OPT延长至24个月政策急需你的支持评论 否则很可能失败！！！

又刷了一条，Comment Tracking Number: 1jz-8map-ej7u
没啥新意，给大家参考一下。
I support the STEM OPT Extension for 24 months.
STEM OPT Extension is an important part of education for overseas students in the United States.If it is cancelled, US will be less attractive to international students, so universities and higher education institutions will be harmed.
Technology firms, especially small ones, really need students with OPT visa.12 months is too short for company training for a students. Usually adapting to a new company would take the student 3-6 months. 12+24 months is appropriate for a student to make some real contributions to the company.
The booming of technology industry in the US is highly attributed to the talented STEM students. Even the CEO of Google comes from India. We should open our hearts to these students that benefit the US.

直接去上面洋洋洒洒，顺便说反对派在cheating, 反复拿相同号码copy paste, SHAME ON YOU!!!
Tracking number: 1jz-8map-yt2n

1jz-8maq-jifs 每日一刷

ICEB-2015-0002-19272
今天继续再水一发去

sskiso 发表于 2015-11-17 03:39
我一条帖子最多只能加150 把你的帖子分4个发，我给你4个100 把这条编辑一下

没事啦 不是完全为了拿分才写的

1jz-8maq-sjsv今天的

Your Comment Tracking Number: 1jz-8maq-komm
one more

晚上再水一条
1jz-8maq-nahm

1jz-8maq-o8nm
再来一条
用了另一个帖子分享的数据 30 billion from international students..
http://www.1point3acres.com/bbs/thread-148234-1-1.html

I think that it is wise to extend the stem extension for F1 students. People’s oppositions to the proposed ruling has a fundamental flaw - most people are just opposed to having almost any international workers, and they really never give deep thoughts into the STEM extension itself.
The biggest advantage of the OPT extension is not about immigration, however, but about the educational market and US’s reputation around the world as the country with the best technology and research. According to a recent study, International students contributed 30 million dollars to US economy, and also had tremendous achievements in research. It is not exaggeration that with International students, the US could not achieve a lot of its innovative work that later transforms to jobs open to local US citizens. If US were to take anyone from the world, it’d better take the smartest people and try to make them stay - either for short term work or for long term immigration. OPT is such an easy way to select the best people from other countries, with most of the F1 students accustomed to the US culture better than a foreign worker coming to the US directly via other visa types. Without this extension, I believe that the US educational market will suffer greatly with reduced number of interested international students, less money, and few qualified researchers who innovate.
I do not see any intelligence in comments that just focus on “protecting US jobs.” Those people with such comments unfortunately fail to recognize how economy functions - not by closing the door but by moving resources around. The key issue here is not about whether we want OPT students, to which the answer is yes, but about how to truly enforce that we have OPT students do the crucial STEM jobs that helps the US economy. It would be bad to allow students do regular jobs that any US citizen can do and does not require a college education - this is not the problem with the intention of having OPT students, but the problem of enforcing that the government is doing what it wants to do. The proposal is doing exactly the thing - it is there to make sure OPT Stem extension is not abused. Anyone with concerns about jobs should welcome the ruling instead of opposing it, because the ruling keeps smart people while protecting regular jobs at the same time.
Reference: http://www.iie.org/en/Who-We-Are/News-and-Events/Press-Center/Press-Releases/2015/2015-11-16-Open-Doors-Data

timohuu 发表于 2015-11-17 05:42
估计是去学习mechanical engineering了，再也不学土木这个坑爹的专业。。。

好好干没问题！大丈夫猛达乃！