[S386/HR1044]Twitter传UC blocked again?

来自于: U.S. Tech Workers
原消息(不实, 已删推): https://twitter.com/USTechWorkers/status/1184487032527167488
更新: https://twitter.com/USTechWorkers/status/1184491552254681089
Durbin介绍了自己的RELIEF并要求UC, 但是被Senator John Kennedy给Object了. 那样S386明天还是有可能UC...
另外潜伏在IV的Sarah发推: https://twitter.com/GuggenheimSarah/status/1184486420565647361
"See you on February 2021."

个人感觉, 明天Lee可能会UC, 但是Durbin会object, 大家走走过场, 然后S386就歇了...

杜宾的讲话真有水平。

他在演讲里已经把李的S386狠拍了一顿。而且他指出的问题和我们反对的是一致的，比如S386根本不能解决backlog, 其他族裔的排期会大幅增加等，不像大卫普度或者之前那个保罗随便拿护士在那边鬼扯。我觉得明天UC可能性低，就算UC了也很难通过。

个人认为S386明天不大可能UC。Durbin今天把自己的法案拿出来UC不是真的想这法案过，而是做给IV ， Lee看，他自己的法案都不可能UC通过，更不可能让S386 UC。而且这法案是帮助所有移民的，IV以后也再也不可能骂Durbin是racist了，

搬一下这个推下的评论[img]s386 is over. Durbin's objects to it on a fundamental level. listen to his speech https://c-span.org/video/?c48227 ... ducing-s2603-relief[/img]
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4 ... ducing-s2603-relief
这是视频地址

完整的看完了视频，没看过的可以从第十分钟开始看起。Durbin阐述了S386的缺陷，only benefit one country, zero EB-2 from 2023-2030. 看完以后的感觉就是，Relife没戏，但是S386也不可能通过UC。

补充内容 (2019-10-16 16:02):
Zero EB-2 for ROW except certain country

I just watched John Kennedy's objection to the Relief Act. I think it is a relatively positive objection. He basically said he and others need more time to study the bill, which is very reasonable (duh you can not just pass bills by UC). And the important thing is he said he wants to work with Durbin to take up this bill FIRST in the Judiciary Committee (of which they are both members). I assume this FIRST is as apposed to S386, since S386 has yet to hold a hearing in the Judiciary Committee. Based on my knowledge of the Judiciary Committee Chair Lindsey Graham, I feel like that holding hearing for Relief Act is actually a very likely possibility now.

hehemie2 发表于 2019/10/17 00:31:09
个人认为S386明天不大可能UC。Durbin今天把自己的法案拿出来UC不是真的想这法案过，而是做给IV ， Lee看，他自己的法案都不可能UC通过，更不可能让S386 UC。而且这法案是帮助所有移民...

现在骂他是shameless了，还是高估了IV的bar了

还是要警惕Lee明天再UC，而且明天不知道IV又要搞什么幺蛾子，大家一定要保持反对的热度，

已经被Immigration Voice在Twitter上面block了