符合条件的h1b被裁后可以永久留在美国了

移民局官网链接：https://www.uscis.gov/newsroom/alerts/uscis-provides-guidance-on-employment-authorization-documents-based-on-compelling-circumstances

小红书上有人总结的: approved 140 (not current) + h1b status + 有房贷/孩子在美国上学 + 失去工作，可以申请I-765获得不限工作种类的EAD。有效期一年，到期可以无限续签。配偶也可以拿EAD。

Compelling circumstances could include, if, due to job loss, the family may otherwise be forced to sell their home for a loss, pull their children out of school, and relocate to their home country.

这个是老新闻了，今年2月就出了。叫compelling EAD. 下面链接有详细讲述。现在不过移民局官网说一下。划三个重点，1，EAD只有一年有效期，没有所谓的无限续期。2，1年有效期到了之后必须离境，h1b要重新去cp使领馆面签回美。3，必须满足compelling条件，这个compelling条件最终1解释权归移民局所有，特意说到是case by case

补充内容 (2023-06-16 05:47 +08:00):

3年前的老新闻了，所谓的 compelling EAD
. From 1point 3acres bbs

不信？点下面的链接，看看是不是3年前的，再和移民局昨天14号的官方发布对比一下，看看有什么任何不同之处。


https://www.rnlawgroup.com/790-i...e-ead-what-to-know/

有房贷也不一定行，因为 if, due to job loss, the family may otherwise be forced to sell their home for a loss。你房子的当前价要比买价低才有一点可能，若当前价比买价高，你又没损失，不符合条件。

重点是要么买房，要么有美宝，单身没房的就收拾收拾行李赶紧滚吧

匿名用户 发表于 2023-6-15 14:19
只是举例什么程度算major disruption, 会被迫全家搬到陌生环境孩子会难适应这个程度就可以算 本意不是列举 ...

美宝肯定算吧，否则一个美国国籍小孩儿，理论上是不能假设这个孩子能拿到其他国家签证的。那如果驱逐爸妈出境，难道要把孩子扔孤儿院吗？

第一，这个是临时政策。第二，符合资格申请又不是说一定批准。又搞标题党。

蹲一个解读，这种又算什么身份呢

Compelling circumstances could include, if, due to job loss, the family may otherwise be forced to sell their home for a loss, pull their children out of school, and relocate to their home country.

这里没有用OR 是不是说明三个条件是AND关系  即必须都满足才行

不过官方给出明确的解释总归是好事  等一个法律专家解答

>有房贷/孩子在美国上学
这利好房市。。

哇，要是這樣就太好了！

看了一下详细的条款，发现一个问题，原文附在后面。 我的理解是，这个EAD只能是合法停留美国(Period of authorized stay)，但并不是处于有效的非移民签证状态(non-immigrant status)。如果排期到了，想提交485的时候，可能会因为没有有效签证而被拒。不知道我的理解是否准确，在这里抛砖引玉。

原文链接： https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-10-part-b-chapter-3

部分原文如下：
USCIS considers an applicant with a valid EAD based on compelling circumstances to be in a period of authorized stay by the Secretary of Homeland Security.

As noted above, a period of authorized stay is distinguishable from nonimmigrant status. Individuals who are in a period of authorized stay but are not in a nonimmigrant status may therefore, depending on the facts, be ineligible for a change or adjustment of status for failing to maintain a lawful status.[13] However, individuals in an authorized period of stay do not accrue unlawful presence, so they may subsequently leave the United States to apply for an immigrant or nonimmigrant visa at a consular post abroad, without triggering the unlawful presence grounds of inadmissibility (as long as they have not otherwise accrued periods of unlawful presence).

[^ 13] Applicants are generally barred from adjusting status under INA 245(a) if they are in an unlawful immigration status at the time of filing. See INA 245(c)(2). See Volume 7, Adjustment of Status, Part B, 245(a) Adjustment, Chapter 3, Unlawful Immigration Status at Time of Filing (INA 245(c)(2)) [7 USCIS-PM B.3]. Applicants are also generally barred from adjusting status under INA 245(a) in an employment-based category if they are not in a lawful nonimmigrant status at the time of filing. See INA 245(c)(7). See Volume 7, Adjustment of Status, Part B, 245(a) Adjustment, Chapter 5, Employment-Based Applicant Not in Lawful Nonimmigrant Status (INA 245(c)(7)) [7 USCIS-PM B.5].