求指导这几道填空

1.Over the past hundred years, numerous experiments on elementary particles have _____ the classical paradigm of a causal, deterministic universe  by showing that some natural phenomena are truly random.
A. augmented   B. supported   C. upended   D. investigated   E. undermined   F. probed

2. Unlike other anthologies of Asian American literature, this one is organized solely by alphabetical order of the author's last names rather than along chronological or ethnic lines.
2.While this decision is not explained, it is not in itself (i)______. More troubling is that similarly shrouded in editorial (ii)_______ is the question of why these particular writers were selected and others excluded, for which some (iii)_____ was clearly employed.
A. comprehensible       D. respectability    G. detachment
B. distinctive                 E. silence                H, rationale
C. problematic              F. convention          I. action

第一题目前答案是给DF, 但是其他的答案我也见过，所以不太确定。

第二题我是觉得CEG， 但是答案给CFH， 各位怎么看呢。

第一题是CE吧？

第一个 原文在这里: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/ ... t%20hundred%20years,that%20can%20register%20their%20impact. 用的 "upended"

关键词在 "deterministic" vs "truly random" 是反义词, 所以要选一个 "偏减号词". A B 是加号, 肯定不用. C E 是减, D F 是中性. 既然原文是 C, 那所谓的 "DF 答案" 肯定就是答案有问题. 个人倾向选 CE.

第二个不会, 哈哈哈

为什么文集收录的是这些作家而不是另外的人，这其中一定采取了某种准则（rationale）。这个问题同样潜藏在编排文集时的约定格式（convention）背后，且更加烦人。