移除国别限制，急需大家联系当地选区house reps, senate reps

首先我也不是专家，有说错的地方请更正。
由于众所周知的原因，印度人，中国人绿卡都有比较长的排期，印度人的非常长，所以他们就原因成立各种组织，然后募捐，去说服各种议员。h4 ead
就是这样通过的，但是95%的h4 ead就是印度人拿到的。虽然现在也要取消了。

现在每年职业移门按国别限制，每个国家出身的分到的名额是一定且一样的，由于印度人工作签证是国人的小10倍，绿卡申请数量也有6，7倍，所以排期自然就长很多。

涉及绿卡数量，名额分配的都是bill，要house先vote 过了，senate再vote 过了，然后总统签字。几年前关于h1工资要求改革的bill好几个，但是连house vote都没到，因为house内部有很多委员会，他们必须先vote，同意才能整个house vote。

hr392 的bill是印度人很早提出来就想通过的
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/392
他们要移除国别限制，这样的话，现在职业移门的名额将绝大多数分给他们，因为他们很老的排期还有很多。然后全世界所有那些没有职业移门排期的国家，都会立刻有很长的排期。
后来印度人发现，hr392这个bill很难直接独立的被vote，于是他们开始各种加塞到各种别的移民相关的bill里，希望别的移民相关的bill通过，顺带通过hr392. 对于两党来说，他们都不关心职业移民的问题，但是关心建墙，dreamer等的移民问题。
幸运的是，以前的他们能加塞的bill都没过。

印度人自己的讨论：

https://twitter.com/hashtag/hr392?lang=en

https://www.trackitt.com/usa-dis ... 0%A6/page/last_page

这次他们又来了, Rep Yode把它又加入了funding bill
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/s3109


本来funding bill就不应该有移民相关的bill，但是funding bill最后肯定会以某种形式在house，和senate通过，否则有些政府部门就的关门。


所以大家要行动起来，联系当地house reps, senate reps，就去他们的网站，直接搜索你所在的选区，比如CA第几选区，然后就会显示reps是谁，他们都有网站的。最后附一份别人写的信：


Dear Rep XXX,

I am writing this letter to urge you to oppose an amendment to the  Fiscal
Year 2019 Homeland Security Funding Bill that “provides additional
flexibility related to the country cap on high-skilled workers under the H1-
B visa program.”

First of first, the description of the amendment shows how illy informed Rep
Yoder is. There is NO law that defines country cap on high-skilled workers
under the H-1B (not H1-B) visa program. In other words, there is no country
cap on high-skilled workers under the H-1B visa program at all. What
flexibility can this amendment bring to something that does not exist?

What the amendment really does is to remove per-country limit on employment-
based green card (permanent residency) allotment. The 7% per-country limit,
set by the Immigration Act of 1990, serves the good purpose of diversity for
about 30 years without any problem until recent years.

About 10 years ago a few IT consulting companies from one country found the
leapholes of temporary work visas including L1, H-1B, B1 and B2. They have
brought millions of workers from their home country to US. And many of the
workers then applied for green cards. As a result, there is a backlog for
those people from that country even though they already take about 30% (7%
cap plus spillovers) of the annual quota.

I understand that pain for those waiting for years for green card. And I
hope there is a good solution for them without hurting US citizens much.
However, the amendment by Rep Yoder is so unthoughtful and unbalanced that
it benefits ONLY citizens from a single country and hurts EVERYONE ELSE
including Americans.

Bear in mind that the backlog was partially caused by temp work visa abuse.
Senator Glassley from Iowa and then Senator Sessions from Alabama have
published multiple reports with regard to this issue. The abuse has resulted
in massive layoffs across all industries  and tens of thousands of US
citizens lost their jobs to those consulting companies that bring cheap
labor from their home country. A good way to fix the backlog problem is to
stop the abuse. However, Rep Yoder’s amendment does nothing to stop the
abuse. Rather, it encourages abuse by trying to offer the abusers an easier
path to US.

Furthermore, should the cap be removed, nearly 100% of the green cards will be
allocated to the citizens of a single country in the first 10 years. This is
against the intention of employment-based green card system which is to
bring smart and hard-working people from around the world, and will greatly
hurt diversity.


. From 1point 3acres bbs

作为一个排期3年半的国家，你让我们给议员写信求不要减少自己排期，就是为了坑另一个排期6年的国家。楼主，你究竟是怎么想的呀？

另一论坛看到别人的讨论： 竟然还有中国eb23支持hr392的?人傻不能怪社会。 他们是非要排在2009pd的烙印后面才舒服?     而且不要以为自己已经拿绿卡或有的中国人pd早可以抢在法案 全部实施前拿卡就不受影响了。这个法案的长远影响比h4ead更糟糕。 哪个老pd的烙印不是拖家带口的。这不单单是很多资历差的 三嫂抢占工作签证名额进入人事部门多招烙印来面试的问题 了。这还有小印靠父辈作弊占了h1绿卡名额然后以后挤掉小中 甚至老中的问题。人目光要放长远。每年h1b被烙印利用 loophole占了大半，根本管不了。现在一旦放开eb23的国别， 情况将比h1b更糟糕。将来绝大部分eb23绿卡都是烙印的， 因为烙印靠作弊已经积累了这么多年的H1+140等待eb23绿 卡. 而且以后烙印以后新的H1+140会更多。

求大家扩散，不是要reps不同意这个bill，还是要他们把移除国别的部分去掉

同关注。
HR392反对的声音不小，貌似见前几次加塞都没成功，然后印度人一直在lobby国会。。。

这件事不好说对中国人是不是件好事，因为国别配额只有7%，但是中国人占PERM申请的9%-11%，移除国别配额对中国人也是好事，虽然会便宜阿三，但我们的目的是使自己过得好，而不是让别人过得不好。还有，这个法案不能减少阿三，因为阿三们都是H1B+140，是可以在美国永久停留的，减少发给他们的绿卡不能减少我们周围的阿三数量。

补充内容 (2018-8-1 01:19):
打错了，我的意思是国别配额不能减少阿三，这个移除国别配额的法案也不能增加阿三，因为他们都是H1B+140

Euler57721 发表于 2018-8-1 01:34
作为一个排期3年半的国家，你让我们给议员写信求不要减少自己排期，就是为了坑另一个排期6年的国家。楼主， ...

if passed, it makes you wait much longer to get your f***ing green card

Euler57721 发表于 2018-8-1 01:34
作为一个排期3年半的国家，你让我们给议员写信求不要减少自己排期，就是为了坑另一个排期6年的国家。楼主， ...

then the 3.5 year backlog will go up to 10 maybe, there are many more old indian pd

我记得是以前那个bill是25%分给中印以外的人 剩下的75%中国人大概可以拿到15% 0.75*0.15 =11%

abc48 发表于 2018-8-1 01:39
if passed, it makes you wait much longer to get your f***ing green card

为啥我觉得是缩短了呢？没有per country quota，每年EB有14万名额但H1b/L1申请人只有10万。

你怎么得出“wait much longer”这个结论，来解释一下？