OPT延长至24个月政策急需你的支持评论 否则很可能失败！！！

1jz-8m69-rvft
又去发了一贴。

Comment tracking number: 1jz-8m69-vdjt

.google  иI STRONGLY SUPPORT the idea of STEM extension is truly a good idea for the stable growth of large companies. It can give large companies recruit hardworking international engineering students for the positions which the number of domestic engineering students is not enough for.

I welcome this amendment to extend the OPT period for STEM graduates. Its great to see DHS taking this initiative that would help many American companies to have continued service from top class graduates from around the world. Recently I have seen many forums who spoke against foreign workers and asking for local jobs. They are not understanding the basic fact that for an American company to be the best in the world, they need the best talent in the world which eventually boosts the American economy itself.This amendment will have a long term impact on US Tech industry, with all these companies able to keep their competitive edge.

Its good for the students who have chosen US universities to get their Master degree, to achieve more exposure in US companies. US companies are known for having the most diverse resource pool which gives a unique opportunity for these students to work with top talents. With global universities competing to upgrade their status, these measures will provide a continued advantage to US Universities which have been a magnet for top students from all around the world.

试着写了一条，我再理理思路
1jz-8m4t-snig

Comment Tracking Number: 1jz-8m69-3s5n 第二发

1jz-8m69-rz7n 结合了一下前辈们的观点

1jz-8m69-czbc又发了一条

1jz-8m69-b09s

支持同胞, 赞赞rp, 求回国签证水果

<br><br><br>I support the<br>proposal after careful reading of the document. I think this is a well balanced<br>document. STEM OPT extension helps U. S economy, the U.S higher education and<br>the technology sector. The oversight measures as proposed ensure protection for<br>American workers in similar situations as well as international trainees.<br><br><br><br>This proposal<br>helps U.S economy in several aspects.<br><br><br><br>1. It helps to<br>attract international students to study in the U.S thereby bringing in billions<br>of dollars. According to NAFSA stats, in 2013-2014 alone, foreign students<br>contributed $26.8 billion. International students pay almost double the tuition<br>that non resident U.S students pay. I know that because my child is currently<br>studying in the U.S. International students come to the U.S not only for the<br>educational and cultural experiences in general, they come to learn how to<br>apply what is taught to solve real world problems. OPT provides an excellent<br>opportunity for that purpose. Considering the complexities of STEM subjects, 36<br>months’ of OPT sounds reasonable. Other industrialized countries such as U.K,<br>Australia, Canada and even emerging countries like China, are providing such<br>opportunity in order to attract talented students.<br><br><br><br>Secondly,<br>sufficient amount of OPT will help students improve their practical skills and<br>also improve their competitiveness in their home country’s job market. It will<br>also give them an insight into American culture at the work place thereby<br>enabling them to act as a bridge between their home country and their U.S<br>employers. This will help U.S companies expand into their home country markets<br>in the long run as most international students will return to their home<br>country.<br><br><br><br>Thirdly, a small<br>number of international students will be hired by U.S companies which is also<br>beneficial for the American economy. They will contribute to the STEM work<br>force diversity and more importantly talented people who are critical for the<br>technology based U.S economy.<br><br><br><br>This proposal also<br>protects U.S workers. Section V(G) requires U.S institutions to give equal<br>protection to international trainees and similarly situated U.S workers in terms<br>of duties, hours and COMPENSATION and further stipulates that U.S employers can<br>not lay off or furlough U.S workers as a result of taking on trainees. This is<br>sufficient protection for U.S workers. Therefore, the proposal creates a win<br>win situation for all stake holders.<br><br><br><br>Finally, I think<br>Section V(F) need to be reconsidered as the fact students who abandoned their<br>STEM field to study in another non-STEM field should not be in the STEM OPT<br>program.  <br><br><br><br> <br><br><br>

打算每天3发 质量议论文 让美帝见识天朝水军的厉害！
忘记copy comment 回忆几个点
1. 美帝学习 1年实践太短
2. 公司渴望人才 身份无关
3. 国际生工作更加刻苦

Your Comment Tracking Number: 1jz-8m6a-acnj

The IT industry needs STEM students who are smart and hard-working, and most of all, who best fit the job requirements.
The STEM students work hard because their families are paying a large load of money to American education institutions and IRS and Medicare center and landlords and other organizations to let them have a great learning experience in USA, and to gain great working abilities. It's not fair to say that STEM students are taking American's jobs. It's just a competitive environment and sometimes people who work like 100 hrs a week can get hired and paid.
And we STEM students will continue to study and work hard, to try to earn back every penny that our parents save up for half of their lives. We are capable and we deserve a fair chance to get more OPT. America is a country who don't judge people, and we shouldn't be judged based on our nationality.
What's more, job market doesn't have a constant size. The number of jobs in job market is changing all the time. When the industry era begun, workers replaced farmers. After WWII, women entered the working environment, first they were secretaries, and then some of them became important people.
With more useful people developing the STEM industry, and they industry will become larger and more advanced, there will be more jobs open to everyone, native or foreigners.
Just, let us compete in a fair environment, we are good to America. We are the people who make differences.