12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: lqbz220
跳转到指定楼层
上一主题 下一主题
收起左侧

[Family-Based] 湾区婚绿timeline+I-944材料

🔗
lulud 2020-11-9 06:15:50 | 只看该作者
全局:
chopinh0629 发表于 2020-11-8 01:25
婚绿组织,有兴趣email我,地里id的gmail.com。

我也想加入!
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
chopinh0629 2020-11-9 12:58:05 | 只看该作者
全局:

所以不是说了嘛,给我发邮件啊😂
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
abby04 2020-11-14 17:01:50 | 只看该作者
全局:
lqbz220 发表于 2020-11-3 14:12
什么?你在哪里看到的?

发不了链接,摘一段新闻,感兴趣的可以跟进这个case number: Cook County, Illinois, et al v. Wolf et. al., (19-cv-6334)

"The November 2, 2020 ruling in the district court in Cook County, Illinois, et al v. Wolf et. al., (19-cv-6334), granted summary judgment in favor of Plaintiffs on their claim that DHS’s Public Charge Rule, 84 Fed. Reg. 41,292 (Aug. 14, 2019) violates the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 701 et. seq. The district court specifically ruled that:

the public charge exceeds DHS’s authority under the public charge provision of the INA, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(4)(A);
is not in accordance with law; and
is arbitrary and capricious.

Therefore, the court immediately set aside the DHS Public Charge Rule nationwide without staying its decision pending appeal. However, on November 3, 2020, the Seventh Circuit issued an administrative stay, effective immediately. This ruling dictates that all adjustment of status (Form I-485) green card filings must be filed with Form I-944 once again.
"
所以就是district court 11/02说不用了,然后巡回法院11/03说...还是继续要...转了一圈又回来了...
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
gnuliutingting 2020-11-15 00:16:58 | 只看该作者
全局:
太折腾人了,

这里有链接 https://www.uscis.gov/green-card ... nal-rule-litigation


History of Court Decisions
On Nov. 3, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued an administrative stay of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois’ Nov. 2, 2020, decision that vacated the DHS Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds Final Rule. This administrative stay allows DHS to resume implementing the Public Charge Final Rule nationwide. As of Nov. 4, 2020, USCIS will adjudicate applications and petitions postmarked (or electronically submitted, if applicable) on or after Feb. 24, 2020, under the Public Charge Final Rule.

On Nov. 2, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois found the Public Charge Final Rule procedurally and substantively invalid under the Administrative Procedure Act and vacated the Public Charge Final Rule nationwide effective Nov. 2, 2020, and USCIS immediately stopped applying the Public Charge Final Rule to all applications and petitions that would have been subject to it. Instead, USCIS applied the 1999 public charge guidance that was in place before the Public Charge Final Rule was implemented on Feb. 24, 2020, to the adjudication of any application for adjustment of status that was pending or received Nov. 2-3, 2020. In addition, on Nov. 2-3, 2020, USCIS adjudicated any application or petition for extension of nonimmigrant stay or change of nonimmigrant status pending or received on Nov. 2 or Nov. 3, 2020, consistent with regulations in place before the Public Charge Rule was implemented; in other words, the public benefit condition was not applied.

On Sept. 11, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in State of New York, et al. v. DHS, et al. and Make the Road NY et al. v. Cuccinelli, granted a full stay of the July 29, 2020, injunction pending the government’s appeal. This full stay allows DHS to resume implementing the Public Charge Final Rule nationwide, including in New York, Connecticut and Vermont. USCIS did not re-adjudicate any applications and petitions that were approved following the issuance of the July 29, 2020, injunction continuing until Sept. 22, 2020.

On Aug. 12, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in State of New York, et al. v. DHS, et al. and Make the Road NY et al. v. Cuccinelli, granted a temporary stay of the July 29, 2020, nationwide injunction in all states outside of the Second Circuit (that is, all states except New York, Connecticut and Vermont).

On July 30, 2020, we announced that we would apply the 1999 public charge guidance when adjudicating any application for adjustment of status on or after July 29, 2020, and while the injunction was in place. We also announced that we would use the regulations that were in place before the Public Charge Final Rule was implemented on Feb. 24, 2020, to adjudicate applications and petitions for extension of nonimmigrant stay and change of nonimmigrant status (that is, we would not apply the public benefit condition while the injunction remained in place).

On July 29, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), in State of New York, et al. v. DHS, et al. and Make the Road NY et al. v. Cuccinelli, et al., enjoined DHS from enforcing, applying, implementing, or treating as effective the Public Charge Final Rule during a declared national health emergency. The decision was issued during the COVID-19 outbreak. (84 FR 41292, Aug. 14, 2019, final rule; as amended by 84 FR 52357, Oct. 2, 2019, final rule correction.)

回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册账号
隐私提醒:
  • ☑ 禁止发布广告,拉群,贴个人联系方式:找人请去🔗同学同事飞友,拉群请去🔗拉群结伴,广告请去🔗跳蚤市场,和 🔗租房广告|找室友
  • ☑ 论坛内容在发帖 30 分钟内可以编辑,过后则不能删帖。为防止被骚扰甚至人肉,不要公开留微信等联系方式,如有需求请以论坛私信方式发送。
  • ☑ 干货版块可免费使用 🔗超级匿名:面经(美国面经、中国面经、数科面经、PM面经),抖包袱(美国、中国)和录取汇报、定位选校版
  • ☑ 查阅全站 🔗各种匿名方法

本版积分规则

>
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表