OPT延长至24个月政策急需你的支持评论 否则很可能失败！！！

ogjkfkungosxsf 发表于 2015-11-11 06:45
会有一个tracking number, 过个一两天就可以用它查一下自己的评论

这个我倒是记录了，也保留原稿了，如果查了没有也可以重发，但是不知道怎么查。是从那个search栏那里搜索tracking number吗？

reality 发表于 2015-11-11 06:51
在右上角的search bar直接输入tracking no

你知道大概要多久吗，我搜地里最前面发的tracking number都搜不到评论

reality 发表于 2015-11-11 06:51
在右上角的search bar直接输入tracking no

我查了昨天发的，显示下面内容，这是时间不到还没发出来还是有什么问题没发成功啊？

Comment Tracking Number Match
This comment was received in Regulations.gov but is not yet posted. Please contact the agency directly for more information.

I strongly support the new DHS proposed rule of OPT STEM Extension.

I read through lots of the comments no matter they are with or against the proposal, now I want to state some facts to all of you that don't really understand what this proposal is about.

1. Most of the disagree opinions are accusing OPT STEM students of stealing the jobs from US Citizens which is not making much sense because the truth is - only the E-verify approved company could employ OPT STEM students and they are "required to ensure that the terms and conditions of a STEM practical training opportunity are commensurate with those for similarly situated U.S. workers in other employers of analogous size and industry and in the same geographic area of employment." --- i.e. the employers are forced to fairly consider US citizen candidates first before hiring any OPT STEM student.

2. Most of the disagree opinions are accusing the companies of hiring OPT STEM students for paying lower salaries putting the US Citizens out of their jobs - which is again not making much sense - because OPT STEM Program is designated to be training positions such as internships, research assistants, trainee programs which come with a lower wages themselves. Again, US Citizens are treated equal upon all these opportunities.

With all the facts above I don't see there is any reason we should stand against OPT STEM students.

Instead, I think we should stand with them - International students created or supported 340,000 jobs and contributed $26.8 billion to the U.S. economy during the 2013-2014 academic year, according to NAFSA’s latest economic analysis (attached).

So people, please see the real fact and support this beneficial proposal instead of letting your emotion blind your eyes!!!

1jz-8m5g-j2st

hylldxm 发表于 2015-11-11 06:54
我查了昨天发的，显示下面内容，这是时间不到还没发出来还是有什么问题没发成功啊？

Comment Tracking ...

我周日发的也没出来！我也不知道怎么回事。。说是要审核一两天。。。

reality 发表于 2015-11-11 07:07
我周日发的也没出来！我也不知道怎么回事。。说是要审核一两天。。。

我也是周末发的，到现在都没有出来....

xcj87390521 发表于 2015-11-11 06:58
I strongly support the new DHS proposed rule of OPT STEM Extension.

I read through lots of the co ...

首先，更低的工资并不是只的是你拿到手里的钱，他们指的是公司的支出。对于雇佣一个OPT的学生，公司无需向政府缴纳 社会保障金和医疗养老金。而本地的人，个人和公司都必须缴纳。而且这笔钱最后是用于养老机制的，也就是说你如果不缴纳的话，其他的人可能会多缴纳，因为有财政赤字。

ogjkfkungosxsf 发表于 2015-11-11 06:43
又愉快的去水了一发，tracking number: 1jz-8m6m-e70p

下面是内容，求不嘲笑语法问题

你的观点有点问题。首先，美国不给延长OPT，不代表他们不给OPT。在没有延长OPT的前提下，并没有证据显示国际学生不会选择美国留学。给了OPT延期也没有证据表明会有更多的学生来。其次，给了OPT延期，对你这届学生有了好处。但是下一届新学生来的时候，由于你没有走，那么可以把位子腾出来给他的机会就小了。这样是否会造成更多的留学生不愿意来美国，也未尝可知。请把问题再阐述的清楚一些。结合你自身说明问题，但是不要只顾着自己来说明问题。

reality 发表于 2015-11-11 07:07
我周日发的也没出来！我也不知道怎么回事。。说是要审核一两天。。。

那估计很多人都是这种情况，呼吁大家一定要保存好草稿啊，万一没发成功可以再发，避免做无用功，咱们本来就势单力薄了，浪费不起啊

我靠 我觉得不对啊 我发了那么多次了 怎么一直不显示啊。。 就算写的比较水 但也不至于不发啊 我看还有美国人就一句话 肯定有什么地方不对劲啊 我不信美国人就那样就能发 我们那么多人关心这个 居然5个评论 只哟一个是支持的。。。。我要去发信问一下