【重发：反新版S.386行动指南】S.386昨天通过了参议院！新增加了【直接】排华条款！

本文在华人参政板块发过一次，因为华人参政板块回复有积分限制，故在移民绿卡板块重发。管理员可删除华人参政板块原帖。
对于新版S.386法案，担心受到影响，准备反对新版S.386的同学，可以按照下面的方法，给议员打电话，给学校发邮件。
自11月以来，Sen Scott和Mike Lee就S386达成了agreement的传言就一直有流传，而Mike Lee 昨天（12月2日）下午东部时间六点钟就这个法案再次进行UC，令人震惊的是，这个法案没有任何参议员当场反对，按照unanimous consent 流程，法案直接通过了参议院！（cspan录像：https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4 ... 2-hr1044s386-passed）
这次S.386与以往不同的是，直接增加了针对华人的歧视条款。一直以来我们看到有标题叫S.386是“排华法案”，很遗憾的是，在今天，它是真正地、直接地成为了切切实实的排华法案。法案全文如下，（section 9是排华条款）：
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1044/text
请大家注意，这会是一个法律，而不是一个行政法规，移民法律本来就很难改革，这条成为法律以后，一切针对中国人、通过遏制中国人拿绿卡打压中国移民、阻断中国移民职场上升、纵容对中国人有敌视的签证方面行政手段，都有了法律上的正当理由！今年一系列类似于微信禁令、中国学生禁令、H1B工资规则、H1B出入境EO等等，我们之所以还能屡屡“松一口气”，还能心怀希望，不就是因为法庭还能判决这些措施是非法的？而今，堂而皇之针对一个国家的人的歧视性条款，不再是临时的EO，不再是一个行政性的条款，而是一条法律，如果这还不是排华法案，什么是排华法案？
大家阅读上面的条款，可以发现，它的措辞是十分模糊的：1. adjustment of status. Status不光是绿卡，理论上，可以是所有的visa status，因此这不光是中国人拿绿卡受限，而且还包括了F/H/O/B类签证的身份转换。2.“As determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security”, DHS在这上面拥有决定权，有很大的解释权。简单的说。你的签证官，不想给你签证，就可以直接套用这个条款。3. Affiliation with military 以及政党，严格的说，初中高中的军训也算在内。Again，就看你的签证官或者绿卡面试官愿不愿意拿这个把你拒了。
作为坚持反386一年的，既受排期之苦，也被各种移民苛政焦头烂额的普通志愿者，在此，我想掏心掏肺地，在反386的最后，也是最紧要的关头，真诚地说一句：我知道有的人觉得拿掉country cap他自己的排期能加快，我知道许多人有政见上的不同，但不管是什么，面对如此直接歧视华人的法律，我们不应该沉默。哪怕你支持S.386，或者你甚至心里并不欢迎中国的新移民来到美国，但是对于这样一条明晃晃的歧视条款写进法律，每个有基本良知的人，都不应该沉默。许多悲惨的故事已经在历史上发生过，我们不应让那些历史成为正在发生的未来。哪怕你支持S.386,也请发声，反对这一歧视条款。更不要说因为s.386将被造成N年内拿不到绿卡的受害者。
黎明前的黑暗是最黑暗的，但我们并不能因此在最后放弃。这个bill House之前投票通过的版本和Senate现在通过的版本差异很大，Senate这个版本加了好几个amendments，所以是会打回House Judiciary Committee 重新reconcile的。对我们来说，坏消息是这届立法周期马上就要结束了（还有两个礼拜），所以Mike Lee和House里这个法案的支持会马上推进法案在House的进程的，留给我们的时间不多了！！！
接下来的几天，是真正的最后一博。希望这篇文每个读者都能：每天做以下这两件事， 并且每天告诉至少身边的3个人这个消息并解释危害，
一个是给House Judiciary Committee和Nancy Pelosi （phone 2022254965）打电话和写信。尤其是Judiciary Committee 下面这个 Immigration and Citizenship Subcommittee的议员。（尤其是考虑到事情的紧急性，工作日打电话优先！可以周末写信）
联系方式可以参考这个google form
https://drive.google.com/file/d/ ... 0I/view?usp=sharing
以下是最新版联系方式：
House Immigration Subcommittee:

Telephone List:
Dem 民主党

Nancy Pelosi 202 225 4965

1 - Sylvia Garcia, (D-TX-29): 202 225 1688
2 - Sheila Jackson Lee (D- Texas – 18): 202 225 3816
3 - Lou Correa (D-CA – 46): 202 225 2965
4 - Joe Neguse, (D-CO-02): 202 225 2161
5 - Veronica Escobar, (D-TX-16): 202 225 4831
6 - Mary Gay Scanlon, (D-PA-05):  202 225 2011


Chinese American House of Representative
1 – Grace Meng 202 225 2601
2 – Judy Chu  202 225 5464
3 – Ted Lieu  202 225 3976

“We strongly oppose H.R.1044/S.386.   H.R.1044 will kill the diversity of our employment- based immigration system. The new version of H.R.1044/S.386 include “Chinese exclusion section” which will ban most if not all Chinese nationals from entering the US. It will hurt our university system in USA. Please block H.R.1044/S.386.
********************************

Republican 共和党 （不要提自己是中国人)

1 - Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO-04): 202 225 4676
2 - Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH-04): 202 225 2676
3 - Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ-05): 202 225 2635
4 - Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-AZ-08): 202 225 4576
5 - Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA-04): 202 225 2511
6 - Rep. Greg Steube (R-FL-17): 202 225 5792 （House投了No重点打）
7 - Rep. Kelly Armstrong(R-ND-01): 202 225 2611

“We strongly oppose any version of H.R.1044/S.386. H.R.1044 is favoring outsourcing companies and will open a floodgate to outsourcing companies if it got passed. Millions of Americans have lost jobs as a result of outsourcing. This Bill will hurt us even more by rewarding the outsourcers. Please block H.R.1044/S.386.”

还有众议院议长佩洛西的联系方式：
Nancy Pelosi （phone 2022254965）

以下三个议员house投票的时候就投了No。我们一定要重点打
CA-46, J. Luis Correa(D), DC: 2022252965, Other office: 7145596190
FL-17, Steube (R) DC:Phone: 2022255792; Lake Placid,Phone: 941 4993214
CA-4, Tom McClintock(R), DC: Phone: 2022252511; Other office：9167865560
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
CO-2, Joe Neguse(D),DC:2022252161
CO-4, Ken Buck(R), DC: 2022254676; Castle Rock, Phone: 7206399165;
Greeley,Phone: 970 7022136
AZ-8, Debbie Lesko (R) DC: 2022254576; Other office: 6237767911
FL-26, Debbie Mucarsel-Powell(D)：Phone:2022252778, Other office: 305)2220160
ND-0， Kelly Armstrong （R)：Phone: 202 2252611; Bismarck Office Phone: 7013546700; Fargo: 7013536665
PA-5, Mary Scanlon (D), Phone: 202 2252011, other office:610 6261913
TX-16, Veronica Escobar(D), Phone: 2022254831, other office:9155411400
WA-7, Pramila Jayapal(D), Phone: 2022253106;Other office: 2066740040
大概的模版如下：
“We strongly oppose Bill H.R.1044/S.386 Fairness for Skilled Immigrant Act, since it will kill the diversity of our employment- based immigration system. The Senate version was added a few amendments which weren’t included in the House version, including a discriminative “Chinese exclusion section” , that legitimize discrimination against Chinese by a legislation form. If it were passed into law, it will almost cut the entire future Chinese immigrants inflow and endanger current Chinese immigrant legal status in US. It is a discriminative provision that will raise hatred and discrimination against American Asians. It will also eliminate the chances of building a healthier immigration system, it will allocate over 90% of the Employment Based green card to people from one country thus block the path way to “American dream” of immigrants from over 190 countries. Please express you opposition to this bill when it is sent back to the Judiciary Committee to reconcile the differences.”
除了表达以上的反对意见外，还请提到关于具体条款的反对:
（1）When claiming to solve backlog issue for people from the two largest countries, this bill however designed a mechanism to exclusively assign visa quotas to one country only. Section 2, (e)(2)(B) unreserved visa allocation cap between the two largest states says there is a 85% unreserved visa cap inside the 70% visa quotas that will follow a First-In-First-Out rule, essentially it is taking away China’s visa quotas to materialize a de-facto Chinese Exclusion Act in the next ten years. Even without the Chinese exclusion provision, this section can eliminate Chinese nationals from getting green cards in the next 10 years. We are strongly against it and we urge to treat people from the big two countries equally, during a reasonable time period from now on instead of a non discrimination on the surface but a real discrimination in the reality.
(2) （共和党尤其适用）The new version of the bill removed 50–50 rule come up by Sen. Durbin to protect American workers and International students from the unfair competition with outsourcing companies. Due to the business models of outsourcing company, they have had unfair advantage in getting H-1B visas, especially compared with international students graduated from US colleges. Durbin’s 50–50 rule helped to reduce the abuse of H-1B visa by outsourcing companies but the new amendment removed it. We urge this amendment to be added, and there should be no waiting period for 50–50 rule to be valid to avoid outsourcing companies’ tricks.
2. 第二个是给你的美国就读的大学打电话和写信。优先级是1）校长； 2）International Student Office负责人； 3） Government Relationship 的负责人；4） Chief of Staff。这些信息一般学校校长办公室页面都有，没有的话google 学校名字加职位就都有了。
因为这个事情非常紧急，而学校办事效率都很慢，所以大家最好先发邮件（标题注明Urgent）然后直接打电话过去follow up。
大概模版如下：
Please help international students to block a ricist immigration bill (HR 1044/S.386)
I am (NAME), who holds a [or studying] (SPECIFIC DEGREE FROM NAMED UNIVERSITY). I do (SPECIFIC RESEARCH/TECH WORK) with colleagues who are from all over the world. I am writing to you about a modern Chinese Exclusion Act, which is also a looming crisis for America’s competitive advantage in technology with grave consequences for both higher education institutions like (NAME THE SCHOOL), and for our economy.
On December 2nd, 2012, the immigration bill S.386/HR.1044 is passed, together with a discriminative provision, explicitly against Chinese, cloaked in national security. It gives power to Department of Home Security, to ban any adjustment of (visa) status as long as DHS thinks those Chinese nationals have , quote, “affiliated with military forces or Chinese Republican Party”. That poses the threat of deportation, entry ban, or even persecution to all Chinese nationals in the US.
There are about one million people in the high-skilled green card waiting line, and it is growing with employment-based applicants exceeding green card numbers every year. Even worse, a proposed piece of legislation, S.386, wants to exacerbate the problem through zero-sum legislation. It attempts to repeal the per-country cap of green cards for skilled new Americans as if that alone will solve the backlog. The Congressional Research Service proved earlier this year that the number of people waiting for green cards will double in a decade, while under S. 386, the waiting time for immigrants from all over the world will become 17 years, practically destroying the employment-based immigration system in the country.
A 17-year wait time will deter the brightest of the foreign students and scholars from coming to the US and much of the research labs in our university will experience a drop in recruitment and applicant quality. This is threatening the very function of the university and will set us back in competition.
We ask to meet with you following up on this letter, to discuss specific ways (NAME THE SCHOOL) can help.
/Full Name/ (note: writing your full name within forward slashes acts as an easy electronic signature: e.g./John T. Smith/)
Full Name
另外请加入我们的群，我们有很多要做的事情急缺人手：https://t.me/joinchat/PxkK_1OzIn4sGdGlwK0Y3A
未来几天如果我们收到消息也会及时给大家分享。不到最后我们都别放弃。

响应楼主号召打电话的，建议电话里表明自己的身份，到底是不是中共党员，说清楚（作为党员的）自己为啥觉得不能禁止党员拿绿卡

既然是党员就要堂堂正正，既然要向议员提建议就要摆明自己的身份和利益。

当然也建议向自己的国内党组织汇报下自己在美国的挫折，看党组织能不能给你关怀
no offense：
成年人要对自己的行为负责，既然选择入党宣誓，享受了对应的好处，就要承担相应的代价。

退一步讲，即使你后悔了，也可以退党啊，官方手续可能办不了，你自己发个声明总是可以的，提前5年还有救

再退一步，即使你不愿意退，那也别把我们这些无辜的非党员绑到你的反"反华"战车里，别再进一步捆绑党和国了。。。


补充内容 (2020-12-4 10:53):
禁止党员拿绿卡不仅不反华，更符合我党的要求啊，详见 中国共产党纪律处分条例 第八十一条:违反有关规定取得外国国籍或者获取国（境）外永久居留资格、长期居留许可的，给予撤销党内职务、留党察看或者开除党籍

没看出哪里反华了，为啥非有人要把党和国混在一起？是自己糊涂还是故意搅混水？

非要故意把中国人和党员混为一谈，我看反华的不是S386，而是楼主吧

大家都去打电话吧，人家看你们这么团结，一定会含着泪把党员改成Chinese national的

@Warald 我们有很多人担心，反对新版S.386，但是不知道如何去发声，去行动。希望W大可以帮忙置顶一下，给想要反对S.386的同学一个行动指南，告诉他们该如何反对S.386。如果能发到微信公众号就更好了

不知道踩楼主的什么心态，具体利弊W大都分析过了。就说一点，排除烙印血赚以外，中国人可以多拿也是好事，但是我们必须坚决反对把chinese national写进移民法的提案。

W大关于section 9的解读跟楼主似乎不太一样。我在这里把相关内容贴一下方便大家比较，大家自己分析吧。

“Warald不认为会有“挖祖宗八代”式的牵连。每个中国人，亲戚族谱里总能找出党员或者当过兵的。如果发生这种“极端情况”，大家操心的主要问题不是能否办绿卡，而是“中美断交”、中国人彻底无法入境美国。

Warald认为：affliation指的是“你本人直接相关”，而不是“你父母、兄弟姐妹或者亲戚”的情况。另外，affliation指的是“current/active”的情况。”

最早是不是现任党员就行，后来是需要证明自己已经退党多年，再往后呢？
不要觉得你不是党员就没事，团员算不算？少先队员呢？直系亲属有没有党员，团员？
虽然我不觉得会变态到这个地步，但是放任下去就是跟温水煮青蛙一样。之后给你个RFE，证明你不是党员，这咋证明？

ramassass 发表于 2020-12-4 05:29
不知道踩楼主的什么心态，具体利弊W大都分析过了。就说一点，排除烙印血赚以外，中国人可以多拿也是好事， ...

不知道您什么心态，什么时候把Chinese national写到移民法里了？ 哪条？党员 affiliation不限于国籍，台湾人、香港人、澳大利亚人如果涉及参与zhong国共产党员，都符合要求。
把这个新加条款等同于排华法案纯属propaganda，和不要脸的tom scott一个水准。最有利的argument是把China Communist Party改成Communist Party。但你想想全世界哪个communist party影响力大且遭人厌恶。 朝鲜共产党员出来之后，如果不是间谍，回去要被枪毙的。 古巴人民极度反感社会主义，从Marco Rubio这个二代移民和Florida古巴裔移民投票就能看出来。中国的就不说了hhh

我同意反对单独把反中国共产党写进移民法律，但是N年拿不到绿卡是哪些人？