📣 独立日限时特惠: VIP通行证立减$68
查看: 1689| 回复: 3
跳转到指定楼层
上一主题 下一主题
收起左侧

[托福] TPO4,《20年后的轿车使用会减少》求改

全局:

注册一亩三分地论坛,查看更多干货!

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号?注册账号

x
Do you agree a disagree: In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than today. 1point3acres.com
字数270

From the current statistics, the number of cars is in dramatic increase of 20 percent each years. And it's estimated that there would be more cars twenty years later. But I hold a different idea on this issue. I agree with the idea that there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.. 1point3acres.com

First of all, more people would rather choose public transportation than driving cars. After twenty-year construction, the public transportation system will be more convenient and sophisticated. People can go anywhere taking buses, subways or high-speed trains. There is no need to drive their own cars. Taking public transportation is the general trend nowdays, and twenty years later, this would come into fact.

Secondly, it would be more costing to own a car. We will see the end of petroleum in the next few decades. And this would definetely lead to the roaring price of gasoline which upsets people's desire of buying a car. Moreover, government may lay heavy tax on car owners in order to control air pollution. In 2013, the Chinese government are already discussing charging car owners extra money to protect the environment.

Thirdly, cars may be replaced by other vehicles. Even nowadays, some rich people are buying their own private jet. I believe that twenty years later, the decreasing price of private jet and increasing income would encourage people to buy more advanced vehicles such as private jet.

In summary, the convenience of public transportation, the desire of owning a more advanced vehicles as well as economic considerations leads to the conclusion that in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.

评分

参与人数 2大米 +8 收起 理由
perlin + 5
tacit + 3 zan

查看全部评分


上一篇:豆腐机经10.12【10月1日更新版】
下一篇:156+167+3总结
🔗
tacit 2013-10-2 22:19:48 | 只看该作者
全局:
膜拜lz短小精悍的作文。。唯一一点,字数超过300为好吧?
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
 楼主| billpeng 2013-10-3 12:29:58 | 只看该作者
全局:
tacit 发表于 2013-10-2 22:19 . ----
膜拜lz短小精悍的作文。。唯一一点,字数超过300为好吧?
..
恩恩,才开始练习,时间没掌握好,下次一定注意字数。谢谢提醒
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
perlin 2013-10-6 10:03:38 | 只看该作者
全局:
Do you agree a disagree: In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than today
字数270

From the current statistics, the number of cars is in dramatic increase of 20 percent each years. And it's estimated that there would (时态)be more cars twenty years later. But I hold a different idea on this issue. I agree with the idea that there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.

First of all, more people would rather choose public transportation than driving cars. After twenty-year construction, the public transportation system will be more convenient and sophisticated. People can go anywhere taking buses, subways or high-speed trains.(高铁不是这么说的) There is no need to drive their own cars. Taking public transportation is the general trend nowdays, and twenty years later, this would come into fact.
. 1point3acres
Secondly, it would be more costing to own a car. We will see the end of petroleum in the next few decades. And this would definetely lead to the roaring price of gasoline which upsets people's desire of buying a car. Moreover, government may lay heavy tax on car owners in order to control air pollution. In 2013, the Chinese government are already discussing charging car owners extra money to protect the environment.. check 1point3acres for more.

Thirdly, cars may be replaced by other vehicles. Even nowadays, some rich people are buying their own private jet. I believe that twenty years later, the decreasing price of private jet and increasing income would encourage people to buy more advanced vehicles such as private jet.

In summary, the convenience of public transportation, the desire of owning a more advanced vehicles as well as economic considerations leads to the conclusion that in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today..
首先,文章的字数实在太短,300不到的文章不可能拿高分,建议先做到30min里面打350+字
其次,文章的分论点设置得非常好,很有新意
第三,文章的语言写得不错,用词很讲究
最后,和第一点是相通的,每一段都没有充分展开详述,很像一篇加长版的优秀CET6作文。建议仔细研读OG raw score 4分 5分范文再多加练习
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册账号
隐私提醒:
  • ☑ 禁止发布广告,拉群,贴个人联系方式:找人请去🔗同学同事飞友,拉群请去🔗拉群结伴,广告请去🔗跳蚤市场,和 🔗租房广告|找室友
  • ☑ 论坛内容在发帖 30 分钟内可以编辑,过后则不能删帖。为防止被骚扰甚至人肉,不要公开留微信等联系方式,如有需求请以论坛私信方式发送。
  • ☑ 干货版块可免费使用 🔗超级匿名:面经(美国面经、中国面经、数科面经、PM面经),抖包袱(美国、中国)和录取汇报、定位选校版
  • ☑ 查阅全站 🔗各种匿名方法

本版积分规则

>
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表