## 关于两个行政命令
内容基本一样。说的是45天后,禁止抖音和微信相关的 any transaction。
any transaction that is related to WeChat by any person, or with respect to any property, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, with Tencent Holdings Ltd. (a.k.a. Téngxùn Kònggǔ Yǒuxiàn Gōngsī), Shenzhen, China, or any subsidiary of that entity
(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;
(b) the term “entity” means a government or instrumentality of such government, partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization, including an international organization; and
45 days after the date of this order, the Secretary shall identify the transactions subject to subsection (a) of this section.
一亩三分地用户 @kierkegaard 指出:
一个想法:EO最开始说的是
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA)...
IEEPA赋予的权力只有regulate international commerce,所以范围应该不会超过economic transaction,但是至于广告一类的算不算就不清楚了。
是的,特朗普总统给出了禁令的法律依据是 IEEPA;在两道禁令里,都提到了 transaction会由美国商务部判定 “as identified by the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary)”
众所周知,一亩三分地开发了北美疫情网站,我们的数据也被CDC等权威部门使用,在做网站和维护数据的过程中,我们亲自体会了美国政府部门在“技术”方面是如何落后的。跟我们索取数据的政府部门包括 U.S. Digital Service,根据wikipedia,这个部门是 an elite technology unit housed within the Executive Office of the President of the United States. (我们没给他们数据)。而我们这边,就是一亩三分地几名工程师 + 一群志愿者业余做事而已。
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA)...
IEEPA赋予的权力只有regulate international commerce,所以范围应该不会超过economic transaction,但是至于广告一类的算不算就不清楚了。