OPT延长至24个月政策急需你的支持评论 否则很可能失败！！！

强烈建议那些申请留学的孩子也来写啊！这个不仅影响我们这些在美国的人，对千千万万的后来者的影响力才最大啊！

评论过了，还没显示出来，1jz-8m55-eyok

大家多提供思路，方便后人写评论，直接在这个基础上改改也可以。还有，大家要把观点清楚地表达在第一句话。有些评论写的太绕，根本让人看不出态度。
评论页面
Template:Opening:
(1) YES! I DO SUPPORT the opt-extension. (2) I believe OPT-extension if NECESSARY for our country. (3) YES, OPT-extension would be in the best interest of our nation.

Firstly, xxx. In addition, xxx. What's more, xxx. 自己加个总结。

我的论点1：
Over the years, foreign tech workers contributed tramendous growth to the USA economy. If USA lose this force, USA loses a large portion of growth that the foreign workers bring about. Without policies like OPT-extension, it would just be a matter of time before USA becomes another mundane country where miracles no longer happen. Without the embraciveness of foreign workers, I can forsee someday very soon when USA economy stagnates, people lose jobs, and social problems arises. DON'T LET THAT HAPPEN. APPROVE the OPT-extension.

2:
The request to place the right of citizens over non-citizens is simply RIDICULOUS. Just remember, every citizen or their ancester once was an immigrant.

3:
As someone experienced in the tech industry, I can tell you with my reputation that the tech companies can never hire enough talents these days. Go ask the hiring managers and recruiters, they will tell you the same. Yes, USA probably has a lot of STEM people, but it simply does not have enough STEM talents. See, there is a distinction between normal people and talents. USA needs the talents from foreign workers to keep its machiens running well, and running better than the rest of the world.

晕，找了两次都找不到评论的地方，英语不好，算了。

我能想到的论点：
1.国际学生给美国带来了巨大贡献。国际学生提高而不是降低了工资水平，让他们创业带来更多的就业机会，帮助美国寻找下一个增长点，而且交了很多税。
2.国际学生和最低工资基本上毫无关系，也不该让他们为软件及互联网行业工资增长停滞的现象负责。真正造成停滞的是工作外包和行业进步减速。前者正是因为我们拒绝外国学生留下，公司倾向于找成本更低的没有美国留学经验的外国程序员。后者则是因为创新动力减少，这也是外国留学生纷纷回国造成的，因为我们培养的拥有创新能力的人才都被我们自己赶走了！
3.赶走国际学生会带来暂时的relief，但长期不仅不利于美国的战略利益，而且不利于美国老百姓的切身利益。如果他们都回去了，美国工作会外流到国外更便宜的地区，美国创新能力会枯竭。可以列举这两年中国互联网日新月异的变化，几乎所有的创业者都有美国留学经验，这说明美国正在驱赶自己的创新者、job creator。

linjunch 发表于 2015-11-9 01:31
晕，找了两次都找不到评论的地方，英语不好，算了。

屏幕最上端，submit formal comment

已评论，不过感觉三哥三姐在这事上应该更积极啊

之前觉得正面评价不少，最近就没有写，看来要开始每天一刷了

尽人事听天命

写了三条驳斥negative comment 的 理由：
I want to dispute those arguments of negative comments:
Foreign Students take away jobs and do not pay tax: foreign students working on OPT PAY TAX and they help local economies. Without foreign students, US universities and research institutions will face huge loss.Those property renting, food service and other industries will face huge loss

Why not invest in US students more instead of recruiting foreign students: there is no guarantee how long it will take and how much it will cost to train all US students  to fully compensate loss of foreign students

There is no shortage of US students in STEM: Quantity does not mean quality. There are also a huge number of foreign students in STEM but only a very small proportion of them can pass the strict interviews and finally get a job by US companies

国际学生过来大把大把地交着学费，本来就是对美国经济的巨大贡献，如果废止OPT势必会打击国际学生的积极性，对美国经济必然产生很大的不良影响