Senate 直播 9/24

JinnyHui 发表于 2019-9-25 06:31
这。。。你是我们的地下小同志吗？

哈哈哈哈！太可爱了吧~

echoshishido 发表于 2019-9-25 02:26
哦哦，那我赶紧回去继续看。。。烙印的聊天群里出奇的安静，我以为今天不搞了。

哈哈，说不定是发现你藏在里面，新开了个群

painlet2 发表于 2019-9-24 08:56
https://twitter.com/The_Americat/status/1176515422964846592?s=20
#SenGrassley at 10:02am Gave openi ...

原文：
WE'VE BEEN HEARING FROM THE OTHER BODY A LOT ABOUT HOW THE SENATE ISN'T TAKING UP HOUSE BILLS. NOW, THAT SEEMS TO BE AS THOUGH THE SENATE IS SUPPOSED TO SOMEHOW BE A RUBBER-STAMP FOR THE OTHER BODY. WELL, WE JUST CELEBRATED CONSTITUTION DAY LAST WEEK, AND THE CONSTITUTION DOESN'T PROVIDE FOR THE SENATE TO AUTOMATICALLY TAKE UP BILLS FROM THE OTHER BODY. MAYBE IT'S TIME FOR A REMINDER ABOUT HOW THE FOUNDING FATHERS INTENDED THE SENATE TO WORK. SO I'M GOING TO GIVE A SHORT QUOTE BY JAMES MADISON IN FEDERALIST PAPER 62 ENTITLED THE SENATE. QUOTE, THE NECESSITY OF A SENATE IS NOT LESS INDICATED BY THE PROPENSITY OF ALL SINGLE AND NUMEROUS ASSEMBLIES TO YIELD TO THE IMPULSE OF SUDDEN AND VIOLENT PATIONZ AND TO BE -- PASSIONS AND TO BE SEDUCED BY PASS -- FASTIST LEADERS. I'M NOT SAYING -- END OF QUOTE. I'M NOT SAYING THAT THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES PASSES INTEMPERAMENT BETTER RESOLUTIONS, BUT OUR FOUNDING FATHERS THOUGHT THAT COULD HAPPEN AND THEY HAD THE SENATE TO BE A CHECK ON THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, JUST LIKE THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CAN BE A CHECK ON ANYTHING THAT WE DO. SO THERE ARE NOW OVER 80 BILLS THAT HAVE PASSED BOTH HOUSES, BUT THERE'S SOME THAT CAN'T PASS THE SENATE AND THERE'S PROBABLY SOME THAT THE SENATE FEELS SHOULDN'T EVEN BE BROUGHT UP. BUT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE HOUSE AND SENATE AND SOME CONTEMPLATION BY THE SENATE TO BE VERY CAUTIOUS, THAT'S HOW THE CONSTITUTION MEANT SENATE WAS SUPPOSED TO WORK, AND I HOPE LEADERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES WILL BE REMINDED OF THAT FROM TIME TO TIME, AND THAT'S MY PURPOSE TODAY. I YIELD THE FLOOR. I SUGGEST THE ABSENCE OF A QUORUM.

从blind上看到的，不知道地里贴过没有，看来这个难过grassley这一关

HenryZhuRAEX 发表于 2019/09/25 01:51:52
结合之前周末twitter上展示的他给某位居民的回复邮件，Grassley的态度已经很明确了。我猜测他和一大部分议员一样，刚开始并不清楚H1-b和绿卡之类的政策，被法案的摘要忽悠了。简单了解一下法案...

请问有回复邮件的链接吗？

azsrz 发表于 2019/09/25 08:32:06
从blind上看到的，不知道地里贴过没有，看来这个难过grassley这一关

大家要知道投票投nay和UC站出来object有很大区别，目前没有议员表示愿意出来挡住

补充内容 (2019-9-25 01:23):
真投了估计就过了

饮风醉月 发表于 2019-9-25 09:23
大家要知道投票投nay和UC站出来object有很大区别，目前没有议员表示愿意出来挡住

补充内容 (2019-9-25 01 ...

这正是我所担心的，如果他要UC move into consideration比要UC pass the bill还可怕，因为前者更不容易招反对

Asianmale 发表于 2019/09/25 09:27:55
这正是我所担心的，如果他要UC move into consideration比要UC pass the bill还可怕，因为签证更不容易招反对

什么意思啊？要过了？

shenmeqingkuang 发表于 2019/09/25 09:45:29
什么意思啊？要过了？

我觉得议员的邮件大家收到发出来很好，但是要知道其含义。最多只是代表有可能投nay，离站出来object差的远了。

所以一些帖子的标题有些误导，让大家觉得好像没事了，然后又不打电话了，要知道IV的印度群人家阿三天天在打！

再次强调，议员永远是为了利益出发，没好处不会站出来挡的，会得罪很多人，所以我们电话不要停！！只有舆论压力够了，他们才会站出来object！

补充内容 (2019-9-25 02:10):
请把这个讯息扩散一下，好像不少人误解了

饮风醉月 发表于 2019-9-25 10:10
我觉得议员的邮件大家收到发出来很好，但是要知道其含义。最多只是代表有可能投nay，离站出来object差的远 ...

对 说实话我现在真不知道哪个议员真的愿意站出来反对