📣 独立日限时特惠: VIP通行证立减$68
楼主: 老油条
跳转到指定楼层
上一主题 下一主题
收起左侧

反对HR1044可以发邮件也可以上twitter灌水

 
🔗
 楼主| 老油条 2019-7-11 05:05:17 | 只看该作者
全局:
噩耗,众议院刚刚以压倒性的票数通过了HR1044,365 v 60+。鉴于印度人已经收买了大量共和党议员,不要以为senate肯定会挡下这个bill,形势非常危急,请马上行动,不要等一觉醒来发现排期变十年了再后悔!

关于给议员写信是否违法:已经向多名律师求证,宪法第一修正案保护所有resident的petition to government权利,写信给议员完全合法,不必担心。
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
丘比神剑 2019-7-11 05:09:44 | 只看该作者
全局:
老油条 发表于 2019-7-11 05:05
噩耗,众议院刚刚以压倒性的票数通过了HR1044,365 v 60+。鉴于印度人已经收买了大量共和党议员,不要以为s ...

楼主有心了,的确很危机了!大家都应该快点行动起来。
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
lihaiba2333 2019-7-11 05:21:03 | 只看该作者
全局:
上哪里找议员们的邮箱?Google吗?
回复

使用道具 举报

全局:
spicemonkey 发表于 2019/07/11 02:26:04
之前发了很多邮件,收到了很多没用的auto-replies
今天收到一个算是比较“正式”的回复,来自 Tim Kaine 但是也完全没看懂这个senator到底支持还是反对,在这里贴一下

Th...

估计就是会投反对票 都说put American first, support diversity了。
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
大清新666 2019-7-11 09:54:34 | 只看该作者
全局:


已疯狂灌水,略尽绵薄之力
回复

使用道具 举报

地里匿名用户
🔗
匿名用户-NGSBV  2019-7-11 10:25:57
老油条 发表于 2019-7-10 23:53
I am female. Keep it up folks!! NoHR044 tag下面已经有很多本土公众号和个人在刷了,这次除了印度人, ...

对的,所以还是很有希望把这个法案打回去的。
回复

使用道具 举报

地里匿名用户
🔗
匿名用户-NGSBV  2019-7-11 10:27:10
spicemonkey 发表于 2019-7-11 02:26
之前发了很多邮件,收到了很多没用的auto-replies
今天收到一个算是比较“正式”的回复,来自 Tim Kaine  ...

这个应该是反对的!太好了,可以确定tim kaine不赞成hr1044/s386
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
QueenieV 2019-7-11 10:42:07 | 只看该作者
全局:
感谢楼主,行动起来!
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
keanezheng 2019-7-11 13:25:27 | 只看该作者
全局:
文科生转码,贡献一个自己写的personalized版本的回复,欢迎拷贝并发送或者twitter po给自己所在州的senator,注意更改地理位置


Dear Senator Cantwell,

“Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act of 2019” or HR1044 is one of the most unfair and dangerous proposals regarding immigration. This legislation intends to remove per-country cap on Green Cards issued every year, benefits only citizens from one country and allows them to flood the entire employment-based Green Card system. The bill will enable that country's citizens to gain exclusive access to employment-based Green Cards over the next few years because there are so many pending applications from them. The current per-country cap on employment-based Green Cards ensures that citizens from every country in the world will have a chance to gain permanent residency in the United States by having a professional job, paying taxes and contributing to the diversity of this nation. The current system is nowhere near perfect, but it is definitely fairer than what HR1044 tries to do. It is almost ironic that this House bill advertises itself as a reform to make the current Green Card system 'fair’, but in fact it is unfair to Green Card applicants from most countries.

Unfortunately, the House passed this dangerous and unfair bill today, so now it is the Senate’s turn to decide whether America wants a legal immigration system that embraces diversity and is fair to people from all over the world, or leave the door open to immigrants from just one country. As a foreign resident who works and lives in the Seattle area, I am deeply concerned about the implication and long-term consequences of this bill should it becomes law of the land. The bill will effectively cut off employment-based immigration from other countries due to how it addresses the backlog of pending applications. Do we want a consistent flow of professional immigrants from just one country years after years? Is this the way America should welcome settlers from the rest of the world? Does this benefit the workforce of this country? Does this promote or inhibit cultural diversity of our society?

These are the questions I hope our legislators should think about before casting their votes. I sincerely request Senator Cantwell to consider voting 'No' on the Senate version of this bill S386. Again, S386 does not ensure fairness under the current immigration system because there is a cap on numbers of Green Cards issued each year, but effectively removes the diversity of immigrants coming to this country. If this bill passes, there will only be citizens from one country who are able to receive Green cards over the next decade. This is not how American immigration system should work. Please reconsider S386 from the perspective of Green Card applicants from other countries if you intend to vote 'Yes'.

Thank you and looking forward to your reply!

Yours sincerely,

XXX

评分

参与人数 1大米 +3 收起 理由
老油条 + 3 非常赞

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
wenting33 2019-7-11 13:58:41 | 只看该作者
全局:
spicemonkey 发表于 2019-7-11 02:26
之前发了很多邮件,收到了很多没用的auto-replies
今天收到一个算是比较“正式”的回复,来自 Tim Kaine  ...

要是他是副总统多好啊,丧心

补充内容 (2019-7-11 14:18):
另外除了灌水也尽量retweet支持的观点,传播开来
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册账号
隐私提醒:
  • ☑ 禁止发布广告,拉群,贴个人联系方式:找人请去🔗同学同事飞友,拉群请去🔗拉群结伴,广告请去🔗跳蚤市场,和 🔗租房广告|找室友
  • ☑ 论坛内容在发帖 30 分钟内可以编辑,过后则不能删帖。为防止被骚扰甚至人肉,不要公开留微信等联系方式,如有需求请以论坛私信方式发送。
  • ☑ 干货版块可免费使用 🔗超级匿名:面经(美国面经、中国面经、数科面经、PM面经),抖包袱(美国、中国)和录取汇报、定位选校版
  • ☑ 查阅全站 🔗各种匿名方法

本版积分规则

>
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表