s notice and comment requirements. Accordingly, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs are entitled to judgment in their favor on their first two claims for relief, and the Court sets aside the Rules on the basis that they were promulgated in violation of 5 U.S.C. section 553(b). The Court finds no just reason for delay, and it shall enter a partial judgment on those claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 1, 2020
______________________________________
JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge

請問一下，這個決議是適用於全美，還是僅有提出訴訟的州？

很开心，大家等了这么久
这个block是永久的吗?不会过段时间又被推翻吧？

那已经出薪水的 该怎么办？重新提交吗？

清风疏桐 发表于 2020-12-2 08:33
很开心，大家等了这么久
这个block是永久的吗?不会过段时间又被推翻吧？

马上拜登上台DOL和DHS都要换人了，想appeal也没有时间了吧

CarrotCesca 发表于 2020-12-2 08:47
马上拜登上台DOL和DHS都要换人了，想appeal也没有时间了吧

大赞 哈哈

太好了！最近每天刷更新

今天大家有没有听Greg的Facebook直播呢？看到好多华人名字在上面点赞留言。今天打扒新规的原告律师Paul Hughes也参加了直播。三个律师讲这个案子都快要笑岔气了。Paul说，DOL和DHS的辩护逻辑是说，因为全美新冠疫情非常严峻，所以他们必须得跨过正常公众六十天的评论期，直接发布新规，不然全美将受到重创（我总结的简单粗暴一点）。还举例说上一次跨过正常评论期的新规，是因为911，然后限制直升机飞，说那才说的过去。正是这个原因，就算政府再来appeal，那就随他们吧，反正这逻辑怎么都是讲不通的。反观这么一个情况，就理解为啥Greg他们有阵子没谈这个案子，那么心安的说这个肯定很快的啦。他们还强调说，这次法官不是只给了preliminary injuction而是直接final rule，等于一案叫停，全国受益。🤪

补充内容 (2020-12-2 21:39):
更正一下，“直升机飞”应该是“飞机飞行安全”，因为生死相关，政府才得以赶紧跨过六十天直接颁布规则。不然都是违反APA程序法的。

MrF 发表于 2020-12-1 11:56
什么叫对法律程序没有了解？说实话在Greg 一开始说hearing明天开始的时候，您对法律了解的深入，您知道有 ...

光速打脸