Senate 直播 9/24

painlet2 发表于 2019-9-25 00:56
https://twitter.com/The_Americat/status/1176515422964846592?s=20
#SenGrassley at 10:02am Gave openi ...

这话他是在针对谁呢……

painlet2 发表于 2019-9-25 00:56
https://twitter.com/The_Americat/status/1176515422964846592?s=20
#SenGrassley at 10:02am Gave openi ...

格老震慑一下有点用，希望Lee别再出来UC了，美国人都在骂他是叛徒

有消息了吗？UC了没？

森林火柴 发表于 2019-9-25 01:17
格老还说你们这些众议员的蠢货以后得记住。。。

是的， 全文：
WE'VE BEEN HEARING FROM THE OTHER BODY A LOT ABOUT HOW THE SENATE ISN'T TAKING UP HOUSE BILLS. NOW, THAT SEEMS TO BE AS THOUGH THE SENATE IS SUPPOSED TO SOMEHOW BE A RUBBER-STAMP FOR THE OTHER BODY. WELL, WE JUST CELEBRATED CONSTITUTION DAY LAST WEEK, AND THE CONSTITUTION DOESN'T PROVIDE FOR THE SENATE TO AUTOMATICALLY TAKE UP BILLS FROM THE OTHER BODY. MAYBE IT'S TIME FOR A REMINDER ABOUT HOW THE FOUNDING FATHERS INTENDED THE SENATE TO WORK. SO I'M GOING TO GIVE A SHORT QUOTE BY JAMES MADISON IN FEDERALIST PAPER 62 ENTITLED THE SENATE. QUOTE, THE NECESSITY OF A SENATE IS NOT LESS INDICATED BY THE PROPENSITY OF ALL SINGLE AND NUMEROUS ASSEMBLIES TO YIELD TO THE IMPULSE OF SUDDEN AND VIOLENT PATIONZ AND TO BE -- PASSIONS AND TO BE SEDUCED BY PASS -- FASTIST LEADERS. I'M NOT SAYING -- END OF QUOTE. I'M NOT SAYING THAT THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES PASSES INTEMPERAMENT BETTER RESOLUTIONS, BUT OUR FOUNDING FATHERS THOUGHT THAT COULD HAPPEN AND THEY HAD THE SENATE TO BE A CHECK ON THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, JUST LIKE THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CAN BE A CHECK ON ANYTHING THAT WE DO. SO THERE ARE NOW OVER 80 BILLS THAT HAVE PASSED BOTH HOUSES, BUT THERE'S SOME THAT CAN'T PASS THE SENATE AND THERE'S PROBABLY SOME THAT THE SENATE FEELS SHOULDN'T EVEN BE BROUGHT UP. BUT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE HOUSE AND SENATE AND SOME CONTEMPLATION BY THE SENATE TO BE VERY CAUTIOUS, THAT'S HOW THE CONSTITUTION MEANT SENATE WAS SUPPOSED TO WORK, AND I HOPE LEADERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES WILL BE REMINDED OF THAT FROM TIME TO TIME, AND THAT'S MY PURPOSE TODAY. I YIELD THE FLOOR. I SUGGEST THE ABSENCE OF A QUORUM.

QueenieV 发表于 2019-9-25 01:19
这话他是在针对谁呢……

反正不是mike,他是参议院

密切关注紫薯紫薯

上周四
Lee说house大多数票过了386，所以senate也应该考虑

今天会议刚刚开始 grassley请求先说几句话，他说senate不是house的rubber stamp，senate不会自动处理其他body的案子
然后援引了senate book的某条。

卧槽 grassley说得有点狠啊

你的鱼跑了 发表于 2019/09/25 01:44:33
上周四
Lee说house大多数票过了386，所以senate也应该考虑

今天会议刚刚开始 grassley请求先说几句话，他说senate不是house的rubber stamp，senat...

敲山震虎，当然不能直接喷自己的同事，但是绕着弯提点一下，还是有的

你的鱼跑了 发表于 2019/09/25 01:44:33
上周四
Lee说house大多数票过了386，所以senate也应该考虑

今天会议刚刚开始 grassley请求先说几句话，他说senate不是house的rubber stamp，senat...

结合之前周末twitter上展示的他给某位居民的回复邮件，Grassley的态度已经很明确了。我猜测他和一大部分议员一样，刚开始并不清楚H1-b和绿卡之类的政策，被法案的摘要忽悠了。简单了解一下法案背后的事实，背后的真实目的就一目了然了。

我是土豪 发表于 2019-9-25 01:50
敲山震虎，当然不能直接喷自己的同事，但是绕着弯提点一下，还是有的

grassley在参议院地位很高

开场这么说 好多人心很慌

尤其是那个Lee

哈哈哈

虽然不是直接影响这个案子

但是让人心里一阵暗爽