NIW10.25递交昨天收到RFE，请朋友们帮忙分析一下

律师要下周才能见面，有好心人帮我看看这个吗？这个的意思是我条件通过了，但是然后就是不让过，这样的RFE还有戏吗？谢谢🙏

contributions to the industry or field have been recognized by peers, governmental entities, or professional or business organizations As discussed above, the beneficiary has met at least three of the criteria. Therefore the beneficiary is an alien of exceptional ability in the field. Please note, the evidence must: • Have been in existence as of the date the petition was filed; and • Demonstrate that the beneficiary possesses a degree of expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the sciences, arts, or business. This is the petitioner's opportunity to meet their legal burden of proof to establish eligibility in all respects. Whenever any person makes an application for an immigration benefit, they shall bear the burden of proof to establish eligibility for the benefit sought. Therefore, the petitioner must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, in other words, that it is more likely than not, that the beneficiary is fully qualified for the benefit sought. Accordingly, the decision will submitted upon filing and all additional evidence submitted in response to this request. based on the initial evidence USCIS has designated Matter of Dhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. 884 (AAO 2016) ("Dhanasar") as a precedent decision. That decision rescinded the earlier precedent decision, Matter of New York State Dep't of Transp. ("NYSDOT"), 22 I&N Dec. 215 (Acting Assoc. Comm'r 1998), regarding national interest waivers under Section 203(b)(2)(B)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, and introduced a new three-prong test: interest waiver as a matter of discretion if the petitioner demonstrates by a preponderance of the determining eligibility. Under Dhanasar, USCIS may grant a national evidence that: • The beneficiary's proposed endeavor has both substantial merit and national importance; • The beneficiary is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor; and • On balance, it would be beneficial to the United States to waive the requirements of a job offer and thus of a labor certification. If these three elements are satisfied, USCIS may approve the national interest waiver as a matter of discretion. The initial evidence submitted has established that your proposed endeavor has substantial merit. However, the evidence does not establish that the beneficiary's proposed endeavor has national importance, the beneficiary is well positioned to advance proposed endeavor and on balance, it would be beneficial to the United States to waive the requirement of a job offer and thus of a labor certification. Therefore, USCIS requests additional evidence. The beneficiary's proposed endeavor is of National Importance First, in regards to the proposed endeavor being in the national importance the beneficiary

这是NIW的么？怎么读着像是EB1A的。。。
哪个center哪个IO？哪个律所方便讲么？
感觉是律师的问题？就这一段读起来像是把EB1A的PL没改全改好直接当NIW的PL交了，另外还提到了NIW老三条，难道律师用了NIW老三条的模板？
这个RFE应该还是要参考lz的PL来看

感觉这个pl没好好写，应该是eb1pl直接扔过去了，这几个要求并不一样。实际上这个rfe好论证，证明国家重要性就好。是哪个center和io

读起来真累
都是吃饱了撑的吗他们？说一堆没用的。
就读到最后有个however，累死我了😄
However, the evidence does not establish that the beneficiary's proposed endeavor has national importance。

给律师电话呗，干嘛等到下周见面啊？

这个太简单了，就是把eb1a改写成NIW就行了

这个应该简单。让律师改改就行了。

谢谢朋友们的帮助