OPT延长至24个月政策急需你的支持评论 否则很可能失败！！！

Comment Tracking Number: 1jz-8mao-j84l
最后关头 继续支持

再来一发
Comment Tracking Number: 1jz-8mao-8rov

继续保持关注 1jz-8mao-wyh7

Many people were misled asking to revoke OPT extension rule, or even the OPT policy itself. Normally they claim that international students should go back to where they were once they have graduated. While I'm not judging whether this claim is right or wrong, let me show you why we should do the exact opposite to those claims -- support both OPT and OPT extension. A few years ago, British universities suddenly loosened their gates to Chinese students. It became way easier than before for a student to get into the universities in U.K., especially comparing to universities in U.S.. Countless families thus sent their children to U.K. to get a degree from well-known universities. However, years later, when these students came back to China, they found that the competition they faced was severe. Due to the expansion of Chinese universities, millions of well educated graduates came out of school to fill the need of fast developing economy. Big names alone, do not count that much anymore. A lot of families sadly found that they have paid hundreds of thousand or even more than a million of CNY for their children to study in U.K. universities, could only find a job earning less than 40 thousands a year. The return on investment is depressing. Therefore nowadays, families in China are way more ratio nal than before on deciding the place to get higher education. A lot of factors need to be taken into consideration, and the most important one is job experience. Without OPT and OPT extension, there's no difference between studying in U.S and U.K. -- Well, technically, it is easier to get a degree at U.K. than equivalent universities in U.S.. It is not hard to imagine what's going to happen next: great reduction in number of students coming to U.S. for university education. That will result in great reduction in income of U.S. universities. Since no one will pay multiple times more than local residents, who will pay for the part that is vacant due to the absence of international students? Tax payers. Yes, by repelling international students, it will increase the burden of tax payers to sustain the education system in U.S.. A easy no-win situation. So, please think deeper and you will find that support the OPT and OPT extension will only be beneficial for both international students and American people. Thanks for reading.

track number    1jz-8mao-bsik

大家加油

哎，我应该提交之前保存一下。不然格式全都乱掉了。。。

Comment Tracking Number: 1jz-8mao-r3uj 还有三天

70%的福布斯排名500内的公司都是immigration或者immigration的二代建立的。比如Google， eBay，PG&E， At&t。 这些公司为美国提供了大量工作机会。如果毕业生只能待一年，没人去创业了。。。
我觉得这是一个很好的论点。

tracking:
1jz-8map-qn8z

已支持，关系到我们留学生的重大利益
tracking number:1jz-8map-28sa

come on, the last three days.
1jz-8map-uj7x

Comment Tracking Number: 1jz-8map-yegw