楼主: sskiso
跳转到指定楼层
上一主题 下一主题
收起左侧

[OPT] OPT延长至24个月政策急需你的支持评论 否则很可能失败!!!

     关闭
🔗
sue10086 2015-11-11 07:43:00 | 只看该作者
全局:
1jz-8m6n-brca. 1point3acres
负面评论好多。。。。。。大家加油啊 积极为自己争取应得的权利

评分

参与人数 1大米 +100 收起 理由
austurela + 100 记得用匿名模式发评论

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
liuqing91118 2015-11-11 07:47:35 | 只看该作者
全局:
1jz-8m6n-qktx
I totally support this rule!
These benefits will encourage future international students to join STEM programs in the U.S. and allow U.S. companies to remain competitive globally. International students will enhance U.S. companies by providing novel perspectives, fresh ideas, new processes, and specialized skill sets to augment the abilities of staff employees. Also, STEM students will allow employers the opportunity to accomplish bigger projects, achieve more innovation, and develop new products and technology(Many big projects will last more than one year, so one year's OPT is far from enough for international students to finish it), all of which will further fuel the U.S. economy.
Many opponents of expanding the period of OPT seek to pit native-born workers against their foreign-born colleagues. But, in fact, workers do not compete against each other for a fixed number of jobs. The United States has created a dynamic and powerful economy, and immigrants of all types and skills, from every corner of the globe, have worked with native-born workers to build it. Skilled immigrants’ contributions to the U.S. economy help create new jobs and new opportunities for economic expansion. Indeed, foreign-born students who graduate with an advanced degree in STEM fields from U.S. universities positively impact the U.S. economy and employment opportunities of native-born workers.
The most dramatic gains in U.S. employment come from immigrants who earned advanced degrees at US universities and are employed in STEM fields. Changing temporary immigration policies, such as by expanding the OPT period to 24 months, to favor holders of advanced degrees from U.S. universities in STEM fields is an obvious step given the demand for highly skilled workers and the extensive investment the country already makes in such students. Without a clear path to stay in the United States, these foreign students will fuel innovation and economic growth in countries that compete with the American economy.
With this letter, I urge you to support the U.S. economy by implementing this new rule by February 12, 2016. Thank you for your consideration, time, and support in this matter.

评分

参与人数 1大米 +100 收起 理由
austurela + 100 记得用匿名模式评论

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
Jianshan_JL 2015-11-11 07:56:07 | 只看该作者
全局:
本帖最后由 Jianshan_JL 于 2015-11-11 07:57 编辑

找了几个New York Times 和Reuters的评论文章,可以从中找到点新思路。

Should Foreign Graduates Get a Visa Edge?
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/01/education/edlife/should-foreign-graduates-get-a-visa-edge.html?_r=0

. Χ
“According to a Brookings Institution analysis, in 2010 only 30 percent of foreign graduates of U.S. universities received an H-1B visa, awarded to temporary workers in specialty occupations. And though 64 percent of all international students in science, technology, engineering and math, or STEM, come from India and China, they are still subject to the 7 percent cap per country that immigration law places on green cards. The wait is so long for permanent residency, many simply leave.”
.
“”In a letter supporting the Senate bill, 14 associations representing thousands of higher education institutions described an urgent need: “According to projections, the United States will face a shortfall of more than 200,000 advanced-degree STEM workers by 2018,” the associations wrote. “In many STEM areas, foreign students are a majority of the Ph.D. graduates from U.S. universities.” It went on to say that the “immigration system forces many of them to leave, sacrificing the innovation and economic growth they would create here.”

“Or, as one prominent immigration lawyer, Stephen Yale-Loehr, put it: “Imagine if the next Google or Facebook were to be developed in India or China. All those jobs that could have been in the United States instead are being developed overseas and competing against our best companies.”

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/07/idUSnMKWzJN1wa+1d8+MKW20150407#jBqiM1Fq8xYvgEL4.97. 1point 3acres

http://blog.legalsolutions.thomsonreuters.com/law-and-techology/court-ruling-threatens-status-of-50000-tech-visa-holders/
“The challenge to the OPT visas was brought, in part, based on concern by some parties that the OPT system places technology professionals born outside of the United States at a competitive advantage over U.S. born professionals.  Instead, the OPT program should be viewed as a method to protect the significant investment made by commercial enterprises and the United States government in STEM education programs.

The OPT system helps to ensure that students educated through American STEM programs ultimately apply their skills and education in the United States.  Forced repatriation of OPT visa holders is unfair to the individuals involved, and it wastes the substantial U.S. resources invested in the education of those students.  The Department of Homeland Security should act immediately to satisfy the requirements of the court to ensure that extended OPT visas remain valid”
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
不锈钢太阳 2015-11-11 07:59:13 | 只看该作者
全局:
1jz-8m6n-8jwg
不知道为啥,好多逗比老美把印度外包公司跟OPT延期搞混了
晚上回去再写一条评论

评分

参与人数 1大米 +100 收起 理由
austurela + 100 记得用匿名模式评论

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
逐月华 2015-11-11 08:09:38 | 只看该作者
全局:
1jz-8m6o-kxw1

评分

参与人数 1大米 +100 收起 理由
austurela + 100 记得用匿名模式评论

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
wx0823 2015-11-11 08:09:42 | 只看该作者
全局:
Tracking Number: 1jz-8lv4-vyse

评分

参与人数 1大米 +100 收起 理由
austurela + 100 记得用匿名模式评论

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
逐月华 2015-11-11 08:13:58 | 只看该作者
全局:
1jz-8m6o-905p

评分

参与人数 1大米 +100 收起 理由
austurela + 100 记得用匿名模式评论

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
312330367 2015-11-11 08:14:14 | 只看该作者
全局:
1jz-8m6o-4b42

评分

参与人数 1大米 +100 收起 理由
austurela + 100 记得用匿名模式评论

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
k06045 2015-11-11 08:19:47 | 只看该作者
全局:
第三发, Comment Tracking Number: 1jz-8m6o-1yy9

I am strongly support this regulation get approved.
.--
It is very easy to reject any positive proposals, but it will take many years to recover from the bad impact. As bystanders, we are even more clear about what happened and is happening in USA, we know why USA is getting so strong and why USA gathers so many top talents, it is so easy to destroy it.

Please seriously consider that, only USA keeps strong, the people of USA can have better life.  

评分

参与人数 1大米 +100 收起 理由
austurela + 100 记得用匿名模式评论

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
怪兽岛 2015-11-11 08:20:21 | 只看该作者
全局:
我已经写了三份了,后两份还是以注册用户身份写的,为什么到现在一份都没发出来?难道他们是抽签随机决定谁的帖子能发出来??太奇怪了
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册账号
隐私提醒:
  • ☑ 禁止发布广告,拉群,贴个人联系方式:找人请去🔗同学同事飞友,拉群请去🔗拉群结伴,广告请去🔗跳蚤市场,和 🔗租房广告|找室友
  • ☑ 论坛内容在发帖 30 分钟内可以编辑,过后则不能删帖。为防止被骚扰甚至人肉,不要公开留微信等联系方式,如有需求请以论坛私信方式发送。
  • ☑ 干货版块可免费使用 🔗超级匿名:面经(美国面经、中国面经、数科面经、PM面经),抖包袱(美国、中国)和录取汇报、定位选校版
  • ☑ 查阅全站 🔗各种匿名方法

本版积分规则

>
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表