我觉得这个帖子的标题比较误导人,重点没有真正突出,希望管理员能够修改一下。
虽说规定内容和之前相差不大,但本次发布的意见稿的核心在于“延迟这项规定的生效时间,以便政府能够有更多时间周全考虑各方利益和意见”(见规定概述:This additional delay will provide a sufficient amount of time to thoroughly consider the legal and policy issues raised in the rule, and offer the public, through the issuance of a separate Request for Information, an opportunity to provide information on the sources and methods for determining prevailing wage levels covering employment opportunities that United States (U.S.) employers seek to fill with foreign workers on a permanent or temporary basis through certain employment-based immigrant visas or through H-1B, H-1B1, or E-3 nonimmigrant visas. This proposed delay will also provide agency officials with a sufficient amount of time to compute and validate prevailing wage data covering specific occupations and geographic areas, complete and thoroughly test system modifications, train staff, and conduct public outreach to ensure an effective and orderly implementation of any revisions to the prevailing wage levels.)
. 1point3acres
个人认为,拜登政府在原有的延迟上再度大幅延迟生效日期,应该意味着拜登政府计划对这项规定进行大规模的修改,或者把它搅黄再推出自己的改革措施。在这种情况下,规定本身的内容已经不再那么重要,关键在于我们是否要支持它的延期,亦或者反对延期让它7月份就匆匆生效。