补充内容 (2022-12-05 18:30 +8:00):. From 1point 3acres bbs
This code creates two threads that try to acquire locks on two ReentrantLock objects: lock1 and lock2. Each thread acquires the lock on one of the objects and then attempts to acquire the lock on the other object. However, since the two threads are running concurrently, it is possible for one thread to acquire the lock on lock1 before the other thread acquires the lock on lock2, or vice versa. This can lead to a situation known as a "deadlock", where both threads are blocked waiting for the other to release the lock they are holding, resulting in both threads being stuck indefinitely.
To avoid this situation, it is important to ensure that locks are always acquired in the same order by all threads. In this case, one possible solution would be to make all threads first acquire the lock on lock1 and then the lock on lock2. This way, no thread will be blocked waiting for a lock that another thread is holding.. From 1point 3acres bbs
It's also worth noting that the synchronized keyword in Java provides a mechanism for acquiring and releasing locks on objects automatically. In this case, using synchronized with the lock1 and lock2 objects instead of using the ReentrantLock objects directly would simplify the code and avoid the potential for deadlocks. However, using ReentrantLock objects allows for more fine-grained control over the locking behavior, so it can be useful in certain situations.
不能粘贴图片 写下ai对代码的分析吧 一段java经典的死锁代码，直接分析出来了
从程序员这个行业类比的话是不是相当于任何business agnostic logic都可以由AI来完成，大到setup infra，data pipeline，create an app from scratch, 小到任何一个可以明确定义输入输出的function。而未来程序员的作用可能会更加集中于理解client的需求并将其分解成一个个AI能执行生成的task最后将结果拼装起来。
狗仔卡
匿名用户-UIBER
