[反HR1044]这下排期要10年了吧

rk_jh 发表于 2019-7-11 09:35
It's good for EB5 China. There won't be backlogs if this thing passes

听说排期会从15年变成8,9年，感觉也没那么夸张

Sanshou 发表于 2019-7-11 09:45
听说排期会从15年变成8,9年，感觉也没那么夸张

那是EB2，过了缓冲三年排期会变长

EB5的话排期会消失

希望大家都能去发邮件去twitter上呼吁，而不是寄希望于参议院挡下来。事关自己的利益，你不去发声，就不会有人为你发声。当然我同意所有人的利益并不统一，EB5可能高兴疯了，不过这个论坛可能还是eb2/3比较多。

uuisafresh 发表于 2019-7-11 08:44
请问一下，排期过程不是无限等待？为什么有些人说要回国了？

排期增加了十年意思就是这十年都要有h1b, 然而h1b抽不抽的中是一个问题，h1b每年还要续签，续签会不会check也是一个问题...10+年胆战心惊的生活 不如早日回国占坑了？

eason0218 发表于 2019-7-11 10:20
排期增加了十年意思就是这十年都要有h1b, 然而h1b抽不抽的中是一个问题，h1b每年还要续签，续签会不会che ...

要是有EAD也就罢了还可以在旁边赚点小钱。非移民身份拖的越久不小心喝了个酒撞车导致压根没法转正的机会也增加啊。

obama555 发表于 2019-7-11 07:22
不要太紧张，没那么夸张，根据新法案，烙印在3年缓冲期过后一年可以拿EB2+3总共8万名额，现在他们总共排期 ...

按照现在排期中国人也就2-3年拿卡。烙印有本事让移民局增单批名额给他们啊，凭啥抢别人的。不能让他们得逞。

文科生转码，贡献一个自己写的personalized版本的回复，欢迎拷贝并发送或者twitter po给自己所在州的senator，注意更改地理位置


Dear Senator Cantwell,

“Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act of 2019” or HR1044 is one of the most unfair and dangerous proposals regarding immigration. This legislation intends to remove per-country cap on Green Cards issued every year, benefits only citizens from one country and allows them to flood the entire employment-based Green Card system. The bill will enable that country's citizens to gain exclusive access to employment-based Green Cards over the next few years because there are so many pending applications from them. The current per-country cap on employment-based Green Cards ensures that citizens from every country in the world will have a chance to gain permanent residency in the United States by having a professional job, paying taxes and contributing to the diversity of this nation. The current system is nowhere near perfect, but it is definitely fairer than what HR1044 tries to do. It is almost ironic that this House bill advertises itself as a reform to make the current Green Card system 'fair’, but in fact it is unfair to Green Card applicants from most countries.

Unfortunately, the House passed this dangerous and unfair bill today, so now it is the Senate’s turn to decide whether America wants a legal immigration system that embraces diversity and is fair to people from all over the world, or leave the door open to immigrants from just one country. As a foreign resident who works and lives in the Seattle area, I am deeply concerned about the implication and long-term consequences of this bill should it becomes law of the land. The bill will effectively cut off employment-based immigration from other countries due to how it addresses the backlog of pending applications. Do we want a consistent flow of professional immigrants from just one country years after years? Is this the way America should welcome settlers from the rest of the world? Does this benefit the workforce of this country? Does this promote or inhibit cultural diversity of our society?

These are the questions I hope our legislators should think about before casting their votes. I sincerely request Senator Cantwell to consider voting 'No' on the Senate version of this bill S386. Again, S386 does not ensure fairness under the current immigration system because there is a cap on numbers of Green Cards issued each year, but effectively removes the diversity of immigrants coming to this country. If this bill passes, there will only be citizens from one country who are able to receive Green cards over the next decade. This is not how American immigration system should work. Please reconsider S386 from the perspective of Green Card applicants from other countries if you intend to vote 'Yes'.

Thank you and looking forward to your reply!

Yours sincerely,

XXX

反对的请愿链接： https://petitions.whitehouse.gov ... nd-racial-diversity

能不能出个英文版的文章，这样大家可以转发到twitter。 或者允许我们自己翻译

Sanshou 发表于 2019-7-10 17:27
这个对EB5有什么样的影响呢

加快排期。EB5中国人站绝大多数。