查看: 1452| 回复: 0
跳转到指定楼层
上一主题 下一主题
收起左侧

[托福] 求建议

全局:

注册一亩三分地论坛,查看更多干货!

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号?注册账号

x
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that the whole society today expect young people to follow are too strict..1point3acres

1 这些规定对我们好
2 比起过去现在的人的规定不算严格
3 相比之下现在的人实则是更加自由 同性恋 女权问题

With a quality life come many obligations. As the quality of life has been developed a great deal, some new principals become more and more embedded in our daily life, which include doing more exercises, keep a balanced diet, live a regular life and so on. Because of those new restrictions, some people points out that people now are treated more strictly than before, which I cannot agree.
.google  и
Although those rules seem very demanded on the surface, they are actually crucial to assuring our health, longevity and thus, quality of life, which we should follow spontaneously as our nature. Mothers always warn their children not to get caught hanging out with wrong crowd and speak in a good manner, which always annoyed us when we were young while helped us form a good habit which lay a good foundation for our future. If we apply the same logic to those new principals to young people now, we find that the seemly rigid rules are actually a big stir to encourage people to live mighty and righteously. The rules to a young person is like a long rail to a rumbling train---even though the force by the rail is a sort of disturbing, it prevents the train from losing its way. . 1point 3 acres

Compared to rules in the past, those today cannot be called restricted at all. Australia as a whole was once a prison for British people who expelled thousands kilometers away from home only because they committed some minor crimes like stealing a penny for a bread to get along; African was once regarded as slaves sold all over the Western world whose freedom was totally deprived and whose lives hang on a thread on every minute of their rest of lives; Putting those into consideration, can our rules compete with those of people who lived in the past in terms of rigidity?. Χ

Our society has gone through many significant  changes during the past century, one of which is that human rights get a great promotion. For one thing, as to homosexuals, they are given a unprecedented free now. The law of validity of marriage between homosexuals is put in place in many states or even countries; Movie stars publicize their homosexual tendency on twitter or facebook such as Jim Parsons who acts as Sheldon in the Big Bang Theory; Gay Pride Parade takes place every year in many international big cities namely Sydney and Toronto. All of those are impossible to happen even thirty years ago. In the same vein, as the word feminism is enjoying its popular support, women participates more in varies of roles in our society including prime minister. At the end of the day, it seems that people today are given more freedom than before.

All in all, people get more rights than before and the so-called new rules that regular young people today is not only beneficial to them but also unworthy of mentioning compared with rules in old days.

上一篇:GT都这么凶残吗?
下一篇:GT可以在网申submit前寄送吗
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册账号
隐私提醒:
  • ☑ 禁止发布广告,拉群,贴个人联系方式:找人请去🔗同学同事飞友,拉群请去🔗拉群结伴,广告请去🔗跳蚤市场,和 🔗租房广告|找室友
  • ☑ 论坛内容在发帖 30 分钟内可以编辑,过后则不能删帖。为防止被骚扰甚至人肉,不要公开留微信等联系方式,如有需求请以论坛私信方式发送。
  • ☑ 干货版块可免费使用 🔗超级匿名:面经(美国面经、中国面经、数科面经、PM面经),抖包袱(美国、中国)和录取汇报、定位选校版
  • ☑ 查阅全站 🔗各种匿名方法

本版积分规则

>
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表