[S386/HR1044]IV对于S386的deal的态度

https://www.facebook.com/243363639063201/posts/2824688047597401

非常非常negative, IV表示这是Durbin的Poison Pill, 如之前所料, 甩锅给了别人(很有可能是R). 个人估计是无限EAD那条, 共和党肯定不能同意, 这简直和川普的"Hire Americans"完全背道而驰.

接连想到了Leon这两天的tweet

another Senate unwritten rule for the passive observers out there.  If you block a bill to carry water for a group, and then that group doesnt support your compromise, that means the group was never acting in good faith.  And member should call that out, lest member be lumped in!

合着这是背着IV搞了个Deal, 所以前两天含沙射影指的Immigration group不是ROW, 是IV

再结合Sarah之前的tweet:

So, while there is no deal yet, do not worry about it. It can/will be really good for all of us

"really good for all of us"意思就是S386加了Poison Pill所以直接gg了?

cqluzhutou 发表于 2019/12/17 14:23:46
我建议认真解读 了在去反对吧！！

认真解读需要时间，这也不是正式的文本，我们反的是UC，连文本都没有看糊里糊涂就通过了到时候全傻眼，这几条里脊没有包括阁老的H1B 滥用附加条款，又没有软泡的护士，肯定不是最终的版本，我们必须要防止他们糊里糊涂的UC了，而且即使是这几条对华人的说法也是不明不白的

传说中的的deal细节：
1- Allocation of GCs will continue according to country caps till Oct 1st, 2020 (i.e, FY2020)
2- Transition rule is the same: 15%, 10%, 10% for RoW for the first three years. (2021-2023)
3- no-harm provision applies to people who got i140 approved prior to the ENACTMENT DATE (the date the president signs it)
4- people whose i140 gets approved after the enactment date are not protected but they can file for i485 as normal if their PD is current till Oct 1st, 2020. If they can't get GC before the effective date they will go through the transition period
5- people who are approved after i140 after Oct 1st, 2020 can have EARLY FILING for i485
they will get a combo EAD/AP card. they will be able to work and travel until their PD becomes current. The validity of EAD is 3 years.
6- if i140 is not approved after 270 days the applicant will also be able to have early filing.
7- The EAD will be given to the primary applicant. For the dependents, they get it only if their current non-immigrant visa allows getting EAD or allowing working.
8- for 9 years you will have 5.7% for GCs reserved for ROWs for dependents and people outside the US.
9- at least 4,400 GCs are for jobs with labor shortage (limited to EB3)

我建议认真解读 了在去反对吧！！

他们这叫嚣的方式也是够骚的

hackenkreuz 发表于 2019-12-17 10:53
他们这叫嚣的方式也是够骚的

今天操作都很骚, 那个反S386的骚的不行, IV这也骚到不行...

建议下回截图贴出来

Natural2012 发表于 2019-12-17 10:57
建议下回截图贴出来

好的, tweet截图比较好弄, 但是那个FB的post实在是太长了

不能相信烙印，没准是得了便宜还卖乖

Sarah刚推了一句：it seems I was right again !😉

https://twitter.com/guggenheimsarah/status/1206771265308151808

kpongyu 发表于 2019-12-17 10:59
不能相信烙印，没准是得了便宜还卖乖

也有可能, 但是我们现在至少看到IV似乎不再是S386的主导, 或者说S386已经慢慢蜕变成一个完全不同的bill了...

kpongyu 发表于 2019-12-17 11:02
Sarah刚推了一句：it seems I was right again !😉

https://twitter.com/guggenheimsarah/status/1 ...

https://twitter.com/USTechWorkers/status/1206770886130331648

US Tech Worker也发推了, 给Durbin小心心

kpongyu 发表于 2019-12-17 10:59
不能相信烙印，没准是得了便宜还卖乖

应该不至于，肯定至少是个140 EAD啥的。首先共和党绝对不会同意，这等于放开了百万人在美国跳槽找工作，其次IV背后的推手，BiG Tech肯定也不同意，他们只想大多数人卡在绿卡申请过程中无法自由跳槽。