查看: 665| 回复: 1
跳转到指定楼层
上一主题 下一主题
收起左侧

反对HR1044/S386-比较蓝的反对意见

全局:

注册一亩三分地论坛,查看更多干货!

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号?注册账号

x
本帖最后由 wenting33 于 2019-7-13 03:12 编辑

这算是模板吗?感觉所有模板都群发了的话也许进垃圾桶了吧。如果有用的话请自由摘取片段。

A Liberal Case Against HR.1044/S.386

HR.1044/S.386,“Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act of 2019", if passed in its current form, has profound negative impact on US Higher Education.

HR.1044/S.386 effectively shuts down employment based immigration in the next decade for foreign nationals from 190+ countries while the immigration petition for a few backlogged regions is being cleared up. This, in addition to astringent F-1 visa restrictions, will hurt US colleges, as a whole generation of the brightest students and researchers will not choose to come to the US with no prospects of settling down for good, while other countries like Canada, Germany, France and China are aggressively competing for talent.

US higher education cannot afford to lose them. Few higher education systems in the world can pride themselves like the US in providing a truly global experience, where the best and brightest from all over the world strive to come to. Foreign students and researchers contribute to the diversity on campus and enrich the student experience, which, most importantly, is benefiting American students in many ways.

There is no doubt that underprivileged American students benefited from tuition subsidies provided in part by international students or that many core STEM courses are taught by foreign faculty or graduate student assistants. But the true benefit of international students and scholars does not lie merely in the books. It is the diversity of a global campus that promotes critical thinking and effective communication. American students obtaining these critical skills through exposure to different cultures and global perspectives become adept in handling interpersonal complexities and will thus be more prepared for their future careers in a more interconnected world, regardless of their chosen field of study.

Moreover, it is more important than ever for the US higher education to maintain its unquestionable quality in producing global leadership.  In a multipolar future, where the US is increasingly facing challenges and competition, it is vital that the country's education system brings about a whole generation of global thinkers and doers. On the other hand, students educated in the US are more likely to become unofficial "ambassadors" that promote bilateral relations between the US and their home country.

US higher education must not lose its quality and global competitiveness. If US higher education suffers, so do American students and the future of the country.  

上一篇:HR1044的25%的解读
下一篇:有了解美国立法程序的大神解释一下HR1044/S386的具体流程么?
🔗
 楼主| wenting33 2019-7-13 03:50:11 | 只看该作者
全局:
自己水一下,觉得这么写如果有在校学生?想给蓝州参议员写信(不管是不是已经cosponsor)反对或者希望修改现有的法案(过渡期拉长,cap循序渐进到85%之类的)降低伤害的话。加两段自己个人情况以及夸一下自己的校园diversity多么牛逼,让所有同学都受益就好了。
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册账号
隐私提醒:
  • ☑ 禁止发布广告,拉群,贴个人联系方式:找人请去🔗同学同事飞友,拉群请去🔗拉群结伴,广告请去🔗跳蚤市场,和 🔗租房广告|找室友
  • ☑ 论坛内容在发帖 30 分钟内可以编辑,过后则不能删帖。为防止被骚扰甚至人肉,不要公开留微信等联系方式,如有需求请以论坛私信方式发送。
  • ☑ 干货版块可免费使用 🔗超级匿名:面经(美国面经、中国面经、数科面经、PM面经),抖包袱(美国、中国)和录取汇报、定位选校版
  • ☑ 查阅全站 🔗各种匿名方法

本版积分规则

>
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表