OPT延长至24个月政策急需你的支持评论 否则很可能失败！！！

elementary 发表于 2015-11-11 06:18
I strongly agree with this proposal and the reasons supporting the proposal are clear and reasonable ...

这个是个人臆测。没有任何证据表明，现行政策不好。或者现行政策有使得国际学生不来美国读书的情况或者趋势。每年的国际学生数量在增长是事实。一个公司真正需要的是人才，而不是人。如果一个人才没有很多的工作经验，是不能成为行业精英的。从这点来说，OPT的延长并不能给公司带来行业精英。真正能带来精英的是，去海外招募工作经验有10年的人员，给这些人H1B比给新毕业的OPT延期来的更有效。不是吗？

Jianshan_JL 发表于 2015-11-11 06:06
Comment Tracking Number: 1jz-8m6m-h1tc

The OPT extension policy states that "DHS continues to bel ...

其实，博士后在博士后流动站工作本来就是因为找不到合适的工作才去博士后流动站工作的。此外，博士后的CASE应该另外对待。而不应该归到OPT EXTENSION里面。因为博士后的数量和本科生的数量是不能比的。SMALL EDGE CASES 应该SPECIALIZED而不应该GENERALIZED.

贡献一份力，评论了将近六百字，大家继续给力啊！Comment Tracking Number: 1jz-8m6n-7cs6

henrywu 发表于 2015-11-11 07:22
我靠 我觉得不对啊 我发了那么多次了 怎么一直不显示啊。。 就算写的比较水 但也不至于不发啊 我看还有美国 ...

确实如此，美国人一句话今天10号发的，都显示出来了，我们的为什么这么多天没发出来。我用的都是外国人的名字，内容也没语法错误，怎么就显示不出来？DHS故意留着positive的不发，让水军丧失警惕后最后一天都发出来。。肯定没这么好我脑洞太大了。

怎么办，急需解决这个问题！

1jz-8m6n-pc2q

清除cookies了，但是前天发的也没出来，不知道只是received但是没post的评论有没有用

glormyzh 发表于 2015-11-11 07:28
确实如此，美国人一句话今天10号发的，都显示出来了，我们的为什么这么多天没发出来。我用的都是外国人的 ...

对于这种审核制度 很奇怪啊。。。。。（弱弱的问句 其实这个失败了 那到底17个月还有没有  我觉得dhs很奇怪啊很奇怪啊。。。。 难道 他只是po一下 然后就此取消? 这他妈就是个过场? 这过场的结果。。。）

1jz-8m6n-c04t
..
好歹我写了100字呢，我从来都没写过这么长的评论，为什么不能显示啊，老美小编赶紧把我评论吐出来！！！

1jz-8m6n-brca
负面评论好多。。。。。。大家加油啊 积极为自己争取应得的权利

1jz-8m6n-qktx
I totally support this rule!
These benefits will encourage future international students to join STEM programs in the U.S. and allow U.S. companies to remain competitive globally. International students will enhance U.S. companies by providing novel perspectives, fresh ideas, new processes, and specialized skill sets to augment the abilities of staff employees. Also, STEM students will allow employers the opportunity to accomplish bigger projects, achieve more innovation, and develop new products and technology(Many big projects will last more than one year, so one year's OPT is far from enough for international students to finish it), all of which will further fuel the U.S. economy.
Many opponents of expanding the period of OPT seek to pit native-born workers against their foreign-born colleagues. But, in fact, workers do not compete against each other for a fixed number of jobs. The United States has created a dynamic and powerful economy, and immigrants of all types and skills, from every corner of the globe, have worked with native-born workers to build it. Skilled immigrants’ contributions to the U.S. economy help create new jobs and new opportunities for economic expansion. Indeed, foreign-born students who graduate with an advanced degree in STEM fields from U.S. universities positively impact the U.S. economy and employment opportunities of native-born workers.
The most dramatic gains in U.S. employment come from immigrants who earned advanced degrees at US universities and are employed in STEM fields. Changing temporary immigration policies, such as by expanding the OPT period to 24 months, to favor holders of advanced degrees from U.S. universities in STEM fields is an obvious step given the demand for highly skilled workers and the extensive investment the country already makes in such students. Without a clear path to stay in the United States, these foreign students will fuel innovation and economic growth in countries that compete with the American economy.
With this letter, I urge you to support the U.S. economy by implementing this new rule by February 12, 2016. Thank you for your consideration, time, and support in this matter.

找了几个New York Times 和Reuters的评论文章，可以从中找到点新思路。

Should Foreign Graduates Get a Visa Edge?
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/01/education/edlife/should-foreign-graduates-get-a-visa-edge.html?_r=0

“According to a Brookings Institution analysis, in 2010 only 30 percent of foreign graduates of U.S. universities received an H-1B visa, awarded to temporary workers in specialty occupations. And though 64 percent of all international students in science, technology, engineering and math, or STEM, come from India and China, they are still subject to the 7 percent cap per country that immigration law places on green cards. The wait is so long for permanent residency, many simply leave.”

“”In a letter supporting the Senate bill, 14 associations representing thousands of higher education institutions described an urgent need: “According to projections, the United States will face a shortfall of more than 200,000 advanced-degree STEM workers by 2018,” the associations wrote. “In many STEM areas, foreign students are a majority of the Ph.D. graduates from U.S. universities.” It went on to say that the “immigration system forces many of them to leave, sacrificing the innovation and economic growth they would create here.”

“Or, as one prominent immigration lawyer, Stephen Yale-Loehr, put it: “Imagine if the next Google or Facebook were to be developed in India or China. All those jobs that could have been in the United States instead are being developed overseas and competing against our best companies.”

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/07/idUSnMKWzJN1wa+1d8+MKW20150407#jBqiM1Fq8xYvgEL4.97

http://blog.legalsolutions.thomsonreuters.com/law-and-techology/court-ruling-threatens-status-of-50000-tech-visa-holders/
“The challenge to the OPT visas was brought, in part, based on concern by some parties that the OPT system places technology professionals born outside of the United States at a competitive advantage over U.S. born professionals.  Instead, the OPT program should be viewed as a method to protect the significant investment made by commercial enterprises and the United States government in STEM education programs.

The OPT system helps to ensure that students educated through American STEM programs ultimately apply their skills and education in the United States.  Forced repatriation of OPT visa holders is unfair to the individuals involved, and it wastes the substantial U.S. resources invested in the education of those students.  The Department of Homeland Security should act immediately to satisfy the requirements of the court to ensure that extended OPT visas remain valid”